Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Filed by the Registrantý

Filed by a Party other than the Registranto

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o


Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))

ý


Definitive Proxy Statement

o


Definitive Additional Materials

o


Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12
§240.14a-12

SALLY BEAUTY HOLDINGS, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

SALLY BEAUTY HOLDINGS, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o


Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1)and 0-11.
 (1) 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 (2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 (3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 (4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 (5) 

Total fee paid:


o


Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o


Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange ActRule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.



(1)

 

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 (2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 (3) 

Filing Party:

 (4) 

Date Filed:


Table of Contents


LOGO

LOGO


LOGO

3001 Colorado Boulevard, Denton, Texas 76210

Letter from our President and Chief Executive Officer

To our stockholders,

You are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting of stockholders of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., which will take place at the Sally Support Center,Beauty Headquarters, 3001 Colorado Boulevard, Denton, Texas 76210 on Thursday, January 26, 2017,30, 2020, at 9:00 a.m., local time. Details of the business to be conducted at the annual meeting are given in the Official Notice of the Meeting, Proxy Statement, and form of proxy enclosed with this letter.

Even if you intend to join us in person, we encourage you to vote in advance so that we will know that we have a quorum of stockholders for the meeting. When you vote in advance, please indicate your intention to personally attend the annual meeting. Please see the Question and Answer section on Page 4page 67 of the enclosed Proxy Statement for instructions on how to obtain an admission ticket if you plan to personally attend the annual meeting.

Whether or not you are able to personally attend the annual meeting, it is important that your shares be represented and voted. Your prompt vote over the Internet, by telephone via toll-free number or by written proxy will save us the expense and extra work of additional proxy solicitation. Voting by any of these methods at your earliest convenience will ensure your representation at the annual meeting if you choose not to attend in person. If you decide to attend the annual meeting, you will be able to vote in person, even if you have personally submitted your proxy. Please review the instructions on the proxy card or the information forwarded by your bank, broker, or other holder of record concerning each of these voting options.

On behalf of the Board of Directors, I would like to express our appreciation for your continued interest in the affairs of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.

LOGO

GRAPHIC

LOGO

Christian A. Brickman

Director, President and Chief Executive Officer


December 9, 2016



December 18, 2019


Table of ContentsSALLY BEAUTY

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.
HOLDINGS, INC.

3001 Colorado Boulevard, Denton, Texas 76210



Official Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders



To our stockholders:

The annual meeting of stockholders of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (the "Corporation"“Corporation”) will take place at the Sally Support Center,Beauty Headquarters, 3001 Colorado Boulevard, Denton, Texas 76210 on Thursday, January 26, 2017,30, 2020, at 9:00 a.m., local time, for the purpose of considering and acting upon the following:

    (1)
    The election of the nine directors named in the accompanying Proxy Statement for a one-year term;

    (2)
    To approve an advisory (non-binding) resolution regarding the compensation of the Corporation's named executive officers, including the Corporation's compensation practices and principles and their implementation, as disclosed in the accompanying Proxy Statement;

    (3)
    To express the views of the stockholders on how frequently advisory votes on executive compensation, such as Proposal 2, will occur;

    (4)
    The ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our 2017 fiscal year; and

    (5)
    To transact such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting or any adjournment thereof.

 

(1)

The election of the twelve directors named in the accompanying Proxy Statement for aone-year term;

(2)

To approve an advisory(non-binding) resolution regarding the compensation of the Corporation’s named executive officers, including the Corporation’s compensation practices and principles and their implementation, as disclosed in the accompanying Proxy Statement;

(3)

The ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our 2020 fiscal year; and

(4)

To transact such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting or any adjournment thereof.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on December 1, 20162, 2019 will be entitled to vote at the meeting.


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be held on January 26, 2017:
30, 2020:

The Proxy Statement and the 20162019 Annual Report to stockholders are available at:

www.edocumentview.com/sbh

By Order of the Board of Directors,



GRAPHIC

LOGO




Matthew O. Haltom

John Henrich

Corporate Secretary

December 9, 2016




IMPORTANT:



If you plan to attend the annual meeting you must have an admission ticket or other proof of share ownership as of the record date. Please see the Question and Answer section on Page 4 of this Proxy Statement for instructions on how to attend the annual meeting. Please note that the doors to the annual meeting will open at 8:00 a.m. and will close promptly at 9:00 a.m.

Whether or not you expect to personally attend the meeting, we urge you to vote your shares at your earliest convenience to ensure the presence of a quorum at the meeting. Promptly voting your shares via the Internet, by telephone via toll-free number, or by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card will save us the expense and extra work of additional solicitation. The Internet voting and telephone voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available until 1:00 a.m., local time, on January 26, 2017. If your shares are held in street name by a bank, broker or other similar holder of record, your bank, broker or other similar holder of record is not permitted to vote on your behalf on Proposal 1 (election of directors), Proposal 2 (approval of an advisory resolution regarding the compensation of the Corporation's named executive officers, including the Corporation's compensation practices and principles and their implementation, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement), Proposal 3 (expression of the views of the stockholders on how frequently advisory votes on executive compensation, such as Proposal 2, will occur), unless you provide specific instructions by completing and returning a voting instruction form or following the voting instructions provided to you by your bank, broker or other similar holder of record. Enclosed is an addressed, postage-paid envelope for those voting by mail in the United States. Because your proxy is revocable at your option, submitting your proxy now will not prevent you from voting your shares at the meeting if you desire to do so. Please refer to the voting instructions included on your proxy card or the voting instructions forwarded by your bank, broker, or other similar holder of record if you hold your shares in street name.

Table of Contents18, 2019

 


2016IMPORTANT:

If you plan to attend the annual meeting you must have an admission ticket or other proof of share ownership as of the record date. Please see the Question and Answer section on Page 67 of this Proxy Statement for instructions on how to attend the annual meeting. Please note that the doors to the annual meeting will open at 8:00 a.m. and will close promptly at 9:00 a.m.

Whether you expect to personally attend the meeting, we urge you to vote your shares at your earliest convenience to ensure the presence of a quorum at the meeting. Promptly voting your shares via the Internet, by telephone via toll-free number or by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card will save us the expense and extra work of additional solicitation. The Internet voting and telephone voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available until 1:00 a.m., local time, on January 30, 2020. If your shares are held in street name by a bank, broker or other similar holder of record, your bank, broker or other similar holder of record is not permitted to vote on your behalf on Proposal 1 (election of directors) or Proposal 2 (approval of an advisory resolution regarding the compensation of the Corporation’s named executive officers, including the Corporation’s compensation practices and principles and their implementation) unless you provide specific instructions by completing and returning a voting instruction form or following the voting instructions provided to you by your bank, broker or other similar holder of record. Enclosed is an addressed, postage-paid envelope for those voting by mail in the United States. Because your proxy is revocable at your option, submitting your proxy now will not prevent you from voting your shares at the meeting if you desire to do so. Please refer to the voting instructions included on your proxy card or the voting instructions forwarded by your bank, broker, or other similar holder of record if you hold your shares in street name.


LOGO

TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 2019 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
10 PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 15 BOARD NOMINEE QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE 16 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES 16 Board Purpose and Structure 16 Corporate Governance Philosophy 17 Board Diversity 18 Corporate Responsibility and ESG 20 Director Independence 20 Nomination of Directors 20 Stockholder Recommendations or Nominations for Director Candidates 21 Director Qualifications 21 Annual Election of Directors 21 Mandatory Retirement Age of Directors 21 Directors Who Change Their Present Job Responsibilities 22 Board Self Evaluations 22 Board Meetings and Attendance 22 Board Leadership Structure 22 Communications with the Board 23 Board’s Role in the Risk Management Process 23 Committees of the Board of Directors 25 Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation 25 Compensation Risk Assessment 26 Related Party Transactions 2 SALLYBEAUTY HOLDINGS, INC. 2019 Proxy Statement


LOGO

TABLE OF CONTENTS 27 Directors’ Compensation and Benefits 28 Narrative Discussion of Director Compensation Table 29 Director Indemnification Agreements 29 No Material Proceedings 30 BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF THE COMPANY’S STOCK 31 Securities Owned by Directors and Executive Officers 32 Persons Owning More than Five-percent 33 PROPOSAL 2 - ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 34 EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 36 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 36 Compensation Discussion and Analysis 54 Compensation Committee Report 55 Compensation Tables 62 CEO PAY RATIO 63 PROPOSAL 3 - RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF AUDITORS 64 Report of the Audit Committee 66 DEADLINES AND PROCEDURES FOR NOMINATIONS AND STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS 67 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING 70 OTHER MATTERS A-1 APPENDIX 1 NON-GAAP FINANCIAL NUMBERS RECONCILIATION www.sallybeautyholdings.com 3


LOGO

2019 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY Proxies are being solicited by the Board of Directors of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: SBH) (“we,” “us,” or the “Corporation”) to be voted at our 2020 Annual Meeting. This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Time and Date

9:00 a.m., January 26, 2017

Place

Sally Support Center, 3001 Colorado Boulevard, Denton, Texas 76210

Record Date

December 1, 2016

Voting

Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the proposals to be voted on.

Entry

Time and Date 9:00 a.m., January 30, 2020 Place Sally Beauty Headquarters, 3001 Colorado Boulevard, Denton, Texas 76210 Record Date December 2, 2019 Voting Stockholders as of the Record Date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the other proposals to be voted on. Entry If you decide to attend the meeting in person, upon your arrival you will need to register as a visitor with the security desk on the first floor of the Sally Beauty Headquarters and you must have an admission ticket or other proof of share ownership as of the Record Date along with a government-issued identification card in order to attend the meeting. On or about December 18, 2019, we will mail a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to our stockholders of record as of the Record Date. The Notice contains instructions on how to access over the internet the Company’s Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement, form of proxy and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019 (FY19). Voting Matters Proposal Board Vote Recommendation Page Reference (for more detail) Proposal 1: Elect twelve directors FOR each Nominee 10 Proposal 2: Approve, on the first floor of the Sally Support Center and you must have an admission ticket or other proof of share ownership as of the record date along with a government-issued identification card in order to attend the meeting.

Meeting Agenda

Voting Matters2020 FOR 63 4 SALLYBEAUTY HOLDINGS, INC. 2019 Proxy Statement

Proposal
Board Vote
Recommendation

Page Reference (for
more detail)

Election of nine directorsFOR7
Approval of an advisory (non-binding) resolution regarding the compensation of the Corporation's named executive officers, including the Corporation's compensation practices and principles and their implementation, as disclosed in this Proxy StatementFOR66
Expression of the views of the stockholders on how frequently advisory votes on executive compensation, such as Proposal 2, will occur1 YEAR67
Ratification of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2017FOR68

i


Table of Contents


Proposal 1 — Election of Directors (see page 7)LOGO

2019 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY Director Nominees Twelve directors are standing for election at the 2020 Annual Meeting for one-year terms. The following table provides summary information about each director nominee. The nominees receiving a plurality of the director nominees as well as their committee memberships. The table also discloses the Board’s determination as to the independence of each nominee under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and relevant rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Additional information about each nominee’s background and experience can be found beginning on page 10. To be elected, each nominee must receive more votes cast at the meeting will be elected as directors.

Name
Age
Director
since

Occupation
Experience/
Qualification

Independent
AC
CC
EC
NG
Christian A. Brickman51September 2012President & Chief Executive Officer, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.Management, InternationalX
Katherine Button Bell58March 2013Vice President & Chief Marketing Officer, Emerson Electric CompanyManagement, MarketingXX
Erin Nealy Cox46August 2016Retired Executive Managing Director of Stroz Friedberg, LLCManagement, Cyber Security, LegalXX
Marshall E. Eisenberg71November 2006Founding Partner, Neal Gerber & Eisenberg LLPGovernance, Risk Management, LegalXXXXC
David W. Gibbs53March 2016President & CFO, Yum! Brands, Inc.Management, FinanceXX
Robert R. McMaster68November 2006Retired Executive and Independent AuditorManagement, Finance, AuditXCXX
John A. Miller63November 2006President & CEO, North American CorporationManagement, FinanceXXC
Susan R. Mulder45November 2014Chief Executive Officer, Nic & Zoe Co.ManagementXXX
Edward W. Rabin70November 2006Retired ExecutiveManagementXCX

“for” such nominee’s election than votes cast “against” such nominee’s election. Name Age Director since Occupation Experience/ Qualification Independent AC CC EC MC NG/ CR Christian A. Brickman 55 September 2012 President & Chief Executive Officer, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. Management, International • Timothy R. Baer 59 Founder & Managing Partner, TRB Partners LLC; Former EVP, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary, Target Corporation Legal, Governance, Management ✓ Marshall E. Eisenberg 74 November 2006 Founding Partner, Neal Gerber & Eisenberg LLP Governance, Risk Management, Legal ✓ • • C Diana S. Ferguson 56 January 2019 Principal, Scarlett Investments LLC Management, Finance ✓ • Dorlisa K. Flur 54 Senior Advisor and Former Chief Strategy and Transformation Officer, Southeastern Grocers, Inc. Management, Mass Market Retail Transformation ✓ Linda Heasley 64 May 2017 Former Chief Executive Officer, J.Jill, Inc. Management, Retail ✓ • • • Robert R. McMaster 71 November 2006 Retired Executive and Independent Auditor Management, Finance, Audit ✓ C • John A. Miller 66 November 2006 President & Chief Executive Officer, North American Corporation Management, Finance ✓ • C P. Kelly Mooney 55 August 2018 Former Chief Experience Officer of IBM iX Management, Digital Marketing ✓ C • Susan R. Mulder 49 November 2014 Chief Executive Officer, Nic & Zoe Co. Management, Retail ✓ • • Denise Paulonis 47 May 2018 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Michaels Companies Management, Finance ✓ • Edward W. Rabin 73 November 2006 Retired Executive Management ✓ C Committees: AC = Audit Committee
CC = Compensation Committee
EC = Executive Committee
NGMC = Marketing NG/CR = Nominating, Governance and Corporate Governance Committee
Responsibility C = Chair of Committee

If elected, the director nominees will serve until the 20182021 annual meeting. The Board recommends a voteFOR each director nominee. www.sallybeautyholdings.com 5

ii


LOGO


Table2019 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY Board Nominees Snapshot Gender Diversity Board Independence 50% 6 of Contents12 Director Nominees are Women 92% 11 of 12 Director Nominees are Independent Age Mix SBH Board Tenure 2 5 2 3 40s 50s 60s 70s 58 years Median Age 6 2 4 0-4 yrs 5-10 yrs 11+ yrs 5.8 years Average Tenure 6 SALLYBEAUTY HOLDINGS, INC. 2019 Proxy Statement


Proposal 2 — ApprovalLOGO

2019 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY FY19 Performance SAME STORE SALES GROWTH 2.9% -0.7% -1.5% 0.3% FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE $1.56 $2.08 $1.50 $2.26 ADJUSTED OPERATING INCOME (1)(2) ($ in Millions) $515 $501 $468 $458 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 3-YEAR AVERAGE ROIC (2) 22.2% 21.3% 21.4% 21.5% FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY14-16 FY15-17 FY16-18 FY17-19 (1) Please see Appendix 1 for a reconciliation of Non-Binding Resolution Regarding Executive Officer Compensation(non-GAAP numbers. (2) Please see page 66)45 for Adjusted Operating Income definition and page 47 for 3-Year Average ROIC definition. Net Sales were $3.88 billion. Cash Flow from Operations of $320.4 million—used to fund investment in the business, reduce our debt levels by $185 million and fund the repurchase of $46.6 million of our shares. E-Commerce Sales Increased by 29.4% compared to the prior year. Gross Profit was $1.91 billion. www.sallybeautyholdings.com 7


LOGO

We are asking stockholders2019 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY FY19 Strategic Objectives and Accomplishments Refocusing our efforts around our differentiated core of hair color and hair care Continued to approvebuild our innovation pipeline with new exciting brands. SBS: Added new brands such as vivid color lines (Good Dye Young and Arctic Fox). BSG: Added the prestigious color and care brand, Pravana, and Swedish vegan brand, Maria Nila. Launched Box Color across Sally Beauty network. Invested in marketing focused on an advisory (non-binding) basisbuilding awareness and education of these brands. Improving retail fundamentals with targeted investments in people, processes, technology and our stores Launched new Sally Beauty Rewards Loyalty Program, with over 15.9 million active members at the compensationend of FY19. Installed newstate-of-the-art POS system in over 1,400 Sally Beauty and CosmoProf stores as of the Corporation's named executive officers, includingend of FY19. Launched phase one of JDA, our new merchandising and supply chain platform. Optimized our supply chain footprint and transportation network to enhance speed and efficiency. Tested new store concepts for both Sally Beauty and BSG. Advancing our digital commerce capabilities Launched redesigned mobile-first Sally Beauty website. Launched new Sally Beauty app which allows consumers to access their Sally Beauty Rewards points and shop directly from the Corporation's compensationapp. Enhanced CosmoProf app to remove friction from the buying experience for our pro customers. Continuing to drive costs out of the business and operate efficiently In FY19 we found efficiencies and savings in how we operate the business through negotiations with service providers, more streamlined operations and better sourcing. 8 SALLYBEAUTY HOLDINGS, INC. 2019 Proxy Statement


LOGO

2019 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY FY19 Corporate Governance Highlights Board adopted a revised charter of newly-renamed “Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility” (NGCR) Committee. NGCR Committee given authority to oversee corporate responsibility and ESG-related matters. Board initiated sustainability materiality assessment of the Company. Company’s ESG-related efforts are focused on three main areas where we can have a material, meaningful impact: 1) Energy / Environment—we made progress towards reducing our environmental impact by reducing energy usage and increasing energy efficiency. We initiated our SBH Going Green Program, which we hope will eliminate plastic bags in our North American stores, and reduce waste and increase recycling capabilities at our Sally Beauty Headquarters. 2) Product Development and Sourcing—we continue to make progress toward our long-term sustainability goals by using best practices in product development and principlessourcing. 3) Diversity and Inclusion – we continue efforts to show that diversity and inclusion are at the heart of our company: at the Board level, throughout our global workforce and in our shared commitment to serving a diverse customer base and their implementation, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. The Board believescommunities. FY19 Stockholder Outreach During FY19 we engaged with investors and sell-side analysts by hosting numerous meetings and investor calls, and attending equity conferences and non-deal roadshows. We believe that its current compensation program uses a balanced mix of base salary,listening to investors is essential to good governance and annual andto the long-term incentives to attract and retain highly qualified executives and maintains a strong relationship between executive compensation and performance, thereby aligning the interests of the Corporation's executive officers with those of its stockholders. As evidenced by the resultssustainability of our "say-on-pay" vote atcompany. Our senior management is open and accessible. As such, we want to engage with and listen to our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, with over 97% of the shares voted being votedinvestors and sell-side analysts in favor of the proposal,order to have productive conversations in which we believe that stockholders have indicated strong support for the structurereview our strategic objectives, operations and execution of our named executive officer compensation program. The Board recommends a voteFOR this proposal.

progress, and listen to their feedback. FY19 Executive Compensation Highlights Highlights of our named executive officerNamed Executive Officer compensation program, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section on page 40, include:

This advisory (non-binding) resolution regarding the compensation of the Corporation's named executive officers, including the Corporation's compensation practices and principles and their implementation, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting. The Board recommends a voteFOR this proposal.requirements www.sallybeautyholdings.com 9

iii


Table of Contents

Proposal 3 — Frequency of Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation (see page 67)

We are asking stockholders to approve on an advisory (non-binding) basis, how frequently the advisory votes on executive compensation, such as Proposal 2, will occur.

This advisory proposal requires a plurality of the votes cast for one of the three options presented at the meeting. The frequency option which receives the most affirmative votes of all the votes cast at the meeting is the one that will be deemed approved by the stockholders. Stockholders may select from the following options: 1 year, 2 years or 3 years. The Board recommends a vote for1 YEAR.

iv


Table of Contents

Proposal 4 — Ratification of Independent Auditors (see page 68)

Although stockholder ratification is not required by law, we are asking stockholders to ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2017. Set forth below is summary information with respect to KPMG LLP's fees for services provided in fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016. The Board recommends a voteFOR this proposal.

 
 2016
 2015
 
Audit Fees $2,351,143 $2,606,569 
Audit Related Fees     
Tax Fees $786,596 $849,463 
All Other Fees     
Total $3,137,739 $3,456,032 

2018 Annual Meeting

v


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT

1

SOLICITATION AND RATIFICATION OF PROXIES

1

OUTSTANDING STOCK AND VOTING PROCEDURES

2

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING

4

PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

7

INFORMATION REGARDING CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, THE BOARD, AND ITS COMMITTEES

10

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

18

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

19

INFORMATION ON THE COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

20

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

23

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

44

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

45

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

45

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR FISCAL 2016

47

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2016 FISCAL YEAR-END

48

FISCAL 2016 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

50

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

52

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

58

OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES

60

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

63

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

64

PROPOSAL 2 — ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

66

PROPOSAL 3 — ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

67

PROPOSAL 4 — RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF AUDITORS

68

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

69

REDUCE PRINTING AND MAILING COSTS

69

OTHER MATTERS

70

vi


Table of Contents

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.
3001 Colorado Boulevard, Denton, Texas 76210



PROXY STATEMENT

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

January 26, 2017LOGO

 This Proxy Statement is being furnished by Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. ("we," "us," or the "Corporation") in connection with a solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors to be voted at our annual meeting of stockholders to be held on January 26, 2017. Whether or not you personally attend, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the annual meeting. Most stockholders have a choice of voting over the Internet, by using a toll-free telephone number, or by completing a proxy card and mailing it in the postage-paid envelope provided. Check your proxy card or the information provided to you by your bank, broker, or other stockholder of record to determine which voting options are available to you. The Internet voting and telephone voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available until 1:00 a.m., local time, on January 26, 2017. This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card were first mailed on or about December 9, 2016.


SOLICITATION AND RATIFICATION OF PROXIES

        If the enclosed form of proxy card is signed and returned, it will be voted as specified in the proxy, or, if no vote is specified, it will be voted "FOR" all nominees presented in Proposal 1, "FOR" the proposal set forth in Proposal 2, for the "1 YEAR" option set forth in Proposal 3 and "FOR" the proposal set forth in Proposal 4. If any matters that are not specifically set forth on the proxy card and in this Proxy Statement properly come to a vote at the meeting, the proxy holders will vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgments. At any time before the annual meeting, you may revoke your proxy by timely delivery of written notice to our Corporate Secretary, by timely delivery of a properly executed, later-dated proxy (including an Internet or telephone vote), or by voting via ballot at the annual meeting. Voting in advance of the annual meeting will not limit your right to vote at the annual meeting if you decide to attend in person. If you are a beneficial owner, but your shares are registered in the name of a bank, broker, or other stockholder of record, the voting instructions form mailed to you with this Proxy Statement may not be used to vote in person at the annual meeting. Instead, to be able to vote in person at the annual meeting you must obtain, from the stockholder of record, a proxy in your name and present it at the meeting. See "Questions and Answers about the Meeting and Voting" in this Proxy Statement for an explanation of the term "stockholder of record."

        The proxy accompanying this Proxy Statement is being solicited by our Board of Directors. We will bear the entire cost of this solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing, and mailing of this Proxy Statement, the proxy, and any additional information furnished to our stockholders. In addition to using the mail, proxies may be solicited by directors, executive officers, and other employees of the Corporation, in person or by telephone. No additional compensation will be paid to our directors, executive officers, or other employees for these services. We will also request banks, brokers, and other stockholders of record to forward proxy materials, at our expense, to the beneficial owners of our Common Stock. We have retained Alliance Advisors, LLC to assist us with the solicitation of proxies for an estimated fee of approximately $7,500, plus normal expenses not expected to exceed $13,500.


Table of Contents


OUTSTANDING STOCK AND VOTING PROCEDURES

Outstanding Stock

        The stockholders of record of our Common Stock at the close of business on December 1, 2016 will be entitled to vote in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. At that time, there were 143,563,902 shares of our Common Stock outstanding. Each stockholder will be entitled to one vote in person or by proxy for each share of Common Stock held.

        If you hold shares through an account with a bank, broker or other similar holder of record, the voting of the shares by the bank, broker or other similar holder of record when you do not provide voting instructions is governed by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"). These rules allow banks, brokers and other similar holders of record to vote shares in their discretion on "routine" matters for which their customers do not provide voting instructions. On matters considered "non-routine," banks, brokers and other similar holders of record may not vote shares (referred to as "broker non-votes") without your instruction.

        Proposal 4 (the ratification of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our 2017 fiscal year) is considered a routine matter. Accordingly, banks and brokers may vote shares on this proposal without your instructions.

        However, Proposal 1 (election of directors), Proposal 2 (approval of an advisory resolution regarding the compensation of the Corporation's named executive officers, including the Corporation's compensation practices and principles and their implementation, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement), and Proposal 3 (expression of the views of the stockholders on how frequently advisory votes on executive compensation, such as Proposal 2, will occur) are considered non-routine, and banks, brokers and other similar holders of record therefore cannot vote shares on these proposals without your instructions. Please note that if your shares are held through a bank, broker or other similar holder of record and you want your vote to be counted on this proposal, you must instruct your bank or broker how to vote your shares.

Quorum

        A quorum for the transaction of business will be present if the holders of a majority of our Common Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to be cast thereat are present, in person or by proxy, at the annual meeting. Your shares are counted as present if you attend the annual meeting and vote in person or if you properly return a proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum. If a quorum is not present at the annual meeting, the annual meeting may be adjourned from time to time until a quorum is present.

Voting Procedures

        Votes cast by proxy or in person at the meeting will be tabulated by the Inspector of Election from Computershare Trust Company, N.A. In addition, the following voting procedures will be in effect for each proposal described in this Proxy Statement:

        Proposal 1. Nominees for available director positions must be elected by a plurality of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. Withheld votes and broker non-votes will have no effect in determining whether the proposal has been approved.

        Proposal 2. The advisory (non-binding) resolution to approve the compensation of the Corporation's named executive officers, including the Corporation's compensation practices and principles and their implementation, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, requires the affirmative vote


Table of Contents

of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect in determining whether the proposal has been approved.

        Proposal 3. The advisory proposal regarding how frequently advisory votes on executive compensation, such as Proposal 2, will occur, requires a plurality of the votes cast for the three options presented at the annual meeting. The frequency option which receives the most affirmative votes of all the votes cast in person or by proxy at the annual meeting is the one that will be deemed approved by the stockholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect in determining whether any frequency option in the proposal has been approved.

        Proposal 4. Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. Abstentions will have no effect in determining whether this proposal has been approved. Since this proposal is considered a routine matter, there will be no broker non-votes with respect to this proposal.

        If any other matters properly come before the meeting that are not specifically set forth on the proxy card and in this Proxy Statement, such matters shall be decided by a majority of the votes cast at the annual meeting, unless otherwise provided in our Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation ("Certificate of Incorporation"), Sixth Amended and Restated By-Laws ("By-Laws"), the Delaware General Corporation Law or the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange. None of the members of our Board have informed us in writing that they intend to oppose any action intended to be taken by us.

NO PERSON IS AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT, AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATIONS MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED. THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT SHALL, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN OUR AFFAIRS SINCE THE DATE OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT.


Table of Contents


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING

1.     What is a proxy?

2.     What is a proxy statement?

3.     What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a stockholder who holds stock in street name, also called a "beneficial owner?"

4.     How do you obtain an admission ticket to personally attend the annual meeting?

5.     What different methods can you use to vote?


Table of Contents

6.     What is the record date and what does it mean?

7.     What are your voting choices for director nominees, and what vote is needed to elect directors?

8.     What is a plurality of the votes?

9.     What are your voting choices on the proposal inviting stockholders to approve the advisory (non-binding) resolution endorsing the compensation of the Corporation's executive officers, including the Corporation's compensation practices and principles and their implementation, as discussed in this Proxy Statement?


Table of Contents

10.   What are your voting choices on the proposal inviting stockholders to express a preference as to the frequency of an advisory vote on executive compensation?

11.   What are your voting choices on the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2017 fiscal year, and what vote is needed to ratify their appointment?

12.   What if a stockholder does not specify a choice for a matter when returning a proxy?

13.   How are abstentions and broker non-votes counted?

14.   How will stockholders know the outcome of the proposals considered at the annual meeting?


Table of Contents


PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our current Board of Directors consists of nineeleven individuals, eightten of whom qualify as independent of us under the rules of the NYSE. The Board of Directors, acting pursuant to our By-laws, is proposing two new nominees (Timothy R. Baer & Dorlisa K. Flur), with David W. Gibbs not standing for re-election. Our Certificate of Incorporation and our By-Laws provide for the annual election of each of our directors for one-year terms.

        On August 1, 2016, in light of the retirement of Mr. Gary G. Winterhalter, and the appointments of Mr. Gibbs in March 2016 and Ms. Nealy Cox in August 2016, the Board of Directors, acting pursuant to the By-Laws, changed the size of the Board of Directors to nine members.

Following the recommendations of our Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee, our Board of Directors has nominated Mr. Brickman, Ms. Button Bell, Ms. Nealy Cox,Mr. Baer, Mr. Eisenberg, Mr. Gibbs,Ms. Ferguson, Ms. Flur, Ms. Heasley, Mr. McMaster, Mr. Miller, Ms. Mooney, Ms. Mulder, Ms. Paulonis and Mr. Rabin for reelectionelection to our Board of Directors. Accordingly, this Proposal 1 seeks the reelectionelection of these ninetwelve individuals to be directors, toeach with a one-year term that will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders in 2018.

2021. Unless otherwise indicated, all proxies that authorize the proxy holders to vote for the election of directors will be voted "FOR"“FOR” the election of the nominees listed below. If a nominee becomes unavailable for election as a result of unforeseen circumstances, it is the intention of the proxy holders to vote for the election of such substitute nominee, if any, as the Board of Directors may propose. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, each of the nominees has consented to serve and the Board is not aware of any circumstances that would cause a nominee to be unable to serve as a director.

        Each of Except for Mr. Brickman,Baer and Ms. Button Bell, Ms. Nealy Cox, Mr. Eisenberg, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. McMaster, Mr. Miller, Ms. Mulder and Mr. RabinFlur who are standing for election to our Board for the first time, each director nominee is a current directorsdirector with a term expiring at this annual meeting and eachmeeting. Each director nominee has furnished to us the following information with respect to their principal occupation or employment and principal directorships:

Christian A. Brickman Director, President and Chief Executive Officer, age 51.55 Mr. Brickman has served on our Board of Directors since September 2012 and is the Corporation'sCorporation’s President and Chief Executive Officer, a role he has held since February 2015. Prior to being appointed to his current role, Mr. Brickman served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation from June 2014 to February 2015. Prior to joining the Corporation, Mr. Brickman served as President of Kimberly-Clark International from May 2012 to February 2014, where he led the Corporation's international consumer business in all operations. From August 2010 to May 2012, Mr. Brickman served as President of Kimberly-Clark Professional. From 2008 to 2010, Mr. Brickman served as Chief Strategy Officer of Kimberly-Clark and played a key role in the development and implementation of Kimberly-Clark's strategic plans and processes to enhance enterprise growth initiatives. Prior to joining Kimberly-Clark, Mr. Brickman was a Principal in McKinsey & Company's Dallas, Texas office and a leader in the firm's consumer packaged goods and operations practices. Before joining McKinsey, Mr. Brickman was President and CEO of Whitlock Packaging, the largest non-carbonated beverage co-packing company in the United States, from 1998 to 2001. From 1994 to 1998, he was with Guinness/United Distillers, initially as Vice President of Strategic Planning for the Americas region and then as General Manager for Guinness Brewing Worldwide's Latin America region. Mr. Brickman was awarded an advanced bachelor's degree in economics in 1986 from Occidental College in Los Angeles where he graduated with honors, Phi Beta Kappa and cum laude.2014. We believe that Mr. Brickman'sBrickman’s executive and management experience, including his experience as President of two large international companies, well qualifyqualifies him to serve on our Board. 10 SALLYBEAUTY HOLDINGS, INC. 2019 Proxy Statement


LOGO

        Katherine Button Bell,PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS Timothy R. Baer Director Nominee, age 58.    Ms. Button Bell59 Mr. Baer founded and has been Managing Partner of TRB Partners LLC since 2017 and of TRB Law PPLC since 2019. In addition, Mr. Baer has served on our BoardasCo-Chair of Directorsthe PJT Camberview Advisory Council since March 20132017. From 2016 to 2017 Mr. Baer was Senior Advisor to Target Corporation and isfrom 2004 to 2016 he was Target’s Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Chief Marketing Officer of Emerson Electric Company, a diversified global manufacturing and technology company. Ms. Button Bell joined Emerson in 1999 and provides strategic leadership for the company's global marketing, corporate branding, and digital customer experience initiatives. She also oversees corporate communications, market research, and professional development for the company's marketing teams worldwide. In this capacity, Ms. Button


Table of Contents

Bell played a key role in the launch of Emerson's corporate branding program, building Emerson's brand globally. Prior to joining Emerson, Ms. Button Bell was the President of Button Brand Development, Inc., an independent marketing consulting firm specializing in developing well-recognized companies' brand names. Ms. Button BellCorporate Secretary. Mr. Baer has been a director of Johnson Outdoors Inc., a NASDAQ listed manufacturer of outdoor recreation equipment, since September 2014, and was a director of Furniture Brands International, Inc. from 1997 to May 2008. She alsopreviously served as a director of the Business Marketing Association from 2013 to 2014. She currently serves on the marketing/strategy committee of St. Louis Children's Hospital,board member for Greater MSP and is a member of the board of trustees of the St. Louis Art Museum.Greater Twin Cities United Way. We believe that Ms. Button Bell's executiveMr. Baer’s legal and management experience well qualify herqualifies him to serve on our Board.

        Erin Nealy Cox, Director, age 46.    Ms. Nealy Cox has served on our Board of Directors since August 2016. Ms. Nealy Cox served as an Executive Managing Director at Stroz Friedberg, LLC from 2010 until May 2016, where she led the Incident Response Unit. In this role, Ms. Nealy Cox led a global team of first responders, threat intelligence analysts and malware specialists, assisting corporate clients affected by cyber-attacks, state-sponsored espionage and data breach cases to solve complex and high profile cyber-breaches. Prior to her appointment as the head of the Incident Response Unit, from 2010 to 2012, Ms. Nealy Cox led Stroz Friedberg's Central Division, where she was responsible for oversight of the digital forensic laboratories, examiners and staff throughout the entire region. Stroz Friedberg has provided various cyber-security services to the Company. Prior to her career at Stroz Friedberg, Ms. Nealy Cox worked for the Department of Justice as an Assistant United States Attorney for the Northern District of Texas, and from 2004 to 2005, she served as Chief of Staff to the Assistant Attorney General in the Office of Legal Policy in Washington, D.C. Ms. Nealy Cox serves on the Financial Committee of the Perot Museum of Nature and Science and was formerly a director of the Dallas Children's Advocacy Center and the Volunteer Center of Texas. Ms. Nealy Cox graduated with a BBA in Finance from University of Texas at Austin and a JD from SMU School of Law. We believe that Ms. Nealy Cox's extensive cyber-security, management and legal experience well qualifies her to serve on our Board.

Marshall E. Eisenberg Director, age 71.74 Mr. Eisenberg has served on our Board of Directors since November 2006. Mr. Eisenberg is a founding partner of the Chicago law firm of Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP and has been a member of the firm'sfirm’s Executive Committee for the past 30 years. Mr. Eisenberg is a director ofJel-Sert Company and was formerly a director of Ygomi, Inc. and Engineered Controls International, Inc. Mr. Eisenberg has served on the Board of Visitors of the University of the Illinois College of Law. Mr. Eisenberg received his J.D. degree with honors from the University of Illinois College of Law in 1971, where he served as a Notes and Comments Editor of the Law Review and was elected to the Order of the Coif. We believe that Mr. Eisenberg'sEisenberg’s extensive legal experience, including his extensive corporate governance experience, well qualifies him to serve on our Board.

        David W. Gibbs, Diana S. Ferguson Director, age 53.56 Ms. Ferguson was elected to our Board of Directors in January 2019. She has served as a consultant to Cleveland Avenue, LLC, a venture capital investment firm, since September 2015, and in 2018 became its Chief Financial Officer. In addition, Ms. Ferguson has served as a principal of Scarlett Investments, LLC, a private investment firm, since 2013. She also served as Chief Financial Officer of the Chicago Board of Education from February 2010 to May 2011 and as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Folgers Coffee Company from April 2008 to November 2008 when Folgers was sold. Prior to joining Folgers, she was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Merisant Worldwide, Inc. Ms. Ferguson also served as the Chief Financial Officer of Sara Lee Foodservice, a division of Sara Lee Corporation, and in a number of leadership positions at Sara Lee Corporation, including Senior Vice President of Strategy and Corporate Development, as well as Treasurer. We believe that Ms. Ferguson’s executive, management and finance experience well qualifies her to serve on our Board. www.sallybeautyholdings.com 11


LOGO

    Mr. GibbsPROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS Dorlisa K. Flur Director Nominee, age 54 Ms. Flur has served as senior advisor to Southeastern Grocers, Inc. since August 2018 and was previously its Chief Strategy and Transformation Officer from August 2016 to July 2018. Prior to that Ms. Flur served as Executive Vice President, Omnichanel for Belk, Inc. from February 2013 to January 2016, where she integrated stores and eCommerce and also led supply chain. She was previously Vice Chair, Strategy and Chief Administrative Officer at Family Dollar Stores, Inc. where she held a series of top operational roles including real estate, marketing and merchandising as the company scaled from 5000 to 7500 stores. Ms. Flur is a former partner of McKinsey & Company, Inc. where sheco-led its Charlotte, North Carolina office. She currently serves as a director of Hibbett Sports, Inc., where she is a member of its Audit Committee, and United States Cold Storage, a wholly-owned subsidiary of John Swire & Sons, Inc. We believe that Ms. Flur’s executive and management experience, including extensive work driving transformations within mass market retail, well qualifies her to serve on our Board. Linda Heasley Director, age 64 Ms. Heasley has served on our Board of Directors since March 2016. Mr. Gibbs is the PresidentMay 2017 and was Chief FinancialExecutive Officer of Yum! Brands,J.Jill, Inc. from April 2018 until December 2019. Before joining J.Jill, Inc., a position he has held since 2016. In this capacity, Mr. Gibbs has global responsibility for finance, operations, supply chain and information technology for the company. Prior to his current position, Mr. GibbsMs. Heasley served as the Chief Executive Officer of Pizza Hut, a division of Yum! Brands and one ofThe Honey Baked Ham Company, LLC from February 2017 to March 2018. Ms. Heasley served as the world's largest global casual dining chains, a position he held from 2015 to 2016. At Pizza Hut, Mr. Gibbs was responsible for overseeing the Pizza Hut organization, including the development of a global growth strategy. Mr. Gibbs joined the restaurant division of Pepsico in 1989, which later became part of Yum! Brands, and served in a variety of executive roles with Yum! Brands, including Chief StrategyExecutive Officer and President of Lane Bryant, Inc. from February 2013 until February 2017 and as the Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of Yum! Restaurants International.Executive Officer. Prior to this, Ms. Heasley held senior leadership roles at CVS Health Corporation, Timberland LLC, Bath and Body Works and L Brands, Inc. She currently serves as a director at J.Jill, Inc. We believe that Mr. GibbsMs. Heasley’s executive management and financemanagement experience well qualifies himher to serve on our Board.


Table of Contents

 Robert R. McMaster Director, age 68.71 Mr. McMaster has served on our Board of Directors since November 2006 and as ourthe Chairman of theour Board since February 2016. Prior to his appointment as Chairman of the Board, Mr. McMaster served as our Lead Independent Director sincefrom November 2012.2012 until he was named Chairman of the Board. Mr. McMaster has been a director of Carpenter Technology Corporation, a NYSE listed manufacturer and distributor of specialty metals, since 2007, where he currently serves as a member of its audit and strategy committees. Mr. McMaster is also chairman of the audit committee of The Columbus Foundation, a charitable trust and nonprofit corporation. From May 2003 until June 2006, Mr. McMaster previously served as a director of American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. and as chairman of its audit committee and a member of its compensation committee. Mr. McMaster was a director and a member of the audit and compensation committees of Dominion Homes, Inc. from May 2006 to May 2008. From January 2003 until February 2005, Mr. McMaster served, and as Chief Executive Officeran executive officer of ASP Westward, LLC, and ASP Westward, L.P. and from June 1997 until December 2002, Mr. McMaster served as Chief Executive Officer of, Westward Communications Holdings, LLC and Westward Communications, L.P. Mr. McMaster is a former partner of KPMG LLP and a former member of its management committee. He also served as the Senior Financial Advisor to the CEO of Worthington Industries, Inc. from October 2008 to May 2013. We believe that Mr. McMaster'sMcMaster’s long and varied business career, including his extensive accounting experience, well qualifies him to serve on our Board. 12 SALLYBEAUTY HOLDINGS, INC. 2019 Proxy Statement


LOGO

PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS John A. Miller Director, age 63.66 Mr. Miller has served on our Board of Directors since November 2006. Mr. Miller is the President and Chief Executive Officer of North American Corporation, a multi-divisional company specializing in industrial paper products, packaging, printing and other commercial consumables. Mr. Miller has served as the President of North American Corporation since 1987. Mr. Miller is also a director of Wirtz Corporation, where he is a member of its Audit and Compensation Committees;Committees and Breakthru Beverage, where he is a member of its Audit Committee; and Laureate Education, Inc.Committee. We believe that Mr. Miller'sMiller’s long business career, including service as CEO of a large distribution company and his previous service on the board of our previous owner, well qualifies him to serve on our Board.

P. Kelly Mooney Director, age 55 Ms. Mooney has served on our Board of Directors since August 2018. Ms. Mooney joined IBM iX in September 2017 and served as Chief Experience Officer until May 2018. Prior to this, Ms. Mooney held a variety of executive roles with Resource/Ammirati, a digital marketing firm, including Chief Executive Officer from January 2011 to September 2017, President from June 2001 to January 2011, and Chief Experience Officer and Director of Intelligence from March 1995 to May 2001. Ms. Mooney helped grow Resource/Ammirati to be one of the largest independent and largest female-owned digital consultancy agencies in the U.S. by attracting several Fortune 500 clients. During her tenure, she led the development and delivery of integrated marketing, digital experience, ecommerce, mobile and innovation consulting services and was also accountable for Human Resources, IT, Finance and Operations. In 2016, Resource/Ammirati was sold to IBM to become part of IBM iX, one of the world’s largest digital consultancy agencies. She currently serves as a director of J.Jill, Inc. We believe that Ms. Mooney’s executive, management and marketing experience well qualifies her to serve on our Board. Susan R. Mulder Director, age 45.49 Ms. Mulder has served on our Board of Directors since November 2014 and is the Chief Executive Officer of Nic & Zoe Co., a privately-held woman'swoman’s apparel company, a role she has held since April 2012. Under her leadership, the brand has not only grown its wholesale footprint but has alsoand introduced anE-Commerce platform and NIC+ZOE branded retail locations. Ms. Mulder is also a director of Nic & Zoe Co. Prior to joining Nic & Zoe Co., Ms. Mulder was a Senior Partner with McKinsey & Company where she was a leader in the retail and consumer practice for over 10 years specializing in marketing and organization. Ms. Mulder is also a member of the Board of Overseers of Boston Children'sChildren’s Hospital. Ms. Mulder received her MBA from the Harvard Business School with distinction in 1996, and holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree with great distinction from McGill University in Montreal, Quebec. We believe that Ms. Mulder'sMulder’s executive and retail and consumer experience well qualifyqualifies her to serve on our Board. www.sallybeautyholdings.com 13


LOGO

PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS Denise Paulonis Director, age 47 Ms. Paulonis has served on our Board of Directors since May 2018 and is the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Michaels Companies, a position she has held since August 2016. Ms. Paulonis joined Michaels in September 2014 and served as its Senior Vice President, Finance and Treasurer from November 2015 to August 2016 and as its Vice President, Corporate Finance, Investor Relations and Treasury from September 2014 to November 2015. Prior to joining Michaels, Ms. Paulonis held various senior level positions with PEPSICO from August 2009 to September 2014, including Vice President, Financial Planning and Analysis, Frito Lay from August 2013 to September 2014, Vice President, Finance and Strategy, PepsiCo U.S. Sales from January 2011 to July 2013, and Vice President, Global Corporate Strategy from August 2009 to December 2010. We believe that Ms. Paulonis’ executive, management and finance experience well qualifies her to serve on our Board. Edward W. Rabin Director, age 70.73 Mr. Rabin has served on our Board of Directors since November 2006. Mr. Rabin was President of Hyatt Hotels Corporation until his retirement in 2006, having served in various senior management roles since joining the Corporation in 1969. Mr. Rabin iswas a director of PrivateBancorp, Inc., a NASDAQ listed bank holding company, and serves on its audit committee and chairs its compensation committee. He also currently serves as a member offrom December 2003 until the Board of Advisors of First Hospitality Group, Inc., a private company.bank was acquired in June 2017. Mr. Rabin served as lead director of WMS Industries Inc., a formerly NYSE listed company in the gaming industry, from July 2008 until that company was sold in October 2013 and as a member of its audit and compensation committees from December 2005 to October 2013. He also served as a director of SMG Corporation from 1992 through June 2007. Mr. Rabin is a consulting director of the Richard Gray Gallery, Chicago and New York, and was previously a board member of Oneida Holdings, Inc., a private corporation. Mr. Rabin attended the Wharton School of Advanced Business Management and holds an honorary Masters in Business Administration from Florida State University. We believe that Mr. Rabin'sRabin’s executive and management experience, including his experience as president of a large hotel company, well qualifyqualifies him to serve on our Board.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR"“FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE. 14 SALLYBEAUTY HOLDINGS, INC. 2019 Proxy Statement



LOGO

Board Nominee Qualifications and Experience The following table summarizes the key knowledge, skills and experience that qualifies each nominee for our Board of Directors. CEO/Senior Executive Experience Experience as CEO, COO, CFO, President or senior executive of company or partnership, or significant subsidiary, operating division or business unit. Public Board Governance Experience as director on board of publicly-traded company. Independence Satisfy the NYSE’s independence requirements. Financial Expertise Possess the knowledge and experience to be qualified as an “audit committee financial expert.” International Operations Executive-level experience working in organization with global operations. Marketing; Merchandising; Sales Experience in a senior management position responsible for managing a marketing, merchandising and/or sales function. Retail Operations Experience in a senior management position responsible for managing retail operations. Diversity Add perspective through diversity in gender, ethnic background or race. Legal or Consulting Background Brickman ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Baer ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Eisenberg ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Ferguson ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Flur ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Heasley ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ McMaster ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Miller ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Mooney ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Mulder ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Paulonis ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Rabin ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ www.sallybeautyholdings.com 15


LOGO

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE,

Table of Contents


INFORMATION REGARDING CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES

Board Purpose and Structure

The Board oversees, counsels, and directs management in the long-term interests of the Corporation and our stockholders. The Board'sBoard’s responsibilities include:

overseeing the conduct of our business and the assessment of our business and other enterprise risks to evaluate whether the business is being properly managed;

selecting, evaluating the performance of, and determining the compensation of the CEO and other executive officers;

planning for succession with respect to the position of CEO and monitoring management'smanagement’s succession planning for other executive officers; and

overseeing the processes for maintaining our integrity with regard to our financial statements and other public disclosures, and compliance with law and ethics.

Corporate Governance Philosophy

We are committed to conducting our business in a way that reflects best practices and high standards of legal and ethical conduct. To that end, our Board of Directors has approved and oversees a comprehensive system of corporate governance policies and programs. These documents meet or exceed the requirements established by the NYSE listing standards and by the SEC and are reviewed periodically and updated as necessary under the guidance of our Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee to reflect changes in regulatory requirements and evolving oversight practices. These policies embody the principles, policies, processes and practices followed by

Because our Board executive officersis committed to corporate governance best practices, we are committed to integrating responsible sustainability and employees in governing us.corporate responsibility initiatives into our operations and strategic business objectives.

16        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


LOGO

Board Diversity

We value boardroom diversity as integral to effective corporate governance. We believe that board diversity — gender, race, age, insight, background, personality, and professional experience — is a necessity that improves the quality of strategic decision-making and long-term vision, and represents the kind of company we aspire to be.

In the past four years the Board has made meaningful efforts to diversify board membership even further, increasing the percentage of women on our Board from 22 percent to 42 percent. This enhanced diversity has strengthened board-level expertise in critical areas such as: consumer goods and global retailing; corporate financial management; strategic planning and transaction execution; and integrated marketing, digital experience,e-commerce and mobile.

LOGO

Our Board’s leadership by example on diversity is being recognized. In May 2019 the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) named the Company’s Board as a nominee for a 2019 NACD NXT Recognition Award. These awards showcase breakthrough board practices that promote greater diversity and inclusion. And in November 2019 the Company became atwo-time winner of a “Corporate Champions” award, bestowed by the Women’s Forum of New York, which promotes the advancement of women on corporate boards. In 2017, the Women’s Forum honored the company as a “40% Plus Corporate Champion” for “accelerating gender balance and driving meaningful and sustainable change.”

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee recommends to the Board criteria for selection of directors and reviews periodically with the Board the criteria adopted by the Board. Although the Guidelines do not contain a specific policy on diversity, the Board demonstrates — by its own diverse composition — its commitment to diversity and inclusion.

Our Board recognizes that they play a crucial role in setting the tone for the Company’s workplace culture. The Board has encouraged leaders to hire exceptional employees with the diversity that can anticipate the needs and concerns of our customers. By hiring people with diverse voices, listening to them, and responding accordingly, we believe that we are taking the necessary steps to maintain our long-term sustainability.

www.sallybeautyholdings.com        17


LOGO

Corporate Responsibility and ESG — Environmental, Social, Governance

Our Board recognizes that environmental, social, governance and sustainability (“ESG”) issues are of increasing importance to our investors, as well as our customers, and are essential to our Company’s long-term performance and value creation. Our Board is committed to corporate governance best practices and, as such, is committed to integrating responsible ESG initiatives into our operations and strategic business objectives.

BOARD COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT:

As an indication of our Board’s ongoing commitment to ESG issues, in January 2019, the Board adopted a revised charter for the newly-renamed “Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee.” With the charter change, the Board delegated to the Committee authority to oversee the Company’s corporate responsibility andESG-related matters. The revised charter is available at http://www.sallybeautyholdings.com/investor-relations/corporate-governance/governance-documents.

LOGO

CORE ESG VALUES REFLECTED IN OUR CODE OF CONDUCT AND ETHICS:

Our Company’s core values regarding ESG and corporate responsibility are reflected in our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines

        Our Board(the “Code”), which is the standard of Directors has adoptedconduct that applies to all of our (a) Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and (b) Corporate Governance Guidelines that apply to our directors,employees, officers and employees. Copies of these documentsdirectors. The Code reflects the Board’s beliefs about how we should conduct ourselves individually and as a company, and includes the following core values relating to corporate responsibility and ESG matters: conducting our business as a good corporate citizen in compliance with all laws, rules and regulations applicable to us and the chartersconduct of our business; conducting operations with regard to the welfare of our employees and for our Board committees arethe protection of the environment and the general public; and providing equal opportunity to all employees and job applicants.

The Code is available on our website at http://investor.sallybeautyholdings.com and areis available in print to any person, without charge, upon written request to our Vice President of Investor Relations. We intend to disclose on our website any substantive amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, our principal accounting officer or persons performing similar functions. We have not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement the information included on or linked from our website, and you should not consider it to be part of this Proxy Statement.

Director Independence
STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT:

Based on informal discussions with stockholders during the past year, the Board initiated a sustainability materiality assessment of the Company. As a result the Board determined that the Company’s ESG strategy should focus on areas where we can have a material, meaningful impact, which include Energy and Environment; Product Development and Sourcing; and Diversity and Inclusion.

Energy/Environment:We continue to make progress toward reducing our environmental impact by reducing energy usage and increasing energy efficiency. We have implemented a number of initiatives designed in part to reduce our impact on the environment.

In 2019, we rapidly consolidated our energy footprint, transitioning from two home office buildings into one, and closing four distribution centers.

In 2019, we proactively replaced 400 of our most inefficient heating/air condition units in SBS and BSG stores with units having a higher SEER energy efficiency rating.

18        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


LOGO

Our new distribution center in Texas has energy saving features that should result in substantial energy reduction, such as high-flow air rotation units, motion sensor LED lights andR-19 value insulation in the roof.

We installed centralized energy management systems for lighting and heating in 64 stores and, on average, realized 34% reduction in energy per store. Based on the successful pilot, we will be implementing the energy conservation program in 200 stores, targeting those with the historically highest energy usage.

This year, we launched “SBH Going Green”, our company-wide effort to be a better corporate citizen by reducing waste and conserving energy, thereby enhancing the sustainability of our planet and the communities in which we operate. This initiative includes:

removing plastic bags from Sally Beauty, CosmoProf and Armstrong McCall stores (will eliminate ~104 million plastic bags from landfills per year);

removing Styrofoam cups and lids from SBH Corporate Headquarters (will eliminate ~280,000 pieces of Styrofoam from landfills per year); and

launching a cardboard recycling program at SBH Corporate Headquarters(~5-7 tons of cardboard per year).

Product Development and Sourcing: We continue to make progress toward our long-term sustainability goals by using best practices in product development and sourcing. All finished formulas in our owned-brand products are cruelty-free, i.e., not tested on animals. Most (90%) of our owned-brand products are vegan and we aim to have at least 95% of our owned-brand products be vegan in fiscal year 2020. Our Company strives to avoid product formulations that contain parabens and phthalates.

Diversity and Inclusion: Diversity and Inclusion are at the heart of our Company — atthe Board level, throughout ourglobal workforce, and in our shared commitment to serving adiverse customer base and their communities.

At the Board Level:Our Board’s composition shows the Company’s commitment to diversity and inclusion. Board level diversity has enhanced our Company’s board-level expertise and broadened its viewpoint. Having diverse voices on our Board sets the tone to encourage leaders at all levels of the Company to listen to the concerns of our workforce and customers alike. By listening to these voices, and responding accordingly, we are continuously evolving as a socially responsible corporate citizen and are maintaining our long-term sustainability.

Our Board’s inclusive composition and practices are being noticed and championed by others, as noted on page 17.

In Our Workforce: Our Company is 92% Female and 48% racially/ethnically diverse. In 2019 Forbes named our Company one of America’s Best Employers for Diversity.

In 2019, the Company established aDiversity and Inclusion Committee to ensure all associates feel their views, cultures and beliefs are recognized, respected and included and to provide our associates with internal advocacy and support. We recognize the value of diversity and inclusion within our teams to drive the success of the business, as our associates should — and do — reflect the various qualities of our customers and what they desire and expect from our Company.

We scored 75 out of 100 on theHuman Rights Campaign’s annual Corporate Equality Index (CEI), which measures and rates workplaces based on LGBTQ equality with respect to policies and benefits. The Company anticipates making additional adjustments during FY20 to improve our rating.

In Our Customer Base: Our customers span the entire continuum of gender and ethnic diversity. We sell products to treat and style every kind of hair; we deliver a tailored assortment of beauty products that serve the local communities where our 4,150 U.S. and Canadian stores are located. Serving the diverse demographics and needs of our customers drives a culture and workforce that embraces and reflects the communities we serve.

www.sallybeautyholdings.com        19


LOGO

Director Independence

Our Board of Directors is currently comprised of eight tennon-management directors and Mr. Brickman, who is our President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Gary Winterhalter served as a Director and as our Executive Chairman until his retirement on February 2, 2016. Under the Corporate Governance Guidelines, our directors are deemed independent if the Board has made an affirmative determination that such director has no material relationship with us (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us) and such director also satisfies the other independence requirements of the NYSE. Our Board of Directors has affirmatively


Table of Contents

determined that all of our current directors other than Messrs. Winterhalter (prior to his retirement)Mr. Brickman, and Brickman,both new nominees for directors (Mr. Baer and Ms. Flur), satisfy the independence requirements of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as the NYSE, relating to directors. As part of its annual evaluation of director independence, the Board examined (among other things) whether any transactions or relationships exist currently (or existed during the past three years), between each independent director and us, our subsidiaries, affiliates, equity investors, or independent auditors and the nature of those relationships under the relevant NYSE and SEC standards. The Board also examined whether there are (or have been within the past year) any transactions or relationships between each independent director and members of the senior management of the Corporation or its affiliates.

        As part of this evaluation, the Board examined Ms. Nealy Cox's former role with Stroz Friedberg, LLC, a risk management firm that provides cyber-security services to the Company, and the Company's relationship with Stroz and determined that Ms. Nealy Cox does not have a material relationship with the Company as a result of her former role with Stroz or the Company's relationship with Stroz.

All of our directors who serve as members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee are independent as required by the NYSE corporate governance rules. In addition, all of our Audit Committee members also satisfy the separate SEC independence requirements applicable to audit committee members and all of our Compensation Committee members satisfy the additional NYSE independence requirements applicable to compensation committee members.

Nomination of Directors

The Board of Directors is responsible for nominating directors for election by our stockholders and filling any vacancies on the Board of Directors that may occur. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee is responsible for identifying individuals it believes are qualified to become members of the Board of Directors. We anticipate that theThe Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee will considerconsiders recommendations for director nominees from a wide variety of sources, including other members of the Board of Directors, management, stockholders and, if deemed appropriate, from professional search firms. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee will take into account the applicable requirements for directors under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and the listing standards of the NYSE. In addition, the Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee will take into consideration such other factors and criteria as it deems appropriate in evaluating a candidate, including such candidate'scandidate’s judgment, skill, integrity, and business and other experience and the perceived needs of the Board of Directors at that time. With regard to diversity, the Board of Directors and the Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee believe that sound governance of the Corporation requires a wide range of viewpoints. As a result, although the Board of Directors does not have a formal policy regarding board diversity, the Board of Directors and Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee believe that the Board of Directors should be comprised of a well-balanced group of individuals with diverse backgrounds, educations, experiences and skills that contribute to board diversity, and the Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee considers such factors when reviewing potential director nominees.

Stockholder Recommendations or Nominations for Director Candidates

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that our Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee will accept for consideration submissions from stockholders of recommendations for the nomination of directors. Acceptance of a recommendation for consideration does not imply that the Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee will nominate the recommended candidate. Director nominations by a stockholder or group of stockholders for consideration by our stockholders


Table of Contents

at our annual meeting of stockholders, or at a special meeting of our stockholders that includes on its agenda the election of one or more directors, may only be made pursuant to Section 1.06 or Section 1.07, as applicable, of ourBy-Laws or as otherwise provided by law. Nominations pursuant to ourBy-Laws are made by delivering to our Corporate Secretary, within the time frame

20        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


LOGO

described in ourBy-Laws, all of the materials and information that ourBy-Laws require for director nominations by stockholders. All notices of intent to make a nomination for election as a director shall be accompanied by the written consent of each nominee to serve as a director.

Stockholders wishing to recommend or nominate a director must provide a written notice to our Corporate Secretary that includes, among other information required to be provided by ourBy-Laws, (a) the name, age, business address and residence address of the nominee(s), (b) the principal occupation or employment of the nominee(s), (c) such person'sperson’s written consent to serve as a director if elected, (d) the class or series and number of shares of Common Stock which are owned beneficially or of record by the nominee(s), (e) a description of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder and the nominee(s) pursuant to which nominations are to be made by the stockholder, and (f) such other information as the Corporation may reasonably require to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as a director of the Corporation or whether such nominee would be independent under applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations and New York Stock Exchange rules and the Corporation'sCorporation’s publicly disclosed Corporate Governance Guidelines. No person shall be eligible to serve as a director of the Corporation unless nominated in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 1.06 or Section 1.07, as applicable, of our By-Laws andBy-Laws; any nominee proposed by a stockholder not nominated in accordance with Section 1.06 or Section 1.07, as applicable, shall not be considered or acted upon for execution at such meeting. Stockholders'Stockholders’ notice for any proposals requested to be included in the Corporation'sCorporation’s Proxy Statement pursuant toRule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act (including director nominations), must be made in accordance with that rule.

Director Qualifications

In order to be recommended by the Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that each candidate for director must, at a minimum, have integrity, be committed to act in the best interest of all of our stockholders, and be able and willing to devote the required amount of time to our affairs, including attendance at Board of Director meetings. In addition, the candidate cannot jeopardize the independence of a majority of the Board of Directors. The candidate should preferably also have the following qualifications: business experience, demonstrated leadership skills, experience on other corporate boards and skill sets that add to the value of our business.

Annual Election of Directors

In 2014, the Board of Directors implemented abegan the process to declassifyof declassifying the Board andto provide for the annual election of all directors forone-year terms. Our stockholders approved the declassification proposalof the Board at our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders, which resulted in three directors in 2014 being nominated forstockholders. At the annual election for one-year terms. At our 2015 and 2016 annual meetings of stockholders, six directors and seven directors, respectively, were nominated and elected for one-year terms. At this annual meeting each year, all directors of the Board will be elected forone-year terms.

        In light ofAt the retirement of Mr. Winterhalter in February 2016, as well as the appointments to our Board of Mr. Gibbs in March 2016 and Ms. Nealy Cox in August 2016, the Board decided to change its size to nine members beginning in August 2016. At this2020 annual meeting, our stockholders will elect ninetwelve individuals to serve on our Board.


Table of Contents

Mandatory Retirement Age
of Directors

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, it is the policy of the Board that nonon-management director should serve for more than 15 years in that capacity, although the Board may request that a director who would otherwise be due to retire continue his or her service if (a) the policy would result in multiple retirements in any12-month period or (b) the Board deems such service to be in the best interest of our stockholders.

Directors Who Change Their Present Job Responsibility
Responsibilities

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a director who experiences a significant change in job responsibilities or assignment will be required to submit a resignation to the Board. The remaining directors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee, will then determine the appropriateness of continued Board membership.

www.sallybeautyholdings.com        21


LOGO

Stockholder-Director Communications
Board Self Evaluations

        Stockholders and other interested parties may contact any member (or all members) of our Board (including the non-management directors as a group, the Chairman of the Board, any Board committee or any chair of any such committee) by addressing written correspondence to the attention of our Corporate Secretary at 3001 Colorado Boulevard, Denton, Texas 76210. Our Corporate Secretary's office will open all communications received for the sole purpose of determining whether the contents represent a message to our directors. Any contents that legitimately relate to our business and operations and that are not in the nature of advertising, promotions of a product or service, patently offensive material, charitable requests, repetitive materials, or designed to promote a political or similar agenda will be forwarded promptly to the addressee.

Self-Evaluation

The Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee oversees a self-evaluation of the Board each year to determine whether the Board is functioning effectively. In addition, each committee of the Board conducts a self-evaluation each year and reports its findings to the Board.

Board Meetings and Attendance

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our directors are expected to:

spend the time needed to properly discharge their responsibilities;

with respect to ournon-management directors, meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions in which management does not participate, which sessions are chaired by the Chairman of the Board;

with respect to our independent directors, meet at least once a year in an executive session without management, which session is chaired by the Chairman of the Board.

In fiscal 2016,FY19, our Board of Directors met 87 times, our Audit Committee met 65 times, our Compensation Committee met 7 times, our Executive Committee met 86 times, our Marketing Committee met 4 times, and our Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee met 4 times. Our independent directors met in executive session 56 times. During fiscal 2016,FY19, each of our incumbent directors attended at least 75% percent of the total number of meetings of the Board (during his or her service on the Board) and each committee on


Table of Contents

which he or she served (during his or her service on such committee). In 2016,2019, except for Ms. Mulder, all members of the Board who were up for election orre-electionattended the Corporation'sCorporation’s annual meeting of stockholders.

Board Leadership Structure

In accordance with ourBy-Laws, the Board elects our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman, and each of these positions may be held by the same person or may be held by two persons. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board does not have a policy, one way or the other, on whether the role of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer should be separate and, if it is to be separate, whether the Chairman should be selected from thenon-management directors or be a management director. However, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that, if the Chairman of the Board is not an independent director, the independent directors shall appoint from among themselves a Lead Independent Director. The Chairman of the Board is responsible for chairing Board meetings and meetings of stockholders, establishing the agendas for Board meetings along with the Lead Independent Director, if any, and providing information to the Board members in advance of meetings and between meetings. The Lead Independent Director, if any, is responsible for, among other things, coordinating the activities of the independent directors, coordinating with the Chairman to set the agenda for Board meetings, chairing executive sessions of the independent (andnon-management) directors, reviewing and approving meeting schedules and information sent to the Board and liaising with the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer and the other independent directors.

        Prior to Mr. Winterhalter's retirement in February 2016, Mr. Winterhalter served as our Executive Chairman and Mr. McMaster served as our Lead Independent Director. Currently, Mr. Brickman serves as our Chief Executive Officer and Mr. McMaster serves as our Chairman of the Board. Since Mr. McMaster is an independent director, we no longer have a Lead Independent Director. Our Board has determined that this leadership structure is appropriate at this time. In particular, our Board believes that this structure streamlines decision making and enhances accountability. Furthermore, our Board believes that the presence of an independent Chairman of the Board and a majority of independent directors provides effective oversight of management.

Communications with the Board

Stockholders and other interested parties may contact any member (or all members) of our Board (including thenon-management directors as a group, the Chairman of the Board, any Board committee or any chair of any such committee) by addressing written correspondence to the attention of our Corporate Secretary at 3001 Colorado Boulevard, Denton, Texas 76210. Our Corporate Secretary’s office will open all communications received for the

22        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


LOGO

sole purpose of determining whether the contents represent a message to our directors. Any contents that legitimately relate to our business and operations and that are not in the nature of advertising, promotions of a product or service, patently offensive material, charitable requests, repetitive materials, or designed to promote a political or similar agenda will be forwarded promptly to the addressee.

Board'sBoard’s Role in the Risk Management Process

The Board'sBoard’s role in the risk management process is to understand and oversee the Corporation'sCorporation’s strategic plans, the associated risks and the steps that senior management is taking to manage and mitigate those risks. To ensure proper oversight of the risk management process, the Audit Committee outlines our risk principles and management framework and sets high level strategy and risk tolerances. Our risk profile is managed by our Vice PresidentDirector of Internal Audit, an officer appointed by and reporting to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Vice PresidentDirector of Internal Audit meets at least quarterly in executive session with the Audit Committee, and conducts an annual Enterprise Risk Assessment for the Corporation. This assessment is then presented to the Audit Committee (for development of action items and responsible parties for oversight), the full Board (for information) and the Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee (to ensure appropriate Board oversight of the identified risks). This approach is designed to enable the Board and management to establish a mutual understanding of the Corporation'sCorporation’s risk management practices and capabilities, to review the Corporation'sCorporation’s risk exposure and to elevate certain key risks for discussion at the Board level. The Board also meets regularly in executive session without management to discuss a variety of topics, including risk management. Through this system of checks and balances, the Board is able to monitor our risk profile and risk management activities on an ongoing basis. Certain officers who report to the Chief Financial Officer also monitor various financial risks which add to the Corporation'sCorporation’s overall risk management strategy.


Table of Contents

Compensation Risk Assessment

        The Compensation Committee has reviewed with management the design and operation of our incentive compensation arrangements, including the performance objectives and target levels used in connection with incentive awards, for the purpose of assuring that these arrangements do not provide our executives or employees with incentive to engage in business activities or other behavior that would impose unnecessary or excessive risk to the value of the Corporation or the investments of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee considered compensation programs that apply to employees at all levels. This risk assessment process included an assessment of the impact of the Corporation's compensation programs on identified primary business risks (using our annual Enterprise Risk Assessment as a framework) and an analysis of whether and how our compensation programs support, or provide risks to, our corporate strategy. In addition, the Compensation Committee considered the presence of significant risk mitigation factors inherent in our compensation program, such as those described on page 28 under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Management of Compensation-Related Risk."

        Based on the foregoing, the Compensation Committee concluded in its July 2016 meeting that the Corporation's compensation plans, programs and policies do not create incentives that encourage employees to take risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Corporation. We believe that our incentive compensation plans, policies and practices provide appropriate incentives for behaviors that are within the Corporation's ability to effectively identify and manage significant risks, are compatible with effective internal controls and our risk management practices and are supported by the oversight and administration of the Compensation Committee with regard to executive compensation programs.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Pursuant to ourBy-Laws, our Board of Directors has established the following committees:

Compensation Committee;

Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee; and

Executive

Marketing Committee.

The function of each committee is described below.

Each committee, pursuant to its charter adopted by the Board of Directors, consists of at least three members.

Executive Committee. The Executive Committee consists of Messrs. Miller (chair), Brickman, Eisenberg and McMaster. The purpose of the Executive Committee is to assist our Board of Directors with its responsibilities and, except as may be limited by law, our Certificate of Incorporation or ourBy-Laws, to exercise the powers and authority of our Board of Directors when it is not in session. The Executive Committee is governed by the Executive Committee charter. A copy of this charter is available on the corporate governance section of our website at http://investor.sallybeautyholdings.com and is available in print to any person, without charge, upon written request to our Vice President of Investor Relations.

Audit Committee.Committee. The Audit Committee currently consists of Mr. McMaster (chair), Mr. Eisenberg, Ms. Ferguson, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Miller, Mr. Gibbs and Ms. Nealy Cox.Paulonis. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate, that each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements of the NYSE andRule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and that each of Mr. Eisenberg, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. McMaster, Mr. Miller, and Mr. GibbsMs. Paulonis qualifies as an "audit“audit committee financial expert"expert” under SEC rules.

The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities for:


LOGO

the performance of our internal audit function and independent auditors;


Table of Contents

    our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

our information technology function;

preparation of the report of the Audit Committee required for our annual proxy statements; and

our financing strategy, financial policies and financial condition

        Pre-Approval Policy.    The Audit Committee has established an Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy to pre-approve all permissible audit and non-audit services provided by our independent auditors. We expect that on an annual basis, the Audit Committee will review and provide pre-approval for certain types of services that may be rendered by the independent auditors, together with a budget for the applicable fiscal year. The policy also requires the pre-approval of any fees that are in excess of the amount budgeted by the Audit Committee. The policy contains a provision delegating limited pre-approval authority to the chairman of the Audit Committee in instances when pre-approval is needed prior to a scheduled Audit Committee meeting. The chairman of the Audit Committee is required to report on such pre-approvals at the next scheduled Audit Committee meeting.

The Audit Committee is governed by the Audit Committee charter, which was amended and restated by the Board of Directors on July 30, 2015.charter. A copy of this charter is available on the corporate governance section of our website at http://investor.sallybeautyholdings.com and is available in print to any person, without charge, upon written request to our Vice President of Investor Relations.

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee consists of Mr. Rabin (chair), Ms. Button Bell, Mr. Eisenberg,Heasley, and Ms. Mulder. The Board has determined that each such member meets the independence requirements of the NYSE, as well as the "Non-Employee Director"“Non-Employee Director” requirements underRule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act and the "outside director"“outside director” requirements under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The purpose of the Compensation Committee is to, among other things:

The Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s processes for fulfilling its responsibilities and duties with respect to executive compensation and the role of our executive officers and management in the compensation process are each described under "Compensation“Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Processes for Determining Executive Compensation" beginning on page 28Compensation Decision-Making Process” of this Proxy Statement.


Table of Contents

The Compensation Committee is governed by the Compensation Committee charter, which was amended and restated by the Board of Directors on July 30, 2015.charter. A copy of this charter is available on the corporate governance section of our website at http://investor.sallybeautyholdings.com and is available in print to any person, without charge, upon written request to our Vice President of Investor Relations. Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee may create one or more subcommittees and may delegate, in its discretion, all or a portion of its duties and responsibilities to such subcommittees.

Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee may retain such compensation consultants, outside counsel and other advisors as it may deem appropriate in its sole discretion and it has the sole authority to approve related fees and other retention terms. As described in greater detail in "Compensation“Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Processes for Determining Executive Compensation" beginning on page 28Compensation Decision-Making Process” of this Proxy Statement, the Compensation Committee engages an independent executive compensation consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., or FW Cook, to assist it in its review of our management compensation levels and programs to ensure that our executive compensation program is commensurate with those of public companies similar in size and scope to us. During its engagement, FW Cook has participated in meetings of the Compensation Committee and advised it with respect to compensation trends and practices, plan design and the reasonableness of individual awards. FW Cook has not performed any services for our management.

24        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


LOGO

Nominating, Governance and Corporate Governance Committee.Responsibility Committee. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee consists of Mr. Eisenberg (chair), Mr. McMaster, Ms. MulderHeasley, Ms. Mooney and Mr. Rabin.Ms. Mulder. The Board has determined that each such member meets the independence requirements of the NYSE. The purpose of the Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee is to, among other things:

consider any director candidates recommended by our stockholders pursuant to the procedures described in this proxy statementProxy Statement and in ourBy-Laws;

recommend to our Board of Directors individual directors to serve on our various Board committees;

develop and recommend to our Board of Directors a set of corporate governance principles applicable to us; and

oversee the evaluation of the Board of Directors and management.management; and

 

assist the Board in overseeing the Company’s corporate responsibility and sustainability initiatives.

The Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee is governed by the Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee charter, which was amendedrevised on January 31, 2019 to reflect the Committee’s additional oversight over the Corporation’s corporate responsibility and restated bysustainability initiatives. The Committee periodically reviews the Board of Directors on July 30, 2015.Company’s strategies, activities, policies and communications regarding sustainability and other environmental, social and governance-related matters and makes recommendations to the Board. A copy of this charter is available on the corporate governance section of our website at http://investor.sallybeautyholdings.com and is available in print to any person, without charge, upon written request to our Vice President of Investor Relations.

        Executive Committee.Marketing Committee. The Marketing Committee, which was established in 2019, consists of Ms. Mooney (chair) and Ms. Heasley. The purpose of the ExecutiveMarketing Committee is to assist ouradvise the Board on marketing matters, including overall customer insight, marketing strategy and capability development, and the development and implementation of Directors with its responsibilities and, except as may be limited by law, our Certificate of Incorporation or our By-Laws, to exercise the powers and authority of our Board of Directors when it is not in session. Company’s marketing plan.

The ExecutiveMarketing Committee is governed by the ExecutiveMarketing Committee charter, which was amended and restated by the Board of Directorsadopted on July 30, 2015. The composition of the Executive Committee was revised after the resignation of Mr. Winterhalter on February 2, 2016, and now consists of Mr. Miller (chair) and Messrs. Brickman, Eisenberg and McMaster.April 24, 2019. A copy of this charter is available on the corporate governance section of our website at http://investor.sallybeautyholdings.com and is available in print to any person, without charge, upon written request to our Vice President of Investor Relations.


Table of Contents

Director Indemnification Agreements
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

        Our BoardThe Compensation Committee consists of Directors approvedMr. Rabin (chair), Ms. Heasley, and authorized us to enter into an indemnification agreement with each member of the Board. The indemnification agreement is intended to provide directors with the maximum protection available under applicable law in connection with their services to us.

        Each indemnification agreement provides, among other things, that subject to the procedures set forth therein, we will, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, indemnify an indemnitee if, by reason of such indemnitee's corporate status as a director, such indemnitee incurs any losses, liabilities, judgments, fines, penalties or amounts paid in settlement in connection with any threatened, pending or completed proceeding, whether of a civil, criminal, administrative or investigative nature. In addition, each indemnification agreement provides for the advancement of expenses incurred by an indemnitee, subject to certain exceptions, in connection with any proceeding covered by the indemnification agreement. Each indemnification agreement also requires that we cover an indemnitee under liability insurance available to any of our directors, officers or employees. Our indemnification obligations under these agreements are primary for all claims against our directors.

No Material Proceedings

        As of November 15, 2016, there are no material proceedings to which any of our directors, executive officers or affiliates, or any owner of record or beneficially of more than five percent of our Common Stock (or their associates) is a party adverse to us or any of our subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to us or any of our subsidiaries.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

Ms. Mulder. No member of our current Compensation Committee is or has been one of our officers or employees or has had any relationship requiring disclosure under SEC rules. In addition, during fiscal 2016,FY19, none of our executive officers of which served as:

    a member of the compensation committee (or other board committee performing similar functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors) of another corporation, one of whose executive officers served on the Compensation Committee;

    a director of another corporation, one of whose executive officers served on the Compensation Committee; or

    a member of the compensation committee (or other board committee performing similar functions or, in the absence of such committee, the entire board of directors) of another corporation, one of whose executive officers served as one of our directors.


    Table of Contents


    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
    Compensation Risk Assessment

    The Compensation Committee has reviewed with management the design and operation of our incentive compensation arrangements, including the performance objectives and target levels used in connection with incentive awards, for the purpose of assuring that these arrangements do not provide our executives or employees with

    www.sallybeautyholdings.com        25


    LOGO

    incentive to engage in business activities or other behavior that would impose unnecessary or excessive risk to the value of the Corporation or the investments of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee considered compensation programs that apply to employees at all levels. In addition, the Compensation Committee considered the presence of significant risk mitigation factors inherent in our compensation program, such as those described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Management of Compensation-Related Risk.”

    Based on the foregoing, the Compensation Committee concluded in its April 2019 meeting that the Corporation’s compensation plans, programs and policies do not create incentives that encourage employees to take risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Corporation. We believe that our incentive compensation plans, policies and practices provide appropriate incentives for behaviors that are within the Corporation’s ability to effectively identify and manage significant risks, are compatible with effective internal controls and our risk management practices and are supported by the oversight and administration of the Compensation Committee with regard to executive compensation programs.

    Statement of Policy with respect to Related Party Transactions

    Our Board of Directors recognizes that interested transactions with related parties present a heightened risk of conflicts of interest, or the perception thereof, and therefore it adopted a Statement of Policy with respect to Related Party Transactions, which was amended and restated in July 2016.Transactions. Under this policy, an "interested transaction"“interested transaction”, is defined as any transaction, arrangement or relationship or series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships (including the incurrence or issuance of any indebtedness or the guarantee of indebtedness) in which (1) the aggregate amount involved will or may be reasonably expected to exceed $20,000 in any calendar year, (2) the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries is a participant, and (3) any related party has or will have a direct or indirect interest (other than solely as a result of being a director or a less than ten percent beneficial owner of another entity). Any charitable contribution, grant or endowment by the Corporation to a charitable organization, foundation or university at which a related party'sparty’s only relationship is as an employee, an officer or a director also constitutes an interested transaction. A "related party"“related party” is defined as any person who is or was (since the beginning of the last fiscal year for which the Corporation has filed an Annual Report onForm 10-K and proxy statement, even if such person does not presently serve in that role) (1) anyan officer (including at the Vice President level or above), director or nominee for election as a director of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries, (2) a greater than five percent beneficial owner of any class of the Corporation'sCorporation’s Common Stock or other equity securities, or (3) an immediate family member of any of the foregoing individuals.

    Subject to several exceptions (as described below), all interested transactions must be approved or ratified by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, taking into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the interested transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances, as well as the extent of the related party'sparty’s interest in the transaction. An interested transaction may be approved or ratified if it is determined in good faith that, under all of the circumstances, the transaction is fair to the Corporation. The Audit Committee may impose such conditions as it deems appropriate on the Corporation or the related party in connection with the approval of the transaction.

    No director participates in any discussion or approval of an interested transaction for which he or she is a related party, except to the extent the director provides material information concerning the transaction to the Audit Committee. If an interested transaction remains ongoing, the Audit Committee must review and assess, on at least an annual basis, ongoing relationships with the related party to ensure that the interested transaction remains appropriate. In addition, if an interested transaction involving a member of the Board may constitute an actual or potential director conflict of interest, the General Counsel mustshall notify the Chair of the Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee of such interested transaction.

    Under the policy, the following categories of interested transactions have been deemed by the Audit Committee to bepre-approved, even if in excess of $20,000, unless otherwise specifically determined by the committee: (1) any employment by the Corporation of an officer of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries if the related compensation is approved (or recommended to the Board of Directors for approval) by the Corporation'sCorporation’s Compensation Committee,

    26        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


    LOGO

    (2) any compensation paid to a director if the compensation is consistent with the Corporation'sCorporation’s director compensation policies and is required to be reported in the Corporation'sCorporation’s proxy statement under Item 402, (3) any transaction with another company at which a related party'sparty’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer or director) or beneficial owner of less than ten percent of that company'scompany’s equity, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the greater of $120,000, or two percent of that company'scompany’s total annual revenues, and (4) any transaction where the related party'sparty’s interest arises solely from the


    Table of Contents

    ownership of the Corporation'sCorporation’s Common Stock and all holders of the Corporation'sCorporation’s Common Stock received the same benefit on a pro rata basis (e.g., dividends).

            Prior to July 2016, a "related party transaction" was defined under our previous policy as a transaction between us and any senior officer, director, a stockholder owning in excess of 5% of our Common Stock, a person who is an immediate family member of a senior officer or director, or an entity owned or controlled by any such person, other than (1) transactions available to all employees generally or (2) transactions involving less than $5,000 when aggregated with all similar transactions. Under this prior policy, any related party transaction was required to be approved by the relevant body (as described below) and disclosed to our stockholders as required by SEC rules. If the proposed transaction was not an employment arrangement, the transaction was required to be approved by either (a) the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, if the transaction was on terms comparable to those that could have been obtained in arm's length dealing with an unrelated third party or (b) the disinterested members of our Board of Directors. If the transaction was an employment arrangement, the proposed transaction was required to be approved by the Compensation Committee. In approving, ratifying or rejecting a related party transaction or relationship, the relevant body considered whether the transaction was on terms comparable to those that could have been obtained in arm's length dealings with an unrelated third party. Transactions and relationships that were determined to be related party transactions were disclosed in the Corporation's Proxy Statement in accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act.

    All interested transactions with related parties werethat are required to be disclosed under the SEC’s rules are disclosed in the Corporation'sour Proxy Statement in accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act.Statement. A copy of our Statement of Policy with respect to Related Party Transactions is available on the corporate governance section of our website at http://investor.sallybeautyholdings.com and is available in print to any person, without charge, upon written request to our Vice President of Investor Relations.


    INFORMATION ON THE COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
    Directors’ Compensation and Benefits

    Fiscal 2016FY19 Director Compensation Table(1)

                                                                                                                                                                         

    Name

      Fees Earned or
    Paid in Cash
    ($)
      Stock
    Awards
    ($)(5)
      Total
    ($)
      

    Katherine B. Bell(2)

        43,000  139,986  182,986
      

    Marshall E. Eisenberg

      154,000  139,986  293,986
      

    Diana S. Ferguson(3)

        56,668    93,195  149,863
      

    David W. Gibbs

        91,000  139,986  230,986
      

    Linda Heasley

      104,000  139,986  243,986
      

    Joseph C. Magnacca(4)

      103,000  139,986  242,986
      

    Robert R. McMaster

      372,000  189,998  561,998
      

    John A. Miller

        96,000  139,986  235,986
      

    P. Kelly Mooney

        98,000  139,986  237,986
      

    Susan R. Mulder

      103,000  139,986  242,986
      

    Denise Paulonis

        91,000  139,986  230,986
      

    Edward W. Rabin

      118,000  139,986  257,986

    (1)

    During FY19, we did not grant any stock options to, award anynon-equity incentive plan compensation to, or maintain any pension or deferred compensation arrangements for members of our Board of Directors, and our directors did not receive any compensation that would constitute “All Other Compensation.”

    (2)

    Ms. Bell did not stand forre-election at the 2019 Annual Meeting.

    (3)

    Ms. Ferguson was appointed to the Board on January 31, 2019.

    (4)

    Mr. Magnacca resigned as a director December 2, 2019.

    (5)

    Reflects the grant date fair value of restricted stock unit (RSU) awards, determined in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC Topic 718 Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). The grant date fair value of the RSUs is based on the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant. On November 1, 2018, each director other than Ms. Ferguson and Mr. McMaster received 7,717 RSUs, which stock award had a grant date fair value equal to $139,986. On the date of her appointment, Ms. Ferguson received 5,412 RSUs, which had a grant date fair value equal to $93,195. Mr. McMaster received 10,474 RSUs, which had a grant date fair value equal to $189,998. As of September 30, 2019, the directors beneficially owned RSUs which were vested but not yet delivered in shares in the following amounts: (a) Mr. Eisenberg, 71,943; (b) Ms. Ferguson, 0; (c) Mr. Gibbs, 19,788; (d) Ms. Heasley, 8,167; (e) Mr. Magnacca 15,390; (f) Mr. McMaster, 75,339; (g) Mr. Miller, 48,479; (h) Ms. Mooney, 0; (i) Ms. Mulder, 22,585; (j) Ms. Paulonis, 0; and (k) Mr. Rabin, 58,494.

    www.sallybeautyholdings.com        27


    LOGO

     
      
      
      
      
     
    Name
     Fees Earned or
    Paid in Cash
    ($)

     Stock
    Awards
    ($)(5)

      
     Total
    ($)

     

    Christian A. Brickman(2)

             

    Katherine Button Bell

      79,000  99,991    178,991 

    Erin Nealy Cox(3)

      13,167  16,659    29,826 

    Marshall E. Eisenberg

      121,000  99,991    220,991 

    David W. Gibbs(4)

      44,778  57,897    102,675 

    Robert R. McMaster

      192,333  99,991    292,324 

    John A. Miller

      85,000  99,991    184,991 

    Susan R. Mulder

      87,000  99,991    186,991 

    Edward W. Rabin

      103,000  99,991    202,991 

    Gary G. Winterhalter(2)

              
    (1)
    During our 2016 fiscal year, we did not award any non-equity incentive plan compensation to, or maintain any pension or deferred compensation arrangements for members of our Board of Directors, and our directors did not receive any compensation that would constitute "All Other Compensation."

    Table of Contents

    (2)
    Neither Mr. Brickman nor Mr. Winterhalter received any compensation for their service as a director during our 2016 fiscal year, nor will Mr. Brickman receive compensation for such services going forward. Mr. Winterhalter retired from the Board and as the Executive Chairman of the Corporation on February 2, 2016.

    (3)
    Ms. Nealy Cox was appointed to the Board on August 1, 2016.

    (4)
    Mr. Gibbs was appointed to the Board on March 3, 2016.

    (5)
    Reflects the grant date fair value of restricted stock unit (RSU) awards, determined in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC Topic 718 Stock Compensation ("ASC 718"). The grant date fair value of the RSUs is based on the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant. On October 28, 2015, each director except Mr. Gibbs and Ms. Nealy Cox received 4,264 RSUs, which stock award had a grant date fair value equal to $99,991. On the date of his appointment, Mr. Gibbs received 1,838 RSUs which had a grant date fair value equal to $57,897. On the date of her appointment, Ms. Nealy Cox received 568 RSUs which had a grant date fair value equal to $16,659 As of September 30, 2016, the directors beneficially owned RSUs which were vested but not yet delivered in shares in the following amounts: (a) Mr. Brickman, 8,059; (b) Ms. Button Bell, 13,388; (c) Mr. Eisenberg, 64,226; (d) Mr. McMaster, 59,969; (e) Mr. Miller, 48,479; (f) Ms. Mulder, 5,245; Mr. Rabin, 52,323; Ms Nealy Cox, 540; Mr. Winterhalter does not beneficially own any RSUs. None of the directors received a stock option grant as compensation for their service as a director in fiscal 2016.

    Narrative Discussion of Director Compensation Table

    The following is a narrative discussion of the material factors which we believe are necessary to understand the information disclosed in the Director Compensation Table.

    Cash Compensation

            In fiscal 2016 and pursuant to the The Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated Independent Director Compensation Policy which(the “Director Compensation Policy”) governs the compensation paid to our independent directors and it was amended and restatedlast revised in both February 2016 and September 2016, and which we referOctober 2018 following FW Cook’sbi-annual review of our director compensation program. The new Director Compensation Policy became effective October 1, 2018.

    Cash Compensation

    In FY19, pursuant to as ourthe Director Compensation Policy, each of our independent directors received an annual cash retainer of $55,000,$70,000, payable in advance in four quarterly installments. Forin-person Board or committee meetings during our 2016 fiscal year,FY19, each independent director in attendance received $2,000 per meeting. For telephonic Board or committee meetings for which minutes were kept, each independent director in attendance received $1,000 per meeting. The February 2016 and September 2016 amendments of the policy did not change the amount of cash retainer which our independent directors receive, nor the attendance fees for in-person or telephonic Board meetings.

    Additional annual cash retainers were paid to each independent director who served as the Chairman of the Board (Mr. McMaster, who was the Lead Independent Director prior to February 1, 2016)McMaster) or chairperson of the Audit Committee (Mr. McMaster), Compensation Committee (Mr. Rabin), Marketing Committee (Ms. Mooney) or the Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceResponsibility Committee (Mr. Eisenberg). The following table sets forth the cash retainers for services rendered in FY19:

    Board Role

    Cash Retainer
    Amount

    Non-Executive Chairman

    $150,000

    Audit Committee

      $25,000

    Compensation Committee

      $20,000

    Marketing Committee

      $12,000

    Nominating, Governance & Corporate Responsibility Committee

      $18,000

    In connection withNovember 2018 the retirement ofCompensation Committee awarded Mr. Winterhalter and the replacement of the position of Lead Independent Director with non-executive Chairman of the Board in February 2016, the Board revised the policy to provide forMcMaster an annualadditional $100,000Non-Executive cash retainer, and Mr. Eisenberg an additional cash payment of $100,000$32,000, each for the Chairman of the Board and removed the retainer for the Lead Independent Director. In September 2016, the Board revised the policy to provide for an increase in the annual cash retainer for the Chairman of the Board and the chairpersons of the Audit Committee,


    Table of Contents

    Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee,his increased responsibilities to the amounts set forth below effective October 1, 2016:Company during FY18. Both awards were paid out in FY19.

    Non-Executive Chairman (between February 1 and October 1, 2016)

     $100,000 

    Non-Executive Chairman (effective as of October 1, 2016)

     $150,000 

    Lead Independent Director (prior to February 1, 2016)

     $35,000 

    Audit Committee (effective prior to October 1, 2016)

     $20,000 

    Audit Committee (effective as of October 1, 2016)

     $25,000 

    Compensation Committee (effective prior to October 1, 2016)

     $16,000 

    Compensation Committee (effective as of October 1, 2016)

     $20,000 

    Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee (effective prior to October 1, 2016)

     $16,000 

    Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee (effective as of October 1, 2016)

     $18,000 

    Equity-Based Compensation

    Pursuant to our Director Compensation Policy, each independent director, with the exception of Mr. McMaster, was granted an annual equity-based retainer award with a value at the time of issuancegrant of approximately $100,000.$140,000. Mr. McMaster was granted an annual equity-based retainer award with a value at the time of grant of $190,000. For fiscal year 2016,FY19, these awards were granted in accordance with the 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan in the form of RSUs that vested on September 30, 2016,2019, the last day of the fiscal year, subject to the director'sdirector’s continued service on the Board on such date. On October 28, 2015,November 5, 2019, each independent director, with the exception of Mr. McMaster received an award of 4,264 RSUs except8,408 RSUs. Mr. Gibbs whoMcMaster received a proratedan award of 1,838 RSUs when he was appointed on March 3, 2016 and Ms. Nealy Cox who received a prorated award of 568 RSUs when she was appointed on August 1, 2016.11,411 RSUs. As provided in the Director Compensation Policy, each independent director may elect to defer delivery of the shares of Common Stock that would otherwise be due on the vesting date until a later date specified by the independent director. Deferred shares are retained by us as deferred stock units that are distributed on the date specified by the independent director. If an independent director does not make such election, he or she will receive shares of Common Stock in settlement of the RSU on the vesting date. Vesting accelerates on apro-rata basis in the event of the director'sdirector’s death or disability. Effective October 1, 2016, the Board amended our Director Compensation Policy to provide that each independent director shall receive an annual equity-based retainer award with a value at the time of issuance of approximately $125,000.

    Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines

    Pursuant to our minimum stock ownership guidelines, each independent director must own shares of Common Stock in an amount equal to five times the base annual cash retainer (excluding additional annual cash retainers for the Lead Independent Director (prior to February 1, 2016), the Chairman of the Board (as of February 1, 2016) and committee chairpersons, and all meeting fees). Independent directors are required to achieve the applicable level of ownership within five years of becoming subject to the requirements. Until such time as the required equity ownership is reached, the independent director must retain 100% of the shares of Common

    28        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


    LOGO

    Stock received upon settlement of his or her RSUs. Shares underlying vested RSUs (including deferred shares) count towards the stock ownership total. Unexercised options (whether vested or unvested) and unvested RSUs do not count as stock owned under the guidelines. As of November 15, 2016,September 30, 2019, all of our independent directors, subject to the five-year grace period, were in compliance with our stock ownership and retention guidelines.

    Travel Expense Reimbursement

    Each of our independent directors is entitled to reimbursement for reasonable travel expenses properly incurred in connection with his or her functions and duties as a director. With respect to air travel, reimbursements are limited to the cost of first-class commercial airline tickets for the trip.


    Table of ContentsDirector Indemnification Agreements

    Our Board of Directors approved and authorized us to enter into an indemnification agreement with each member of the Board. The indemnification agreement is intended to provide directors with the maximum protection available under applicable law in connection with their services to us.

    Each indemnification agreement provides, among other things, that subject to the procedures set forth therein, we will, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, indemnify an indemnitee if, by reason of such indemnitee’s corporate status as a director, such indemnitee incurs any losses, liabilities, judgments, fines, penalties or amounts paid in settlement in connection with any threatened, pending or completed proceeding, whether of a civil, criminal, administrative or investigative nature. In addition, each indemnification agreement provides for the advancement of expenses incurred by an indemnitee, subject to certain exceptions, in connection with any proceeding covered by the indemnification agreement. Each indemnification agreement also requires that we cover an indemnitee under liability insurance available to any of our directors, officers or employees. Our indemnification obligations under these agreements are primary for all claims against our directors.

    No Material Proceedings

    As of December 6, 2019 there are no material proceedings to which any of our directors, executive officers or affiliates, or any owner of record or beneficially of more than five percent of our Common Stock (or their associates) is a party adverse to us or any of our subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to us or any of our subsidiaries.

    www.sallybeautyholdings.com        29


    LOGO


    BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMPANY’S STOCK

    The following tables set forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership, as of November 15, 2019, of: (i) our Common Stock by each current director (including director nominees) or executive officer and of all the current directors (including director nominees) and executive officers as a group; and (ii) our Common Stock by each person believed by us (based upon their Schedule 13D or 13G filings with the SEC) to beneficially own more than 5% of the total number of outstanding shares. The number of shares beneficially owned by each person or group as of November 15, 2019, includes shares of Common Stock that such person or group had the right to acquire on or within 60 days after November 15, 2019, including upon the exercise of options. The total number of outstanding shares on which the percentages of share ownership in the tables are based is 116,326,372. All such information is estimated and subject to change. Each outstanding share of Common Stock entitles its holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. Except as specified below, the business address of the persons listed is our headquarters, 3001 Colorado Boulevard, Denton, Texas 76210.

    Ownership of our Common Stock is shown in terms of “beneficial ownership.” Amounts and percentages of Common Stock beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which he has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. More than one person may be considered to beneficially own the same shares. In the table below, unless otherwise noted, a person has sole voting and dispositive power for those shares shown as beneficially owned by such person.

    30        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


    LOGO

    COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
    Securities Owned by Directors and Executive Officers

     In this section

    Name of Beneficial Owner

        Amount and Nature of
    Beneficial Ownership
    of Common Stock(1)
        Percent of Class(2)   
      

    Christian A. Brickman

          1,572,449(3)      1.35%     
      

    Aaron E. Alt

          154,934(4)      *     
      

    Mark G. Spinks

          288,154(5)      *     
      

    Scott C. Sherman

          94,744(6)      *     
      

    John M. Henrich

          53,263(7)      *     
      

    Chad L. Selvidge

          0      *     
      

    Timothy R. Baer

          0      *     
      

    Marshall E. Eisenberg

          154,014(8)      *     
      

    Diana S. Ferguson

          5,412(9)      *     
      

    Dorlisa K. Flur

          0      *     
      

    David W. Gibbs

          21,626(10)      *     
      

    Linda Heasley

          17,478(11)      *     
      

    Joseph C. Magnacca

          15,482(12)      *     
      

    Robert R. McMaster

          128,144(13)      *     
      

    John A. Miller

          305,575(14)      *     
      

    P. Kelly Mooney

          8,434(15)      *     
      

    Susan R. Mulder

          27,165(16)      *     
      

    Denise Paulonis

          10,618(17)      *     
      

    Edward W. Rabin

          190,014(18)      *     
      

    All directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons)

          3,047,506(19)      2.62%     

    (1)

    Except as otherwise noted, the directors and named executive officers, and all directors and executive officers as a group, have sole voting power and sole investment power over the shares listed.

    (2)

    An asterisk indicates that the percentage of Common Stock projected to be beneficially owned by the named individual does not exceed one percent of our Common Stock.

    (3)

    Includes 282,356 shares of Common Stock, 146,735 shares of restricted Common Stock, 1,135,299 shares subject to stock options exercisable currently or within 60 days and 8,059 vested restricted stock units.

    (4)

    Includes 32,686 shares of Common Stock, 72,147 shares of restricted Common Stock and 50,101 shares subject to stock options exercisable currently or within 60 days.

    (5)

    Includes 5,618 shares of Common Stock, 2,283 shares held as a participant in the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan, 22,957 shares of restricted Common Stock and 257,296 shares subject to stock options exercisable currently or within 60 days.

    (6)

    Includes 4,047 shares of Common Stock, 16,902 shares of restricted Common Stock and 73,795 shares subject to stock options exercisable currently or within 60 days.

    (7)

    Includes 1,751 shares of Common Stock, 12,449 shares of restricted Common Stock and 39,063 shares subject to stock options exercisable currently or within 60 days.

    (8)

    Includes 72,071 shares of Common Stock, 10,000 shares of Common Stock held by such person as trustee of a trust for the benefit of himself and 71,943 vested restricted stock units.

    (9)

    Includes 5,412 shares of Common Stock.

    (10)

    Includes 1,838 shares of Common Stock and 19,788 vested restricted stock units.

    (11)

    Includes 9,311 shares of Common Stock and 8,167 vested restricted stock units.

    (12)

    Includes 92 shares of Common Stock and 15,390 vested restricted stock units.

    (13)

    Includes 52,805 shares of Common Stock and 75,339 vested restricted stock units.

    (14)

    Includes 59,590 shares of Common Stock, 197,506 shares held by the Rellim Investment Company LLC, a single member LLC owned by a trust for the benefit of himself and disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein and 48,479 vested restricted stock units.

    (15)

    Includes 8,434 shares of Common Stock.

    (16)

    Includes 4,580 shares of Common Stock and 22,585 vested restricted stock units.

    (17)

    Includes 10,618 shares of Common Stock.

    (18)

    Includes 25,520 shares of Common Stock, 89,000 shares of Common Stock held by such person as trustee of a trust for the benefit of himself, 17,000 shares of Common Stock held by wife and 58,494 vested restricted stock units.

    (19)

    Includes 576,729 shares of Common Stock, 271,190 shares of restricted Common Stock, 2,283 shares held as participants in the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan, 1,555,554 shares subject to stock options exercisable currently or within 60 days and 328,244 vested restricted stock units. Such persons have shared voting and investment power with respect to 313,506 shares.

    www.sallybeautyholdings.com        31


    LOGO

    Persons Owning More than Five-Percent of the Company’s Common Stock

    Name of Beneficial OwnerAmount and Nature of
    Beneficial Ownership of
    Common Stock
    Percent of Class

    ArrowMark Colorado Holdings LLC

    100 Fillmore Street, Denver, CO 80206

    16,642,309 (1)14.31%

    BlackRock, Inc.

    55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055

    14,219,957 (2)12.22%

    FMR LLC

    245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210

    13,584,045 (3)11.68%

    Eaton Vance Management

    2 International Place, Boston, MA 02110

    13,490,437 (4)11.60%

    The Vanguard Group

    100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355

    11,141,960 (5)  9.58%

    Champlain Investment Partners, LLC

    180 Battery St., Burlington, VT 05401

      7,467,940 (6)  6.42%

    Massachusetts Financial Services Company

    111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02199

      6,922,616 (7)  5.95%

    (1)

    Based solely on information provided on that certain Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 3) dated October 31, 2019, which reflects sole voting power with respect to 16,642,309 shares and shared voting power with respect to 0 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 16,642,309 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares beneficially owned directly by ArrowMark Colorado Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

    (2)

    Based solely on information provided on that certain Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 3) dated December 31, 2018, which reflects sole voting power with respect to 13,913,961 shares and shared voting power with respect to 0 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 14,219,957 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares beneficially owned by BlackRock, Inc., a Delaware corporation; BlackRock, Inc. filed as a parent holding company in accordance with Rule13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(G).

    (3)

    Based solely on information provided on that certain Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 5) dated December 31, 2018, which reflects sole voting power with respect to 1,339,013 shares and shared voting power with respect to 0 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 13,584,045 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares beneficially owned by FMR LLC; FMR LLC filed as a parent holding company in accordance withSection 240.13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(G).

    (4)

    Based solely on information provided on that certain Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 8) dated December 31, 2018, which reflects sole voting power with respect to 13,490,437 shares and shared voting power with respect to 0 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 13,490,437 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares beneficially owned by Eaton Vance Management, a Massachusetts business trust.

    (5)

    Based solely on information provided on that certain Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 5) dated December 31, 2018, which reflects sole voting power with respect to 153,872 shares and shared voting power with respect to 17,513 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 10,983,301 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 158,659 shares beneficially owned by The Vanguard Group, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation.

    (6)

    Based solely on information provided on that certain Schedule 13G dated December 31, 2018, which reflects sole voting power with respect to 6,048,350 shares and shared voting power with respect to 0 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 7,467,940 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares beneficially owned by Champlain Investment Partners, LLC, a Vermont limited liability company.

    (7)

    Based solely on information provided on that certain Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 8) dated December 31, 2018, which reflects sole voting power with respect to 6,460,363 shares and shared voting power with respect to 0 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 6,922,616 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares beneficially owned by Massachusetts Financial Services Company, a Delaware corporation, and/or certain othernon-reporting entities.

    32        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


    LOGO

    PROPOSAL 2—ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

    Pursuant to SEC rules, the Corporation is providing in this Proxy Statement we explain how oura separate resolution, subject to an advisory(non-binding) vote, to approve the compensation of its named executive officers. This proposal is commonly referred to as a “Say on Pay” proposal. As required by these rules, the Board invites you to review carefully the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 36 and the tabular and other disclosures on compensation under Executive Compensation beginning on page 36, and cast a vote “FOR” the Corporation’s executive compensation programs through the following resolution:

    “Resolved, that the stockholders approve the compensation of the Corporation’s named executive officers, including the Corporation’s compensation practices and principles and their implementation, as discussed and disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and any narrative executive compensation disclosure contained in this Proxy Statement.”

    As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 36, the Board of Directors believes that the Corporation’s long-term success depends in large measure on the talents of our employees. The Corporation’s compensation system plays a significant role in our ability to attract, retain, and motivate the highest quality workforce. The Board believes that its current compensation program uses a balanced mix of base salary, and annual and long-term incentives to attract and retain highly qualified executives; the compensation program also maintains a strong relationship between executive compensation and performance, thereby aligning the interests of the Corporation’s executive officers with those of its stockholders.

    This vote is advisory and will not be binding on the Corporation. While the vote does not bind the Board to any particular action, the Board values the input of the stockholders, and will take into account the outcome of this vote in considering future compensation arrangements. The Corporation strongly encourages all stockholders to vote on this matter.

    THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL 2.

    www.sallybeautyholdings.com        33


    LOGO

    EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

    The executive officers of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., their ages (as of December 18, 2019), and their positions for at least the last five years are as follows:

    LOGO

    Christian A. Brickman

    President and Chief Executive Officer

    Christian A. Brickman, 55, has been our President and Chief Executive Officer since February 2015 and a member of our Board since September 2012. Prior to being appointed to his current role, Mr. Brickman served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation from June 2014 to February 2015. Prior to joining the Corporation, Mr. Brickman served as President of Kimberly-Clark

    International from May 2012 to February 2014, where he led the Corporation’s international consumer business in all operations. From August 2010 to May 2012, Mr. Brickman served as President of Kimberly-Clark Professional. From 2008 to 2010, Mr. Brickman served as Chief Strategy Officer and played a key role in the development and implementation of Kimberly-Clark’s strategic plans and processes to enhance enterprise growth initiatives. Prior to joining Kimberly-Clark, Mr. Brickman was a Principal in McKinsey & Company’s Dallas, Texas, office and a leader in the firm’s consumer packaged goods and operations practices. Before joining McKinsey, Mr. Brickman was President and CEO of Whitlock Packaging, the largest non-carbonated beverage co-packing company in the United States, from 1998 to 2001. From 1994 to 1998, he was with Guinness/United Distillers, initially as Vice President of Strategic Planning for the Americas region and then as General Manager for Guinness Brewing Worldwide’s Latin America region. Mr. Brickman was awarded an advanced bachelor’s degree in economics in 1986 from Occidental College in Los Angeles where he graduated with honors, Phi Beta Kappa and cum laude.

    LOGO

    Aaron E. Alt

    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and President, Sally Beauty Supply

    Aaron E. Alt, 48, has been our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and President, Sally Beauty Supply since October 2018. Mr. Alt was our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer from May 2018 to October 2018. Prior to his appointment with the Company, Mr. Alt held various executive leadership roles at Target Corporation, including Senior Vice

    President, Operations from March 2017 to May 2018; Senior Vice President Grocery Transformation from January 2016 to March 2017; Chief Executive Officer, Target Canada Co. from January 2015 to May 2018; Senior Vice President, Finance from August 2015 to January 2016; Senior Vice President, Tax and Treasurer from March 2015 to August 2015; Senior Vice President, Business Development, Risk Management, Tax and Treasurer from October 2013 to March 2015; and Senior Vice President, Business Development and Treasurer from September 2012 to October 2013. Prior to joining Target Corporation, Mr. Alt held several senior level positions with Sara Lee Corporation, including General Manager – Ball Park Brands from 2011-2012; Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer – North American Retail and Foodservice from 2009 to 2011; Senior Vice President – Corporate Development from 2006 to 2009 and Vice President, Senior Corporate Counsel – Corporate Development and Finance from 2004 to 2006. Mr. Alt was a partner at the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis in London from 2003 to 2004. Mr. Alt holds a J.D. from Harvard Law School, an M.B.A. from J.L. Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University and a B.A. in History and Political Science from Northwestern University.

    LOGO

    Pamela K. Kohn

    Senior Vice President, Chief Merchandising Officer

    Pamela K. Kohn, 55, has been our Senior Vice President, Chief Merchandising Officer since October 2019. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Kohn was the Executive Vice President, Chief Merchandising and Marketing Officer for the Family Dollar Division of Dollar Tree, Inc. from September 2017 to June 2019, and served in the same capacity for The Fresh Market from January 2016 to

    December 2016. Ms. Kohn was Executive Vice President and President of Walmart U.S. Realty from 2013 to 2015 and, prior to that, Ms. Kohn served as a senior executive in a number of areas for Walmart, including Merchandising, Merchandise Services, Global Sourcing, Supply Chain and Store Operations. Ms. Kohn holds a B.A. degree in Sociology from Northwestern University.

    34        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


    LOGO

    LOGO

    Mark G. Spinks

    President, Beauty Systems Group

    Mark G. Spinks, 58, has been the President of Beauty Systems Group LLC since July 2015. Mr. Spinks previously held a number of positions of increasing responsibility with us. Mr. Spinks was most recently the Chief Operating Officer of Beauty Systems Group LLC, a position he has served in since September 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Spinks was the Vice President of Operations/GM for the

    Corporation’s Armstrong McCall franchise business, a position he held for five and a half years, and prior to that was the Director of Business Development for the Corporation for almost four years. Mr. Spinks received a B.A. in Economics and Criminal Justice from Indiana University.

    LOGO

    Scott C. Sherman

    Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer

    Scott Sherman, 41, has been our Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since October 2017. Mr. Sherman has held various senior level positions with the Corporation since October 2012, including Group Vice President, Human Resources from November 2016 to September 2017, Vice President and Deputy General Counsel from October 2013 to November 2016 and

    Associate General Counsel, Employment and Litigation from October 2012 to October 2013. Prior to joining the Corporation, Mr. Sherman was a Shareholder/Attorney at Littler Mendelson, P.C. where he represented clients in all aspects of labor and employment law. Mr. Sherman received his J.D. from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and his B.A. in Political Science from Pennsylvania State University.

    LOGO

    John M. Henrich

    Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

    John Henrich, 45, has been our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since June 2019. Mr. Henrich has held various senior level positions with the Corporation since January 2012, including Interim General Counsel and Secretary since January 2018; Vice President, Deputy General Counsel, Head of Regulatory from October 2016 to January 2018; Vice President,

    Associate General Counsel from October 2015 to October 2016; and Senior Counsel from January 2012 to October 2015. Prior to joining the Corporation, Mr. Henrich was Senior Counsel at Accor Hospitality. Mr. Henrich received his J.D. from Fordham University School of Law and his B.A. in History from Columbia University in the City of New York.

    www.sallybeautyholdings.com        35


    LOGO

    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

    Compensation Discussion and Analysis

    The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) explains how the Company’s executive compensation program is designed and operateoperates with respect to the following named executive officers (whom we refer to as our "named executive officers")(NEOs) for the fiscal year 2019 (FY19):

      Christian A. Brickman, our President and Chief Executive Officer,

      Mark J. Flaherty, our former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (who separated from the Company on September 30, 2016),

      Matthew O. Haltom, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary;

      Mark G. Spinks, our President of Beauty Systems Group LLC (BSG); and

      Sharon M. Leite, our President of Sally Beauty Supply LLC (who was appointed effective February 1, 2016).

     

    Current NEOs
    LOGO

    Christian A. Brickman

    President and Chief Executive Officer

    LOGO

    Aaron E. Alt

    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

    and President, Sally Beauty Supply

    LOGO

    Mark G. Spinks

    President, Beauty Systems Group

    LOGO

    Scott C. Sherman

    Senior Vice President and Chief Human

    Resources Officer

    LOGO

    John M. Henrich

    Senior Vice President, General Counsel and

    Secretary

    Former NEO

    Chad L. Selvidge

    Former Senior Vice President and Chief

    Merchandising Officer

    For a complete understanding of our executive compensation program, this Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCD&A should be read in conjunction with the Summary “Executive Compensation—Compensation Table and other compensation disclosures included on pages 45-58Tables” of this Proxy Statement.

    36        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


    LOGO

    Executive OverviewEXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    Our Business

            We are the largestSally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: SBH) is an international specialty retailer and distributor of professional beauty supplies inwith revenues of approximately $3.9 billion annually. Through the U.S. based on store count. We operate primarily through two business units, Sally Beauty Supply (Sally) and Beauty Systems Group or BSG. Through Sally Beauty Supply and BSG (which primarily operates stores under the CosmoProf service mark), we operated a multi-channel platform of 4,937 stores and supplied 182 franchised stores primarily in North America, South America and selected European countries, as of September 30, 2016. Within BSG, we also have one of the largest networks of professional distributor sales consultants in North America, with approximately 936 professional distributor sales consultants who sell directly to salons and salon professionals. Sally Beauty Supply stores target retail consumers and salon professionals, while BSG exclusively targets salons and salon professionals.

    Fiscal 2016 Business Highlights

            Fiscal 2016 was a solid year for(BSG) businesses, the Company with year-over-year growth in consolidated saleshas operations throughout the United States, Puerto Rico, Canada, Mexico, Chile, Peru, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Spain and EBITDA. DespiteGermany. Sally stores offer products for hair color, hair care, skin care, and nails through proprietary brands such as Ion®, Generic Value Products®, Beyond the impact from unfavorable foreign currency exchange, sales grew in both our BSGZone® and Sally Beauty Supply businesses and segment operating earnings also showed improvement from the prior year. Some of the key metrics regarding our performance are:


    Table of Contents

    Fiscal 2016 saw growth in sales, representing a 3.1% increase over fiscal 2015:

    GRAPHIC


    *
    For a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP, financial measure, see Exhibit 99.1 to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2016.

            Our GAAP diluted earnings per share were $1.50, representing a 0.7% increase over fiscal 2015.


    Growth in EPS

    GRAPHIC


    *
    For a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP, financial measure, see Exhibit 99.1 to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2016.

            Additionally, our adjusted EBITDA* increased 2.5% in fiscal 2016, to $627.7 million.


    Table of Contents

    Executive Management Transition

            Pursuant to our previously announced executive transition plan, Mr. Gary Winterhalter served as our Executive Chairman from February 1, 2015 until his retirement on February 2, 2016. As Executive Chairman, Mr. Winterhalter performed such duties as are customary for that position,Silk Elements® as well as any duties reasonably requestedprofessional lines such as Wella®, Clairol®, OPI®, Conair® and Hot Shot Tools®. BSG stores, branded as CosmoProf or Armstrong McCall stores, along with its outside sales consultants, sell professionally branded products including Paul Mitchell®, Wella®, Matrix®, Schwarzkopf®, Kenra®, Goldwell®, Joico® and CHI®, intended for use in salons and for resale by salons to retail consumers.

    Over the Chief Executive Officer or our Board. On February 2, 2016, Mr. Winterhalter also retired as a director oflast several years, the Corporation.

            On January 4, 2016, our Board appointed Ms. Sharon M. Leite as President of Sally Beauty Supply LLC, effective February 1, 2016. Prior to Ms. Leite's appointment, the position of President of Sally Beauty Supply LLC hadretail and beauty sector has changed significantly. There has been vacant since the resignation of Tobin Anderson on May 14, 2014.

    2016 Executive Compensation Highlights

      Executive compensation was primarily delivered through a combination of base salary, annual incentives and long-term incentivesincreased competition in the form of stock optionsbeauty space, retailers have increased investments in stores and performance-based restricted stock units (PBRSUs). Our program closely links realized compensationtechnology, customers have had a desire for a more convenient omni-channel shopping experience, and there have been rising labor costs and a tighter job market. We have responded with these four strategic initiatives to the achievement of financial objectives and increases in the Corporation's stock price. Forty percent of Mr. Brickman's fiscal 2016 target compensation was performance-based and contingent upon the achievement of financial performance objectives.reignite growth:

      FY19 Company Strategies and Performance

         Playing to win with our customers

         We continued to build our innovation pipeline with new exciting brands such as the vivid color lines ofArctic Fox andGood Dye Young in Sally and the prestigious color and care brand,Pravana, and Swedish vegan brand,Maria Nila, in BSG

         We launched Box Color across the Sally Beauty network

         We invested in marketing focused on building awareness and education of these brands

         Improving our retail fundamentals

         We launched our new Sally Beauty Rewards Loyalty Program, with over 15.9 million active members (and growing . . .)

         We completed the installation of a newstate-of-the-art POS system to over 1,400 Sally and CosmoProf stores

         We launched phase one of JDA, our new merchandising and supply chain platform

         We optimized our supply chain footprint and transportation network to enhance speed and efficiency

         We tested new store concepts for both business units

         Advancing our digital commerce capabilities

         We launched the redesigned mobile-first website for Sally

         We launched the new Sally Beauty app which allows our consumers to access their loyalty points and shop directly from the app

         We enhanced the CosmoProf app to remove friction from the buying experience for our pro customers

         Continuing to drive costs out of the business

         We worked hard all year to find efficiencies and savings in how we operate our business

      LOGO

      (1)   Please see Appendix 1 for a reconciliation ofnon-GAAP numbers.

      (2)   Please see“Annual Incentive” section of this CD&A for Adjusted Operating Income definition and“Long-Term Incentives” section of this CD&A for3-Year Average ROIC definition.

      www.sallybeautyholdings.com        37


    LOGO

    FY19 Changes

    NEO Changes

      On October 19, 2018, Aaron E. Alt was promoted to President, Sally Beauty Supply, in addition to his role as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

      On June 10, 2019, John M. Henrich was promoted to Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.

      On June 27, 2019, Chad L. Selvidge, our Former Senior Vice President and Chief Merchandising Officer, separated from the Company.

    Program Changes

      We adjusted our annual incentive performance metrics (replaced total sales metric with same store sales growth), weightings and payout scales in order to align with investor focus and incent employees to grow primary sales channels.

    FY19 NEO Pay

      Increased base salaries for NEOs between 2.0% to 2.3% (other than Messrs. Alt and Henrich), consistent with market data from our peer group. Increased Mr. Alt’s base salary from $600,000 to $700,000 and Mr. Henrich’s base salary from $317,200 to $385,000 based on their promotions and market data from our peer group.

      Increased Mr. Alt’s annual incentive target award percentage from 60% to 80% and Mr. Henrich’s target award percentage from 40% to 60% based on their promotions and market data from our peer group. Also increased Mr. Spinks’ target award percentage from 60% to 70% to better align with market data from our peer group.

      While we continue to make progress on our strategic initiatives, overall our financial performance was below expectations and resulted in below target payouts for annual incentive awards (except for Sally) and forfeiture of theFY17-19 performance-based restricted stock units (PBRSUs).

       Annual incentive award payouts ranged from 63.82% to 108.33% of target, based on achievement of same store sales growth, adjusted operating income and strategic initiatives (weightings varied based on business unit).

      Granted long-term incentive (equity) awards in the form of 34% stock options (options), 33% PBRSUs, and 33% time-based restricted stock awards (TBRSAs).

      PBRSU performance metrics comprised of 60% adjusted operating income growth and 40% return on invested capital (ROIC) based on performance over a3-year period.

    Corporate

    Governance

    WHAT WE DOWHAT WE DO NOT DO

      Closely align pay with performance

      Retain an independent compensation consultant

      Conduct an annual review of our peer group composition

      Conduct an annual review of our executive officer performance and compensation

      Conduct an annual review of our incentive compensation design

      Limit incentive compensation with a maximum payout/cap

      Maintain a comprehensive recoupment/clawback policy

      Require a minimum vesting period for equity

      Maintain equity ownership guidelines and retention requirements

     No employment agreements for executive officers

     No discounting or repricing of stock options without stockholder approval

     No pledging or hedging transactions with respect to Company stock

     No “single trigger”change-in-control severance benefits

     No “single trigger”change-in-control equity acceleration for assumed awards (other than PBRSUs, which vest at target)

     No 280G excise tax“gross-ups”

     No excessive executive benefits or perquisites

     No tax“gross-ups” for executive benefits or perquisites (other than reimbursement of certainnew-hire benefits)

     No compensation programs that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company

    38        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


    LOGO



    In fiscal year 2016, we failed to meet certain of the financial performance targets under the annual incentive plan. As a result, all of the named executive officers other than Mr. Spinks earned below-target annual incentive payments for fiscal 2016. As described in greater detail later in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Mr. Spinks' annual incentive payment is tied solely to financial performance metrics for BSG, which achieved above-target results for fiscal 2016; accordingly Mr. Spinks' earned an above-target annual incentive payment.

    Under our long-term incentive program, employees at the Vice President level and above received a significant portion (1/3rd) of their fiscal 2016 equity-based compensation in the form of PBRSUs and the remaining portion in the form of time-based stock options (2/3rd).

    Ms. Leite received certain sign-on benefits in connection with her commencement of employment with us, including a cash sign-on bonus of $100,000, an award of non-qualified stock options with a grant date value of approximately $312,500 and an award of restricted stock with a grant date value of approximately $312,500. In determining to provide these sign-on benefits, our Compensation Committee considered both the need to offer a competitive compensation package to encourage Ms. Leite to accept employment with us, as well as the need to provide her with one-time awards that would address equity compensation granted by her then-current employer that she would forfeit in connection with her termination of employment.

    On September 30, 2016, Mark J. Flaherty resigned from his position as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. In order to obtain Mr. Flaherty's agreement to certain restrictive covenants following his resignation, including confidentiality, non-disparagement and non-solicitation provisions, as well as a release of potential claims, we entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Flaherty. Pursuant to that agreement, Mr. Flaherty will continue to receive his base salary and reimbursement for the cost of health insurance continuation for fifteen months. The above-described benefits are conditioned upon Mr. Flaherty's continued compliance with the aforementioned restrictive covenants, which are valuable to us. Notwithstanding that, Mr. Flaherty's separation was not the result of any disagreement with the Corporation regarding its operations, policies, practices or otherwise, nor was it the result of any alleged improper dealings or activities by Mr. Flaherty. In determining the appropriate severance amounts for Mr. Flaherty, the Compensation Committee considered the severance payable to comparable executives and also considered the fact that Mr. Flaherty would forfeit a substantial number of previously-granted equity awards in connection with his resignation.

    Table of Contents

      2016 Compensation Governance Highlights
      COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES

              We endeavor to maintain good governance standards including with respect to the oversight of our executive compensation policies and practices. The following policies and practices were in effect during fiscal 2016:

      ü
      The Compensation Committee is composed solely of independent directors who have established channels to communicate with stockholders regarding their executive compensation views.

      ü
      The Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant, FW Cook is retained directly by the Compensation Committee and performs no other consulting or other services for us.

      ü
      The Compensation Committee conducts an annual review and approval of our compensation strategy, including a review of our compensation-related risk profile to assure that compensation-related risks are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Corporation.

      ü
      The Compensation Committee reviews tally sheets in connection with making compensation decisions.

      ü
      We have a compensation recoupment policy for the executives that requires current and former executives to return incentive compensation that is subsequently determined not to have been earned.

      ü
      We have a long-term incentive program that provides employees at the Vice President level and above with a significant portion (33%) of their equity-based compensation in the form of PBRSUs, which are subject to a three-year cliff-vesting provision and are payable if we meet sales growth and return on invested capital goals over the three-year period.

      ü
      Minimum vesting requirements under our 2010 Omnibus Plan require that, subject to certain limited exceptions, full-value awards granted to employees either (i) be subject to a minimum vesting period of three years, or one year if the vesting is based on performance criteria, or (ii) be granted solely in exchange for foregone cash compensation.

      ü
      We have meaningful stock ownership and retention guidelines for our executive officers, including the named executive officers, and our independent directors.

      ü
      We prohibit all employees and directors from engaging in any margin trading, pledging or hedging transactions with respect to the Corporation's stock.
      X
      The exercise price of options granted under our 2010 Omnibus Plan is never less than the closing price of our Common Stock on the date of grant.

      X
      We do not provide "single trigger" change-in-control severance benefits.

      X
      With the exception of our PBRSUs, we do not provide "single trigger" change-in-control acceleration for our equity awards. Our equity plans provide for "double trigger" change-in-control vesting for awards assumed by the surviving company (other than PBRSUs, which will vest at target).

      X
      We do not provide 280G excise tax "gross-ups."

      X
      The change in control definition contained in our 2010 Omnibus Plan and severance agreements is not a "liberal" definition that would be activated on mere stockholder approval of a transaction.

      X
      We do not provide excessive perquisites. Our named executive officers participate in the same benefit programs at the same cost as other salaried employees, and receive only minimal perquisites, consisting of reimbursement for an annual physical and, in limited situations, reimbursement for relocation expenses and health insurance premiums (upon hire and only prior to eligibility for coverage under the Corporation's group health plans).

      X
      We do not provide tax "gross-ups" for perquisites or other benefits provided to our executive officers, other than in the case of reimbursement of certain new-hire relocation and health insurance expenses.

      X
      Our plans prohibit the repricing of stock options without stockholder approval.

      X
      We do not maintain compensation programs that we believe create risk reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Corporation.

      Table of Contents

      Philosophy/Objectives of Executive Compensation

      Our Compensation Committee has developed the following set of objectives to guide the design of our executive officer compensation plansprogram and practices, including those for our named executive officers.NEOs. The Compensation Committee considers these objectives when making decisions regarding the forms, mix and amounts of compensation paid to our executive officers:




      Attract, motivate and retain highly qualified individuals. To assure that our compensation arrangements remain competitive with the compensation paid by other employers who compete with us for talent, the Compensation Committee considers peer group information as one input in its decision-making process. In fiscal 2016, we targeted our compensation program to provide total direct compensation opportunities for our named executive officers at approximately the 25th percentile to median of our peer group. The Compensation Committee uses its judgment to vary executive officer pay within the targeted range and from the targeted range based on various factors, such as an executive officer's performance, responsibilities, experience and expected future contributions.


      LOGO



      Align the interests of our executive officers more closely with those of our stockholders. The compensation program for our executives is weighted toward performance-based compensation, with base salary generally being the only component of an executive officer's direct compensation that is fixed each year. Other components, including annual bonus and long-term incentive compensation, are subject to the achievement of financial and strategic business objectives and/or increases in stock price. The Compensation Committee believes this performance-driven compensation will promote our long-term success and lead to increased stockholder returns.



      Manage risk by balancing the time horizon of incentive compensation. Our compensation program is balanced between short- and long-term performance objectives, but always with a view to achieving long-term value for our stockholders. This structure, together with our compensation recoupment policy, encourages and rewards sustained superior performance.

      Attract, motivate and retain highly qualified individuals

      To assure that our compensation arrangements remain competitive with the compensation paid by other employers who compete with us for talent, the Compensation Committee considers peer group information as one input in its decision-making process. In FY19, we targeted our compensation program to provide total direct compensation opportunities for our NEOs at approximately the 25th percentile to median of our peer group. The Compensation Committee uses its judgment to vary executive officer pay within the targeted range and from the targeted range based on various factors, such as an executive officer’s performance, responsibilities, experience and expected future contributions.

      Align the interests of our executive officers more closely with those of our stockholders

      The compensation program for our executives is weighted toward performance-based compensation, with base salary generally being the only component of an executive officer’s direct compensation that is fixed each year. Other components, including the annual and long-term incentives, are earned or derive value from the achievement of financial and strategic business objectives and/or increases in stock price. The Compensation Committee believes this performance-driven compensation will promote our long-term financial success and lead to increased stockholder returns.

      Manage risk by balancing the time horizon of incentive compensation

      Our compensation program is balanced between annual and long-term performance objectives, but always with a view to achieving long-term value for our stockholders. This structure, together with our compensation recoupment policy and equity ownership guidelines, encourages and rewards sustained superior performance.

      We believe our compensation program provides a balanced and stable foundation for achieving our intended objectives. Our compensation philosophy emphasizes team effort, which we believe fosters rapid adjustment and adaptation to fast-changing market conditions and helps to not only achieve our short-termannual and long-term goals, but also aligns the interests of our management team with those of the CorporationCompany and our stockholders.

      Internal Equity

      Internal equity is one factor of many that the Compensation Committee considers in establishing compensation for our executives. While there is no formal policy, the Compensation Committee reviews compensation levels to ensure that appropriate parity exists within the senior management team. The differences in compensation levels among our named executive officersNEOs reflect the significant variations in their relative responsibilities. The responsibilities of the Chief Executive Officer for management and oversight of a global enterprise are significantly higher than those of our other named executive


      Table of Contents

      officers.NEOs. As a result, the pay level and percent of pay at risk based on financial, strategic and stock price performance is commensurately higher for our Chief Executive Officer is commensurately higher than the pay for other officer positions.

      Management of Compensation-Related Risk

              We have designed our compensation programs to avoid excessive risk-taking. The following are some of the features of our program designed to help us appropriately manage business risk:

      Diversification of incentive-related risk by employing a variety of performance measures;



      A balanced weighting of the various performance measures, to avoid excessive attention on achievement of one measure over another;












      An assortment of vehicles for delivering
      compensation, including cash and equity
      based incentives with different time
      horizons, to focus our executives on specific
      objectives that help us achieve our business
      plan and create an alignment with long-term stockholder interests;

      A compensation recoupment policy, as described on page 40;

      Standardized equity grant procedures; and


      LOGO



      Stock ownership and retention guidelines applicable to all executive officers.

      Processes for Determining Executive Compensation

              The Compensation Committee continues to review each element of our executive compensation program, and the methods for determining the types and amounts of compensation, to assure that they help us meet our compensation philosophy and objectives. The Compensation Committee receives input from its independent compensation consultant as well as from members of management, as discussed below.

      Role of Independent Compensation Consultant

              The Compensation Committee retained the services of an independent consultant, FW Cook, to assist in its review of our management and non-employee director compensation levels and programs. As part of this engagement, FW Cook assisted the Compensation Committee in the design of our current compensation program for executives, and continues to advise the Compensation Committee on the program. The Compensation Committee has directly engaged FW Cook to assist with these same services for fiscal 2016, based on FW Cook's experience, expertise and familiarity with our company. FW Cook does not provide any services to our management, and does not provide any service to us, other than with respect to its role as the Compensation Committee's executive compensation consultant.

      Conflicts of Interest Assessment

              The Compensation Committee determined that the work of FW Cook did not raise any conflicts of interest in fiscal 2016. In making this assessment, the Compensation Committee considered the independence factors enumerated in Rule 10C-1(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the NYSE listing standards, including the fact that FW Cook does not provide any other services to the Corporation, the level of fees received from the Corporation as a percentage of FW Cook's total


      Table of Contents

      revenue, policies and procedures employed by FW Cook to prevent conflicts of interest, and whether the individual FW Cook advisers to the Compensation Committee own any stock of the Corporation or have any business or personal relationships with members of the Compensation Committee or our executive officers.

      Market Data/Benchmarking

              FW Cook assisted the Compensation Committee in benchmarking our compensation arrangements and aggregate equity compensation practices against public companies similar in size and scope to our company. FW Cook obtained proxy data from the peer companies described below, as well as comparative compensation surveys of general industrial companies.

              The following 16 specialty retail companies comprised our peer group for fiscal 2016, which we refer to as our "peer companies" or "peer group:"

                  
      Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Fossil Group, Inc.The Michaels Companies, Inc.
      Advance Auto Parts Inc.GNC Holdings Inc.Tractor Supply Company
      Caleres, Inc.O'Reilly Automotive Inc.ULTA Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
      Columbia Sportswear CompanyPier 1 Imports, Inc.Urban Outfitters Inc.
      Dick's Sporting Goods Inc.Tailored Brands, Inc.Williams-Sonoma Inc.
      Foot Locker, Inc.www.sallybeautyholdings.com          39
       

      The Compensation Committee selected the companies in the peer group, after reviewing data on retail companies (including financial metrics, line-of-business, stock performance and employee count for each respective company) and considering several criteria, including the comparability of specialty retailers and the volatility and maturity of potential peers. In terms of size, our revenues and our market capitalization approximated the median of these peer companies. The peer group is different from the peer group for fiscal 2015. In particular, the following companies were added to the peer group: Abercrombie & Fitch Co., Caleres, Inc., Columbia Sportswear Company, Foot Locker, Inc., Fossil Group, Inc., GNC Holdings Inc., Pier 1 Imports, Inc., Tailored Brands, Inc., The Michaels Companies, Inc., ULTA Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc., Urban Outfitters Inc.; the following companies were removed: Dollar Tree, Inc., Family Dollar Stores, Inc., Fred's, Inc., PetSmart, Inc., The Sherwin-Williams Company, Stage Stores, Inc., and Stein Mart, Inc. The aforementioned companies were either removed due to their size, lack of international strategies, and/or acquisition, or added based on their similarity in size, business model and international strategy.


      LOGO

      Role of ManagementFY19 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

              The Compensation Committee also considers the views and insights of our management, including our executive officers, in making compensation decisions. In particular, our Chief Executive Officer recommends to the Compensation Committee the base pay levels and individual compensation targets for each executive officer (other than himself) based on each executive's experience, as well as our Chief Executive Officer's view as to the strategic importance of that executive's role, knowledge and performance. Our Chief Executive Officer's unique insight into our business and day-to-day interaction with our senior executives provides a valuable resource to the Compensation Committee with respect to our executive compensation programs. In addition, the Compensation Committee relied on recommendations made by our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer in selecting the performance metrics and targets for fiscal 2016 annual incentive compensation awards.

              Our Chief Executive Officer as well as other members of management generally attend Compensation Committee meetings to provide input on executive contributions, but no member of management participates in discussions with the Compensation Committee concerning his or her own


      Table of Contents

      compensation. The Compensation Committee also works closely with our internal legal, human resources, and finance personnel in establishing and monitoring our compensation programs. Our Chief Financial Officer provides the Compensation Committee with input on our financial performance and operational issues, and our General Counsel provides input to the Compensation Committee regarding compliance with the laws, regulations and best practices applicable to executive compensation.

      Experience of our Compensation Committee

              The Chair of our Compensation Committee has significant experience in the management of professionals and has served both as chair and as a member of the compensation committees of other publicly-traded companies, and all of our Compensation Committee members have significant experience with regard to the oversight of executive compensation practices of large publicly-traded companies. The Board believes that this experience provides the members of our Compensation Committee with a solid frame of reference within which to evaluate our executive compensation programs and practices.

      Total Compensation Review

              As part of its process for determining the amount and mix of total compensation to be paid to our executive officers in fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee reviewed tally sheets prepared by management containing information for each executive officer regarding, among other things:

        compensation for the last four fiscal years;

        length of service with us;

        the types and amounts of long-term incentive awards granted in the previous four fiscal years;

        the types and amounts of our equity securities, both vested and unvested, owned as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal year;

        the proceeds realized from option exercises during the last four fiscal years;

        perquisites and other compensation paid in the previous fiscal year; and

        the severance and other payments that he or she would receive upon the occurrence of certain events, taking into account the proposed compensation to be paid to such executive officer for the new fiscal year.

              The Compensation Committee believes that this comprehensive annual review is important to an understanding of the total compensation paid and, in certain circumstances, payable to, our executive officers. The Compensation Committee uses these reports to test whether the various forms, targets, mix, and amounts of compensation paid and payable to our executive officers remain consistent with our compensation objectives. Based on its review for fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee believes that the overall compensation of our executive officers was in line with the philosophy and objectives set forth above.

              The Compensation Committee strives to make decisions on each element of executive compensation within the context of an officer's entire compensation package, meaning that a decision on one pay element (such as base salary) impacts decisions made on other pay elements (such as annual and long-term incentives). Based upon input received from FW Cook, the Compensation Committee believes that this program balances both the mix of cash and equity compensation, the mix of currently-paid and longer-term compensation, and the security of severance and change-in-control benefits in a way that furthers the compensation objectives discussed above.


      Table of Contents

      Compensation Components for Fiscal 2016

      The following are the principal elementsprimary components of the fiscal 2016FY19 compensation program for our executive officers, including our named executive officers, each of which are described in greater detail following the chart:NEOs:

      Component



      Element

      Form of
      Compensation


      Purpose

      Performance Criteria

      Actions Taken in
      Fiscal 2016


      Base Salary

        Base SalaryCash  Providing a competitive level of fixed compensation that attracts and retains skilled management, recognizing their respective roles, responsibilities, and experience.  Reviewed annually for increases.
       Increases as follows:


      Mr. Flaherty, 3.0%


      Mr. Haltom, 3.5%


      Mr. Brickman, 3.0%


      Mr. Spinks, 0%


      Ms. Leite's employment with the Company commenced February 2016.
       

      Annual Incentive

      (Non-Equity)

      Annual Incentive Plan

      (AIP)

        Annual incentive bonusCash Award  Communicating and driving achievement of financial and strategic short-termannual objectives that are important to our sustained success and stock value.  FundedEarned based on growth in same store sales, adjusted EBITDAoperating income and working capital goals,strategic initiatives, with potential adjustment based on individual performance, as discussed on pages 33-37.performance. The AIP financial performance targetsobjectives for fiscal 2016FY19 are set forth in the table on page 35.“Annual Incentive—Performance Objectives” section of this CD&A.
       Each of the named executive officers earned between 50.0% and 114.9% of target based on achievement of performance goals. No discretionary adjustments to bonus payments were made based on individual performance. 

      Long-Term Incentives

      (Equity)

      2010 & 2019 Omnibus

      Incentive Plans

        Long-term incentive awards

      Stock options


      Performance Based Restricted Stock Units (PBRSUs)

      Options

      (Options)

        Creating a strong financial incentive for meeting or exceeding long-term financial goals, rewarding past performance, recognizing promotions, and encouraging an equity stake in the Corporation,Company, and aligning their interests with those of our stockholders. Also encouraging officer retention through multi-year vesting requirements.  Value for Options requires increases in Common Stock price.

      Performance-Based

      Restricted Stock Units

      (PBRSUs)

        Value for options requires sustained increases in common stock price over the life of the option (maximum ten-year period).


      PBRSUs are eligible to vest following conclusion of a 3-year performance period based on achievement of goals related to salesadjusted operating income growth and return on invested capital (ROIC) over such 3-yeara three-year period. In addition, value of PBRSUs at vesting is tied to company stock price.

      Time-Based

      Restricted Stock Awards

      (TBRSAs)

        Encouraging retention through multi-year vesting requirements.  Each of the named executive officers received stock options and PBRSUs (2/3rd 1/3rd value mix). Stock optionsTBRSAs vest ratably over a 3 yearthree-year period and PBRSUs vest based on achievement of objective, pre-established performance goals related to sales growth and ROIC, at the end ofwith continued employment providing a three year period.retention incentive.

      Table of Contents

      The CorporationCompany also provides the following elementscomponents of compensation:

      Component



      Element

      Form of Compensation

      Purpose

        Health and welfare plans

      Other Compensation

       Health and Welfare Benefits Eligibility to receive available health and other welfare benefits paid for, in whole or in part, by the Corporation,Company, including broad-based medical, dental, life and disability insurance.  Providing a competitive, broad-based employee benefits structure and promoting the good health of our executives.
       

      Retirement Plan

       

      Eligibility to participate in, and receive CorporationCompany contributions to, our 401(k) plan (available to all employees).

        

      Providing competitive retirement-planning benefits to attract and retain skilled management.

       Perquisites

      Executive Physical

       

      Reimbursement for an annual physical exam.

        Reimbursement for annual physical.

      Promoting the good health of our executives.

      New Hire Benefits

      Limited new hire benefits (including Company-paid COBRA and relocation expenses).

      Attracting new talent by providing a smooth transition to our Company.

        

      Change-in-Control Severance Protection

       Eligibility to receive cash severance (1.99 times base salary)salary and a5-year average AIP award payout) and post-termination health and welfare benefits (24 months) in connection with involuntary termination within two years after a change of control.  Providing a competitive compensation package for attraction and retention purposes before and after a change in control, as well as ensuring continuity of management in the event of any actual or threatened change in control of our Corporation.Company.

      40        LOGO     2019 Proxy Statement


      LOGO

      Tying Compensation to Performance

      Our executive compensation program closely links realized compensation to the achievement of financial objectives and increases in the Company’s stock price, with 61% of Mr. Brickman’s and 52% of our other NEOs’ FY19 target compensation being performance-based and contingent upon the achievement of financial or strategic performance objectives or changes in our stock price.

      LOGO

      We use four key performance metrics to measure results and determine annual incentive and PBRSU payouts:

      LOGO

      (1)

      Weightings vary based on business unit; SBH consolidated weightings shown

      Generate sustainable growth. The Compensation Committee believes these performance components — incorporated into the Company’s annual budget and long-term planning — represent the metrics that can be used by our stockholders to assess the Company’s value. Using these metrics consistently, together with overlapping performance periods for our PBRSUs, enables the Compensation Committee to evaluate the NEOs’ performance in generating sustainable growth.

                   Limited Sign-On Benefitswww.sallybeautyholdings.com          Sign-on cash bonus and certain perquisites:

      • Reimbursement of relocation expenses in limited situations.

      • Reimbursement of health insurance premiums only upon hire and prior to eligibility for coverage in Corporation's group health plans in limited situations.

      Provide a competitive sign-on package that attracts and retains skilled management.41 

      Base Salary


      LOGO

       

      Balance annual and long-term objectives. The Compensation Committee also believes that the overlap of the adjusted operating income performance metric between the AIP and PBRSUs focuses our NEOs on this measure. It highlights the importance of leading the Company to achieve both annual and long-term financial and strategic goals. It also reduces the risk that actions would be taken to sacrifice long-term growth to meet annual targets or vice versa.

      Flexibility to support long-term growth. The standards for determining performance against objectives established for these metrics are derived from the Company’s financial statements, which follow generally accepted accounting principles. The terms of our AIP and PBRSUs provide the Compensation Committee the ability to adjust results to exclude certain items, either positive or negative, that it considers extraordinary when determining performance againstpre-established financial goals. The Compensation Committee believes that retaining the ability to make adjustments encourages management’s willingness to take actions that may limit annual Company performance, yet support long-term growth. When evaluating our performance against goals for our FY19 AIP andFY17-19 PBRSU awards, the Compensation Committee did not make any adjustments.

      GRAPHICBase Salary

      The Compensation Committee determines the base salary forof each of our named executive officersNEO on an annual basis (unless market conditions or changes in responsibilities merit warrant amid-year changes) change) and targets base salaries at or near the 25th percentile to median of the companies in our peer group. The Compensation Committee uses its judgment to vary executive officer pay within the targeted range and from the targeted range based on various factors, such as an executive officer'sofficer’s experience, performance and responsibilities.

      In evaluating each executive officer'sthe NEOs’ performance, in his position with us, the Compensation Committee relies primarily on our Chief Executive Officer'sOfficer’s performance review of each executive officer other(other than himself.himself). The subjective factors considered by our Chief Executive Officer primarily consist of whether the executive officer met thetheir developmental and operational goals set for him or her and the financial performance within the executive officer'stheir area of responsibility.

      In September 2015,2018, the Compensation Committee reviewed market data provided by FW Cook on our peer companies and general industry to determine whether any significant changes to the base salaries for our executive officers were needed


      Table of Contents

      for fiscal 2016FY19 to align our executive team with the market. The Compensation Committee increased the base salary levels of the named executive officers (from 3% to 3.5%NEOs, with adjustments to reflect executive performance and to move executive salaries closer to the targeted competitive position)position as follows: Mr. Brickman, $950,000 to $978,500; Mr. Flaherty, $498,750 to $513,800; and Mr. Haltom, $400,000 to $414,000. Mr. Spinks' salary remained unchanged at $375,000. The Compensation Committee approved an annual base salary for Ms. Leite of $525,000.

       

                                                                                                                                             

      Name

        

      Start of FY19

      Base Salary

        % Increase (1) 

      End of FY19

      Base Salary

        

      Current NEOs

               
        

      Christian A. Brickman

        $1,000,000    2.0% $1,020,000
        

      Aaron E. Alt(2)

          $600,000  16.7%    $700,000
        

      Mark G. Spinks

          $450,000    2.0%    $459,000
        

      Scott C. Sherman

          $360,000    2.2%    $368,000
        

      John M. Henrich(3)

          $317,200  21.4%    $385,000
        

      Former NEO

               
        

      Chad L. Selvidge(4)

        $350,000    2.3%    $358,000

      (1)

      Base salary increases were effective October 28, 2018.

      (2)

      Mr. Alt had been promoted to Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and President, Sally Beauty Supply which warranted a higher base salary, based on the peer group data provided by FW Cook.

      (3)

      Mr. Henrich’s base salary at the start of FY19 was $265,200 plus a stipend of $1,000 per week ($52,000 annualized) for his role as Interim General Counsel and Secretary, for a total base salary of $317,200. On October 28, 2018, he received a 2.6% merit increase bringing his base salary to $272,200 plus his stipend of $1,000 per week ($52,000 annualized), for a total base salary of $324,200. On June 10, 2019, his base salary was increased to $385,000 with his promotion to Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary (with no stipend).

      (4)

      Mr. Selvidge separated from the Company on June 27, 2019.

      The Compensation Committee believes that the base salaries paid to our named executive officersNEOs during fiscal 2016FY19 were appropriate to facilitate our ability to retain and motivate such officers and were competitive with those offered by our peer companies. For the actual base salaries paid to our named executive officersNEOs during fiscal 2016,FY19, please see the "Summary“Summary Compensation Table" on page 45Table” of this Proxy Statement.

      42        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


      LOGO

      Annual Cash Incentive Bonus

              AIP.    For fiscal 2016, annual cash incentive bonuses for our named executive officers were made pursuant to the Sally Beauty Holdings,  Inc.Our Annual Incentive Plan which we refer(AIP) provides each NEO the opportunity to as the AIP, which operates as a sub-plan of the 2010 Omnibus Plan. The AIP is designed to function as a "plan within a plan" in order to preserve deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, while giving the Compensation Committee the flexibility to tailor awards to reflect financial, operational and individual achievementsreceive an annual incentive or cash award payout based on subjective as well as objective criteria. The "outer layer" component of the AIP is entirely objective. No bonuses will be payable under the AIP unless we achieve positive operating incometheir base salary for the fiscal year, as reflected in our audited consolidated financial statements. If we achieve this threshold financial goal for the year, our Chief Executive Officer's maximumtarget award is 1%percentage and achievement of such operating income and each other named executive officer's maximum award is 0.5% of such operating income, which we refer to as the "Section 162(m) maximum awards." As the "inner layer" component of the AIP, at the beginning of each year the Compensation Committee establishes other financial, operational and/or individual performance goals for each executive officer that will be used to determine actual bonus amounts that are below the officer's Section 162(m) maximum award. The Compensation Committee in effect uses "negative discretion" to reduce the Section 162(m) maximum awards, as it deems appropriate, based on our financial performance relative to these pre-determined goals and based on the Compensation Committee's more subjective evaluation of financial, operational and individual performance.objectives:

      FY19

      Base Salary

          X    

      Target

      Award Percentage

          X    

      Performance

      Objectives

      Payout %

          =    

      Award

      Payout

      Target Award

      Target Award

              Award Opportunities.    Consistent with the above approach, the Compensation Committee established certain performance criteria for each named executive officer which, if satisfied, would enable him to earn a target-level (below maximum) award under the AIP for fiscal 2016 (we refer to these "inner layer" performance criteria as the AIP criteria). These AIP criteria are factors used by the Compensation Committee in exercising its discretion to appropriately size the AIP bonuses, if any, to an amount that is below the Section 162(m) maximum award amount, as described above.

      Our Chief Executive Officer made recommendations to the Compensation Committee as to thefor each NEO’s target award percentage of each named executive officer's base salary (other than himself) to be used as his target-level award under the AIP,, based on job responsibilities and peer group data provided by FW Cook. The Compensation Committee made the determination as to the percentage ofdetermined the Chief Executive Officer's base salary to be used for his target-levelOfficer’s target award under the AIP,percentage, based on his job responsibilities and the peer group data provided by FW Cook. Mr. Brickman's bonusFor FY19, the Compensation Committee increased Messrs. Alt, Spinks, and Henrich’s target was 100% of his base salary.award percentages to better align them with market based on the peer group data provided by FW Cook. The bonus targetsCompensation Committee also considered Messrs. Alt and Henrich’s promotions, which warranted a higher target award percentage. The Compensation Committee approved the following FY19 target award percentages:

      Name

      FY18 Target

      Award Percentage (1)

      FY19 Target

      Award Percentage (1)

        

      Current NEOs

        
        

      Christian A. Brickman

      100%100%
        

      Aaron E. Alt

        60%  80%
        

      Mark G. Spinks

        60%  70%
        

      Scott C. Sherman

        60%  60%
        

      John M. Henrich

        40%  60%
        

      Former NEO

        
        

      Chad L. Selvidge

        60%  60%

      (1)

      Reflected as a percentage of base salary earned in the fiscal year.

      The target award opportunity for each NEO under the AIP in FY19 is as follows:

      Name

        

      FY19

      Base Salary (1)

        

      Target

      Award Percentage

       

      Target

      Award

        

      Current NEOs

               
        

      Christian A. Brickman

        $1,018,521  100% $1,018,521
        

      Aaron E. Alt

          $692,603    80%   $554,082
        

      Mark G. Spinks

          $458,334    70%   $320,834
        

      Scott C. Sherman

          $367,408    60%   $220,445
        

      John M. Henrich(2)

          $342,505    47%   $160,840
        

      Former NEO

               
        

      Chad L. Selvidge (3)

          $263,249    60%   $157,950

      (1)

      Base salary used for AIP target award calculation is prorated by the day and slightly differs from actual base salary paid.

      (2)

      Mr. Henrich’s target award was prorated with $223,313 of his FY19 base salary multiplied by a 40% target award percentage and $119,192 of his FY19 base salary multiplied by a 60% target award percentage, based on his promotion.

      (3)

      Mr. Selvidge’s target award was prorated based on his separation date.

      www.sallybeautyholdings.com        43


      LOGO

      Performance Objectives

      In establishing the performance objectives for FY19, the Compensation Committee determined that the primary emphasis should be on financial performance objectives. Accordingly, 80% of the NEOs’ AIP award payouts are based on achievement of financial performance goals and 20% on achievement of strategic initiatives, subject to potential adjustment based on individual performance as described below. For FY19, the AIP performance objectives consisted of the following components and weightings:

      Messrs. Brickman, Sherman, Henrich & Selvidge:      Mr. Alt:      Mr. Spinks:
      Component Weighting  Component Weighting  Component Weighting

      80%
      SBH

      Consolidated

       Same Store Sales Growth 40%  40%
      Sally USA & Canada
       Same Store Sales Growth 20%  60%
      BSG
       Same Store Sales Growth 30%
       Adjusted
      Operating
      Income
       20%  Adjusted
      Operating
      Income
       30%
       Adjusted
      Operating
      Income
       40%  

      40%
      SBH

      Consolidated

       Same Store
      Sales Growth
       20%  

      20%
      SBH

      Consolidated

       Adjusted
      Operating
      Income
       20%
       Adjusted
      Operating
      Income
       20% 
      20%
      Strategic
       

      Strategic

      Initiatives

       20%  20%
      Strategic
       Strategic
      Initiatives
       20%  20%
      Strategic
       

      Strategic

      Initiatives

       20%
      Total   100%  Total   100%  Total   100%

      For shared services officers (Messrs. Brickman, Sherman, Henrich and Selvidge), the financial performance objectives were based on consolidated (all the individual reporting units combined) achievement. For heads of a business unit (Messrs. Alt and Spinks), the financial performance objectives were based on both consolidated and business unit achievement. The percentage weighting of the various financial objectives represents the Compensation Committee’s determination regarding the relative importance of each metric to our other namedoverall financial performance. The strategic initiatives component focused on company-wide initiatives that applied to all executive officersofficers.

      In setting the financial performance objectives for fiscal 2016the AIP, the Compensation Committee reviewed our financial projections for FY19 with Mr. Brickman. For FY19, the AIP financial performance objectives were 60% of their respective base salaries (which bonus targets were unchanged from fiscal 2015).as follows:

      Same Store Sales Growth means sales from brick and mortar stores that have been open at least 14 months ande-commerce sales from only certain digital platforms within the organization.


      Table of Contents

      GRAPHIC

               SBH Consolidated        Sally USA & Canada        BSG
        Payout Scale     

      Performance

      Achieved

        

      Payout %

      (1)

           

      Performance

      Achieved

        

      Payout %

      (1)

           

      Performance

      Achieved

        

      Payout %

      (1)

      Maximum

         

      ³ 1.95%

        

      200%

         

      ³ 1.18%

        

      200%

         

      ³ 2.66%

        

      200%

      Target

         

         0.78%

        

       100%

         

         0.18%

        

       100%

         

         1.24%

        

       100%

      Threshold

         

         - 0.90%

        

         25%

         

         -1.10%

        

         25%

         

         - 0.75%

        

         25%

      Below Threshold

         

      <- 0.90%

        

           0%

         

      <-1.10%

        

           0%

         

      <- 0.75%

        

           0%

       

      (1)

      Payouts between performance levels is determined based on straight line interpolation.

      44        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


      LOGO

      Adjusted Operating Income means the operating income of the Company as reported in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, with such adjustment as the Compensation Committee may provide for prior to the commencement thereof (which adjustments may include effects of charges for restructurings, discontinued operations, extraordinary items, other unusual ornon-recurring items, and the cumulative effect of tax or accounting changes, each as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and identified in the financial statements, notes to the financial statements or management’s discussion and analysis).

           SBH Consolidated    Sally USA & Canada      BSG  
        Payout Scale     

      Adjusted

      Operating

      Income

      (Millions)

       

      Performance

      Achieved

       

      Payout %

      (1)

       

        

        

      Adjusted

      Operating

      Income

      (Millions)

       

      Performance

      Achieved

       

      Payout %

      (1)

       

        

        

      Adjusted

      Operating

      Income

      (Millions)

       

      Performance

      Achieved

       

      Payout %

      (1)

      Maximum

        

      ³$515.0

       

      ³110.00%

       

      200%

        

      ³$368.7

       

      ³110.00%

       

      200%

        

      ³$279.2

       

      ³110.00%

       

      200%

      Target

        

        $468.1

       

        100.00%

       

      100%

        

        $335.2

       

        100.00%

       

      100%

        

        $253.8

       

        100.00%

       

      100%

      Threshold

        

        $425.9

       

          90.98%

       

        25%

        

        $301.7

       

          90.00%

       

        25%

        

        $233.0

       

          91.81%

       

        20%

      Below Threshold

        

      <$425.9

       

        <90.98%

       

          0%

        

      <$301.7

       

        <90.00%

       

          0%

        

      <$233.0

       

        <91.81%

       

          0%

      (1)

      Payouts between performance levels is determined based on straight line interpolation.

      Strategic Initiatives are company-wide initiatives applied to all officers set at the beginning of FY19 by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board of Directors. These strategic initiatives focused on product launches, improving retail fundamentals and advancing digital commerce capabilities.

        Performance Achieved

      Payout %

      Exceeds

      101-150%

      Target

             100%

      Not Fully Achieved

            0-99%

      The AIP is designed so that if we achieve the AIP financial performance targets and strategic initiatives (as discussed below)above), the executiveeach NEO is eligible to earn 100% of histheir target bonus award. Financial performancePerformance at below- targetbelow-target levels (subject to a threshold of 96.1% of target performance for each metric except for working capital) would result in awards as low as 0% of the target award, subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee to make adjustmentsadjust awards as described below. If we exceed the AIP financial performance targets, each named executive officerNEO is eligible to earn an AIP bonusaward in an amount up to 200% of his target award, not to exceed the designated individual award limit. We refer to these higher amounts as the "AIP maximum awards," as distinguished from the Section 162(m) maximum awards.

              AIP Financial Performance Criteria.    In establishing the performance objectives for fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee determined that the primary emphasis should be on financial performance objectives. Accordingly, in order for an executive to receive 100% of his AIP target bonus, the target level of financial performance must be achieved, subject to a potential adjustment based on individual performance, as described below.

              For fiscal 2016, the AIP financial criteria consisted of the following three performance metrics, which were measured with reference to our annual operating plan. For shared services officers (Messrs. Brickman, Flaherty, and Haltom), these metrics were expressed on the consolidated level as made up by individual reporting units. For heads of a business unit (Ms. Leite and Mr. Spinks), these metrics were expressed as that segment's portion of our annual operating plan. The percentage weighting of the various financial metrics represents the Compensation Committee's determination regarding the relative importance of each metric to our overall financial performance.


      Table of Contents

              In setting the financial performance targets for the AIP, the Compensation Committee reviewed our financial projections for fiscal 2016 with Mr. Brickman and Mr. Flaherty. For fiscal 2016, the AIP financial performance targets were as follows:


      Sales
      Adjusted EBITDA
      Working Capital
      Messrs. Brickman,
          Flaherty and Haltom
      $3.963 billion consolidated
      $1.977 billion of Sally North America
      $1.531 billion of BSG North America
      $430.9 million of Sally International
      $23.5 million of BSG International
      (weighted 30%)
      $639.1 million consolidated
      $461.1 million of Sally North America
      $274.6 million of BSG North America
      $23.8 million of Sally International
      $2.2 million of BSG International
      (weighted 50%)
      17.22% of consolidated
      14.37% of Sally North America
      18.08% of BSG North America
      25.87% of Sally International
      30.13% of BSG International
      (weighted 20%)
      Mr. Spinks$1.555 billion of BSG
      $1.428 billion BSG USA
      $137 million BSG Canada
      $23.5 million BSG International
      (weighted 30%)
      $276.8 million of BSG
      $257.7 million BSG USA
      $22.4 million BSG Canada
      $2.2 million BSG International
      (weighted 50%)
      17.94% of BSG USA
      19.93% of BSG Canada
      30.13% of BSG International
      (weighted 20%)
      Ms. Leite$1.892 billion of Sally USA and Sally Canada
      (weighted 30%)
      $449.2 million of Sally USA and Sally Canada
      (weighted 50%)
      14.27% of Sally USA and Sally Canada
      (weighted 20%)

              As noted above, if we achieve target-level financial performance, the executives are eligible to earn 100%components of their target AIP bonus awards. Financial performance at below-target levels (subject to a threshold of 96.1% of target performance for each metric other than working capital, which is set at a low threshold of prior year's actual performance) would result in awards as low as approximately 0%award and 150% of the target award, except that, as discussed below, the Compensation Committee has discretion to reduce or increase the dollar value of an individual officer's AIP award based upon a subjective assessment of the individual's performance. The named executive officers were eligible to earn bonuses in excess of the target awards (up to the AIP maximum awards stated above) to the extent that performance against the financial goals exceeded target performance. AIP maximum awards could be earned if:

        we, or the applicable business unit, had achieved 100.1% or greater of the target amount of sales for fiscal 2016,

        we, or the applicable business unit, had achieved 100.1% or greater of the target amount of adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2016, and

        we, or the applicable business unit, achieved a ratio of working capital to sales at least one basis point below target.

              When performance for a given financial metric exceeds target, the payout between target and maximum award opportunity for that metric is determined by straight-line interpolation. For example, based on the following sales chart, sales performance of 102.38% of target would translate into a payout percentage of 159.50%. If the sales component is weighted at 30% of the bonus opportunity, the weighted payout for that metric would equate to 47.85% of the total target bonus opportunity for that participant. Based on the following EBITDA chart, EBITDA performance of 104.58% of target would translate into a payout percentage of 157.25%. If the EBITDA component is weighted at 50% of


      Table of Contentsstrategic initiatives component.

      the bonus opportunity, the weighted payout for that metric would equate to 78.63% of the total target bonus opportunity for that participant.

       
      Sales Target
       
      Objective
       Payout Percentage
       

      104% & Above

       200%
       

      103%

       175%
       

      102%

       150%
       

      101%

       125%
       

      100%

       100%
       

      99%

       75%
       

      98%

       50%
       

      97%

       25%
       

      96% & Below

       0%
       


       
      EBITDA Target
       
      Objective
       Payout Percentage
       

      108%

       200%
       

      106%

       175%
       

      104%

       150%
       

      102%

       125%
       

      100%

       100%
       

      99%

       75%
       

      98%

       50%
       

      97%

       25%
       

      96% & Below

       0%
       

              Individual Performance.    In order toTo provide flexibility to recognize overall achievements in key focus areas and operational performance, which can change throughout the year based on unanticipated contingencies, the Compensation Committee does not list specificspecify individual performance objectives for individual officers under the AIP. Instead, the Compensation Committee has the abilitymaintains discretion to use its qualitative judgment to reduce or increase the dollar value of an individual officer'sofficer’s AIP award (by up to 50 percentage points below or above the percentage of the target award resulting from application of the financial performance formulas) based upon a subjective assessment of the individual'sindividual’s performance, but the adjusted payout cannot exceed the Section 162(m) maximum award for such individual.

              Determination of Fiscal 2016 Awards.    In its September and November 2016 meetings, the Compensation Committee reviewed the 2016 fiscal year business results and determined whether and to what extent the AIP criteria were met. During this review, the Compensation Committee met with Mr. Brickman to discuss his performance reviews of the other named executive officers and with the Chairman of the Board to discuss the Board's review of Mr. Brickman (without Mr. Brickman being present). The Compensation Committee did not adjust AIP payoutsexercise any such discretion with respect to FY19.

      www.sallybeautyholdings.com        45


      LOGO

      Award Payout

      The final results for individualthe FY19 performance for any of the named executive officers for fiscal 2016.


      Table of Contents

              The amounts by which the financial performance targetsobjectives (financial and strategic) under the AIP were achieved for each metric, and the resulting payout factors, are illustratedshown in the following table. The amounts by which the financial performance targets under the AIP were achieved for each metric, and the resulting payout factors, are illustrated in the following table.table:

        Sales  Adjusted EBITDA  Working Capital  Aggregate Payout
       
       
       Weighted
      Achievement
      %

       Weighted
      Payout
      %

       Weighted
      Achievement
      %

       Weighted
      Payout
      %

       Weighted
      Achievement
      %

       Weighted
      Payout
      %

       As % of
      Target
      Bonus

       As % of
      Base
      Salary

       

      Mr. Brickman

        100.08% 30.11% 98.26% 20.00% 95.56% 2.62% 52.73% 53%

      Mr. Flaherty

        100.08% 30.11% 98.26% 20.00% 95.56% 2.62% 52.73% 32%

      Mr. Haltom

        100.08% 30.11% 98.26% 20.00% 95.56% 2.62% 52.73% 32%

      Mr. Spinks

        102.24% 45.65% 103.04% 67.21% 94.33% 2.00% 114.86% 69%

      Ms. Leite(1)(2)

        98.64% 19.50% 96.54% 6.25% 95.64% 0.00% 25.75% 15%
      (1)
      Table above reflects Ms. Leite's actual performance. Per her offer letter, she will receive a guaranteed minimum payout of 50% of her AIP payout assuming target performance prorated by her start date through the end of the fiscal year.

      (2)
      Table above reflects a prorated base salary to determine Ms. Leite's % of base salary.

       

        

       

       SBH Consolidated Business Unit (Sally USA & Canada or BSG)  Strategic Initiatives 

      Performance

      Objectives

      Payout %

         Same Store
      Sales Growth
        Adjusted
      Operating Income
       Same Store
      Sales Growth
        Adjusted
      Operating Income
       

      Name

       

      Performance

      Achieved

        

      Weighted

      Payout

        

      Performance

      Achieved

       

      Weighted

      Payout

       

      Performance

      Achieved

        

      Weighted

      Payout

        

      Performance

      Achieved

        

      Weighted

      Payout

        

      Performance

      Achieved

       

      Weighted

      Payout

                

      Current NEOs

                                       
        

      Mr. Brickman

       

       

      39.74%

       

       

       

      31.61%

       

       

      97.88%

       

      32.95%

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      80.00%

       

      16.00%

       

        80.56%

        

      Mr. Alt

       

       

      39.74%

       

       

       

      15.80%

       

       

      97.88%

       

      16.47%

       

       

      455.56%

       

       

       

      32.80%

       

       

       

      103.63%

       

       

       

      27.26%

       

       

      80.00%

       

      16.00%

       

      108.33%

        

      Mr. Spinks

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      97.88%

       

      16.47%

       

       

        12.90%

       

       

       

      17.79%

       

       

       

        94.39%

       

       

       

      13.56%

       

       

      80.00%

       

      16.00%

       

        63.82%

        

      Mr. Sherman

       

       

      39.74%

       

       

       

      31.61%

       

       

      97.88%

       

      32.95%

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      80.00%

       

      16.00%

       

        80.56%

        

      Mr. Henrich(1)

       

       

      39.74%

       

       

       

      31.61%

       

       

      97.88%

       

      32.95%

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      80.00%

       

      16.00%

       

        80.82%

                

      Former NEO

                                     
        

      Mr. Selvidge

       

       

      39.74%

       

       

       

      31.61%

       

       

      97.88%

       

      32.95%

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      80.00%

       

      16.00%

       

        80.56%

      (1)

      Mr. Henrich’s performance objectives payout percentage was different for the time he was the Interim General Counsel and Secretary (excluded strategic initiatives).

      The table below shows the payout opportunitiestarget awards and actualthe award payouts under the AIP for the named executive officersNEOs for fiscal 2016:FY19:

       
      AIP Target as
      a % of Salary

      AIP Target
      Award ($)

      FY16 Actual AIP
      Award ($)

      AIP Actual Award
      as a % of Salary

      Mr. Brickman

      100%977,176515,26553%

      Mr. Flaherty

      60%307,861162,33532%

      Mr. Haltom

      60%248,010130,77632%

      Mr. Spinks

      60%225,000258,43569%

      Ms. Leite(1)(2)

      60%209,139104,56430%
      (1)
      Table above reflects Ms. Leite's guaranteed minimum bonus payout, as described above.

      (2)
      Table above reflects a prorated base salary to determine Ms. Leite's % of salary.

        Name

        Target

        Award

        Performance

        Objectives

        Payout %

        Award Payout
          

        Current NEOs

           
          

        Mr. Brickman

        $1,018,521

          80.56%

        $820,520

          

        Mr. Alt

          $554,082

        108.33%

        $600,237

          

        Mr. Spinks

          $320,834

          63.82%

        $204,756

          

        Mr. Sherman

          $220,445

          80.56%

        $177,590

          

        Mr. Henrich(1)

          $160,840

          80.82%

        $129,993

          

        Former NEO

           
          

        Mr. Selvidge(1)

          $157,950

          80.56%

        $127,244

        (1)

        Messrs. Henrich and Selvidge’s awards were prorated. See “Annual Incentive—Target Award” section in this CD&A and the table above for more details.

        Equity-Based Long-Term Incentive CompensationIncentives

              Historically, our named executive officers received their regular annual long-term incentive award in the form of stock options, with restricted stock awards reserved for limited purposes. In October 2015, the Compensation Committee approved a new long-term incentive program for fiscal 2016, pursuant to which employees at the Vice President level and above received a significant portion (33%) of their fiscal 2016 equity-based compensation in the form of PBRSUs and the remaining portion in the form of time-based stock options (67%).

        The PBRSUs are eligible to vest following the conclusion of a three-year performance period based on the level of achievement of goals related to sales growth (weighted at 40%) and return on invested capital (ROIC) (weighted at 60%), over such three-year period. Each of these performance metrics is an indicator of our growth and profitability, thereby aligning the interests of senior management with the long-term interests of our shareholders. The Compensation Committee established threshold, target and maximum performance levels for both sales growth

      Table of Contents

          and ROIC, where achievement at the threshold, target and maximum performance level results in 50%, 100% and 200%, respectively, of the PBRSUs becoming vested.

        Stock options create a strong financial incentive for meeting or exceeding our long-term financial goals and increasing stockholder return because the benefits of such awards are dependent on the appreciation of the price of our Common Stock. In addition, the options vest ratably over a three-year period, requiring our executives to remain employed for a significant period in order to realize any value for their options.

              Grant Practices for Equity-Based Awards.    The Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s policy is to grant long-term incentive or equity awards on the same day it approves the grant. Options have an exercise price equal to the closing price of our Common Stock on the date of grant. Other than specialone-time grants, such as at the time of a new hire or promotion, the Compensation Committee intends to grant equity awards to its executive officers once a year, and such grants willare generally be made at the same time that the Compensation Committee approves base salary increases and the annual bonus award targets under the annual bonus planAIP target awards for the fiscal year. These actions will generally occur within the first month of the fiscal year. Equity grants are currently made under the 2010 Omnibus Plan.

      Our Vice President of Compensation, Benefits and Benefits recommends toHRIS provides our Chief Executive Officer the numberwith a listing of options or otheremployees eligible for equity awards to be granted to certain key employees based on consideration of each individual's rate of base salary and the dollar value of the proposed award as a percentage of base salary and market value.awards. Our Chief Executive Officer then makes a grant recommendation to the Compensation Committee for each of the proposed grantees, including the named executive officersNEOs other than himself, to the Compensation Committee based on consideration of the value of the grants that the individualemployee received in prior years, the competitive market data provided by FW Cook and his views as to the individual'semployee’s expected future contribution to our business results. The Chairman of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors recommends to the Compensation Committee the Chief Executive Officer'sOfficer’s proposed equity grant based on his review of competitive market data provided by FW Cook. The Compensation Committee is ultimately responsible for determining the number of options or shares to be awarded and for approving each grant. In making this determination, the Compensation Committee considers the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer, the long-term incentive opportunity market data provided by FW Cook, and the competitive data provided by FW Cook regarding aggregate share usage and costs associated with equity grants.

              Fiscal 2016 Equity Awards.    Consistent with its equity grant policy, in October 2015, the Compensation Committee granted stock options and PBRSUs to each of our named executive officers. Ms. Leite joined our company in February 2016 and, therefore, did not receive a long-term incentive award in October 2015. In connection with her commencement of employment, Ms. Leite received an award of non-qualified stock options with a grant date value of approximately $312,500 and an award of restricted stock with a grant date value of approximately $312,500, which awards vest ratably over three years subject to Ms. Leite's continued employment with the Company.


      46        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement

      Table of Contents


      GRAPHICLOGO

       

      The Compensation Committee sets an aggregate long-term incentive budget to determine the total amount of equity awards that may be awarded in any fiscal year. The Compensation Committee determines the budget after discussions with FW Cook and management and a review of peer group practices, evaluation of prior year performance and the projected impact to our net income. Based upon input received from FW Cook, the long-term incentive award opportunities provided to our executive officers are conservative relative to market practice.

      FY19 Equity Awards

      Consistent with its equity grant policy, the Compensation Committee believes thatgranted options and TBRSAs in November 2018 to each of our executive officers. The Compensation Committee delayed the termsgrant of theFY19-21 PBRSUs to January 2019 to allow management additional time to assess key assumptions around business performance, investments in support of continued transformation and conditionsuses of cash for theFY19-21 period, each of which informed the 2016 equity awards, as well asperformance goals for the size of the grants, were within the range of peer group practice.

      FY19-21 PBRSUs. For more information regarding the equity-basedequity awards granted to our named executive officersNEOs during fiscal 2016,FY19, please see the "GrantsGrants of Plan-Based Awards For Fiscal 2016" table on page 47 of this Proxy Statement. As a condition of the grant, grantees, including our NEOs, have agreed that, for one year following termination of employment, they will not solicit our employees or customers. The grant value of the NEOs’ FY19 equity awards are reflected in the following table:

      Name

      FY19

      Equity Award

      Grant Value

      Current NEOs

      Christian A. Brickman

      $4,000,000

      Aaron E. Alt

         $900,000

      Mark G. Spinks

         $600,000

      Scott C. Sherman

         $450,000

      John M. Henrich

         $200,000

      Former NEO

      Chad L. Selvidge(1)

         $400,000

      (1)

      Mr. Selvidge forfeited his unvested outstanding equity awards in connection with his separation.

      Options comprised 34% of the equity award value. Options vestone-third per year, have aten-year term, and have an exercise price equal to the closing price per share of our Common Stock on the date of grant.

      PBRSUs comprised 33% of the equity award value. PBRSUs are eligible to vest based on achievement of goals related to consolidated adjusted operating income (OI) growth and return on invested capital (ROIC) over a three-year period.

      Adjusted Operating Income Growth means the “compounded annual growth rate” over the performance period of the Company’s adjusted consolidated operating income, represented as a percentage, and measured as follows:

                              Adjusted  Operating Income Growth  =  

      (
      Adjusted Operating Income
      during fiscal year ending September 30, 2021
      )(13 )

       1

      Adjusted Operating Incomeduring fiscal year ending September 30, 2018

      Return on Invested Capital means net income plusafter-tax interest expense divided by monthly invested capital over the three-year performance period.

      PBRSUs

      Granted

        è  

      Adjusted OI Growth (60%)

        +  

      ROIC (40%)

        =  

      Total Payout

       Payout Scale   Payout %  

      (1)

       Payout Scale   Payout %  

      (1)

       Payout Scale   Payout %  

      (1)

       

      Maximum

       

      200%

       

      Maximum

       

      200%

       

      Maximum

       

      200%

       

      Target

       

      100%

       

      Target

       

      100%

       

      Target

       

      100%

       

      Threshold

       

        50%

       

      Threshold

       

        50%

       

      Threshold

       

        50%

       

      Below Threshold

       

          0%

       

      Below Threshold

       

          0%

       

      Below Threshold

       

          0%

      (1)

      Payouts between performance levels will be determined based on straight line interpolation.

      TBRSAs comprised 33% of the equity award value. TBRSAs vest ratably over a three-year period.

      www.sallybeautyholdings.com        47


      LOGO

      GRAPHICDetermination ofFY17-19 PBRSUs

      Following the completion of the performance period, the Compensation Committee determined that theFY17-19 PBRSUs granted in November 2016 were not earned because the Company did not achieve threshold performance levels for either the sales growth metric (40%) or the ROIC metric (60%). Per the terms of the award, theFY17-19 PBRSUs were cancelled without payout.

      Other Compensation

      Consistent with our philosophy of emphasizing performance-based pay, our executive compensation program provides limited executive benefits and perquisites. Our named executive officersNEOs are eligible to participate in the benefit plans generally available to all of our U.S. employees, which include health, dental, vision, life insurance, and disability plans. In addition, our named executive officersNEOs (along with our other U.S. employees) are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan, which represents the only retirement plan that we provide to our named executive officers.NEOs. Under the 401(k) plan, our employees may contribute on(on apre-tax basis, basis) up to 50% of eligible compensation, subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. WeAfter a year of service, we match each employee'semployee’s contribution including(including our named executive officers,NEOs) at a rate of 100% on the first 4% of the employee'semployee’s eligible compensation. Employees are immediately vested in the matching contributions made by us. Our 401(k) planNEOs are also has a profit sharing component, which is 100% funded by useligible for reimbursement of an annual physical exam. In addition, we may offer Company-paid COBRA and is determined annually by the Compensation Committee. Employees are vested in our profit sharing contributions after 3 full years of employment. For fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee reviewed the contributions of our employees to our financial performance and determined that a company contribution of approximately .75% of eligible compensation was an appropriate profit-sharing contribution.

              Consistent with our philosophy of emphasizing performance-based pay, ourrelocation expenses for new executive compensation program provides limited benefits and perquisites. All perquisites for executive officers must be approved by the Compensation Committee.officers.

      The Compensation Committee believes that offering the above-described benefits and perquisites to our named executive officersNEOs is consistent with the terms and benefits offered by other similarly-situated public companies and enhances our ability to retain our named executive officers.NEOs. Given the fact that these items represent a relatively insignificant portion of our named executive officers'NEOs’ total compensation, the availability of such items does not materially influence the decisions made by the Compensation Committee with respect to the other elements of the total compensation payable to our named executive officers.NEOs.


      Table of ContentsChange-in-Control Severance Protection

      ManyPost-Termination Benefitschange-in-control

              Change-in-Control Agreements.    Many change-in-control transactions result in significant organizational changes, particularly at the senior executive level. In order toTo encourage our senior executive officers to remain employed with the CorporationCompany during an important time when their prospects for continued employment can be uncertain, we have entered into are parties tochange-in-control severance agreements only with each of our senior executive officers, Messrs. Brickman, Flaherty, Haltom, Spinks and Ms. Leite,NEOs, which provide payments and benefits in the event of the executive'sexecutive’s termination of employment by the CorporationCompany without cause or by the executive for "good reason"“good reason” within two years following a change in control. Because a termination by the executive for good reason is effectively a "constructive termination"“constructive termination” by the CorporationCompany without cause, we believe it is appropriate to provide severance benefits in these circumstances. The Compensation Committee has determined that ourchange-in-control agreements were generally consistent with those in place at similarly-situated public companies, were designed to keep our executives focused on their work responsibilities during the uncertainty that accompanies a potentialchange-in-control, and (consistent with the recommendation of our Chief Executive Officer) were necessary to retain and recruit our senior executives. The Compensation Committee also deemed it important from a retention perspective to treat all of the named executive officersNEOs similarly with respect to theirchange-in-control arrangements.

              Treatment of Equity Awards upon Change in Control.Under the terms of our Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 20072010 and 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "2007 Omnibus Plan") and our 2010 Omnibus Plan,Plans, stock optionoptions and restricted stock awards have "double trigger" “double trigger”change-in-control vesting if the awards are assumed by the surviving company and equitably converted to awards for publicly traded stock in connection with such transaction. This means that the awards would vest upon the holder'sholder’s involuntary separation from service within two years following the change in control, or such other period specified by the Compensation Committee. If the awards are not assumed by the surviving company and equitably converted, they would vest upon the change in control. In addition, upon a change in control, PBRSUs will be cancelled in exchange for an amount equal to the change in control price multiplied by the target number of PBRSUs granted. This vesting approach aids in our ability to retain key executives during the critical time leading up to and following a change in control.

      48        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


      LOGO

      Additional Compensation Policies

      Compensation Recoupment Policy

      The CorporationCompany has adopted a compensation recoupment policy that complies with and goes beyond the parameters described in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("(“Dodd-Frank Act"Act”). Consistent with the Dodd-Frank Act, in the event thatif we are required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements under the U.S. securities laws, we will seek to recover from any current or former executive officer incentive-based compensation (including equity compensation) received during the three-year period preceding the date on which the accounting restatement was required to be made. The amount to be recovered is the excess of the amount paid calculated by reference to the erroneous data, over the amount that would have been paid to the executive officer calculated using the corrected accounting statement data. This compensation recovery would be applied regardless of whether the executive officer engaged in misconduct or otherwise caused or contributed to the requirement for the restatement.

      In addition to the above-described recoupment specified by the Dodd-Frank Act, our policy also requires the Corporation,Company, to the extent permitted by governing law, to seek reimbursement ofnon-equity incentive compensation paid to any current or former employee, after January 1, 2011, where: A) (i) the payment was predicated upon the achievement of specified financial results; (ii) such financial results were subsequently the subject of a restatement or other material adjustment, (iii) in the Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s view the person engaged in misconduct that caused or contributed to the need for the restatement or material adjustment, and (iv) a lower payment would have been made to the person based upon the correct financial results; or B) such employee commits an act of


      Table of Contents

      embezzlement, fraud or theft with respect to the property of the Corporation.Company. In each such instance, the CorporationCompany will seek to recover the person'sperson’s entirenon-equity incentive compensation payment (not just the excess amount earned based on erroneous data) paid during the12-month period preceding the Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s determination that the person engaged in misconduct.

      In FY19, the Company amended our policy to provide that, in addition to the above-described recoupment, in the event that the Compensation Committee determines that any current or former employee engages in misconduct (as defined in the policy), then the Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, require (i) cancellation or forfeiture of such current or former employee’s unvested equity awards granted on or after September 18, 2019, and/or (ii) such current or former employee to reimburse the Company for their most recently receivedStocknon-equity incentive compensation.

      Equity Ownership Guidelines and Retention GuidelinesRequirement

      Consistent with our commitment to aligning the interests of our executives with stockholders, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board of Directors has adopted stockequity ownership guidelines which apply to our officers at the Vice President level and above. Pursuant to these guidelines, which were amended in July 2016, officers are encouraged to own shares of our Common Stock generally equal in value to a multiple of their annual base salary (as in effect on December 1st1st of each year) depending on such executive'sexecutive’s level in the Corporation. The July 2016 amendment revised the stock ownership guidelines in order to account for the change in our long-term incentive program approved in October 2015, which provides that employees at the Vice President level and above receive a significant portion (33%) of their equity-based compensation in the form of PBRSUs.Company.

      The amended guidelines provide that shares owned outright by the officer or indirectly (e.g., owned or held in trust by an immediate family member), vested but unexercised stock options, shares the receipt of which has been deferred, as well as shares held in company sponsored benefit or retirement plans, count towards the grantee'sgrantee’s stock ownership totals, with each option counting as one share of stock owned. The previous guidelines allowed for restricted stock units to count towards the total.

      Unvested stock options, restricted shares (stock for which restrictions have not lapsed), restricted stock units which have not been settled, as well as unearned PBRSUs, do not count as stock owned under the guidelines. The previous guidelines did not specify that restricted stock units which have not been settled, as well as unearned PBRSUs, do not count towards the total. The officer stockequity ownership guidelines, as applicable to the named executive officers,NEOs, are as follows:

      Position

      Ownership Guideline

          (Multiple of Base Salary)    

      Chief Executive Officer

      5x

      Presidents and Senior Vice Presidents

      3x

      Group Vice Presidents and Vice Presidents

      1x

                   Chief Executive OfficerFive times annual base salarywww.sallybeautyholdings.com  
              Presidents and Senior Vice PresidentsThree times annual base salary
      Group Vice Presidents and Vice PresidentsOne time annual base salary49 


      LOGO

       

      Until such time as the officer reaches his or hertheir equity ownership guideline, the officer will be required to retain that percentage of the shares of Common Stock received upon vesting of restricted stock, settlement of restricted stock units and exercise of stock options (net of any shares utilized to pay for the exercise price of the option and/or tax withholding for the option, restricted stock or restricted stock units, as applicable) as set forth below:

      Retention Requirement

      Chief Executive OfficerPosition

      Retention

          Requirement    

         
      100%

      Chief Executive Officer

      100%

      Presidents and Senior Vice Presidents

            50%50%

      Group Vice Presidents and Vice Presidents

            50%50%

      Because officers must retain a percentage of shares resulting from any exercise of stock options, settlement of restricted stock units or the vesting of restricted stock until they achieve the specified guidelines, there is no minimum time period required to achieve the equity ownership guidelines set forth above. As of December 1, 2016,September 30, 2019, all of our executive officers were in compliance with our equity ownership guidelines.retention requirements.

      The Compensation Committee may in the future consider an executive'sexecutive’s achievement of the guideline stockequity ownership targetsguidelines in its award of further equity grants.


      TableUse of ContentsPre-Approved Trading Plans

              Beginning in fiscal year 2013, we instituted stock ownership and retention guidelines for our independent directors, as further described on page 22 of this Proxy Statement.

      Use of Pre-Approved Trading Plans

      We permit our executive officers and Directors to enter intopre-approved trading plans established according toRule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,SEC rules, with an independent broker-dealer to enable them to either a) purchase securities; or b) to recognize the value of their compensation and diversify their holdings of our securities during periods in which they might otherwise not be able to buy or sell our stock because important information about us had not been publicly released. These plans include specific instructions for the broker to exercise options or purchase or sell stock on behalf of the plan participant if our stock price reaches a specified level or certain events occur. The plan participant no longer controls the decision to purchase, exercise or sell the securities in the plan. Generally, when our executive officers trade under these plans they are publicly disclosed in Section 16 filings with the SEC. Three of our named executive officers (Messrs. Flaherty, Spinks and Haltom) and two of our Directors (Mr. Miller and Mr. Eisenberg) had Rule 10b5-1 sale plans in place during fiscal 2016.

      Policy Against Margin Trading, Pledging or Hedging Company Stock

      Certain forms of margin trading, pledging, hedging or monetization transactions, such aszero-cost collars and forward sale contracts, allow a director, officer or other employee to lock in much of the value of his or hertheir stock holdings, often in exchange for all or part of the potential for upside appreciation in the stock. These transactions allow the person to continue to own the covered securities but without the full risks and rewards of ownership. When that occurs, he or she may no longer have the same objectives as the Corporation'sCompany’s other stockholders. Therefore, pursuant to our published insider trading policy, our directors, officers and other employees are prohibited from engaging in any such transactions. Our insider trading policy also prohibits transactions in puts, calls or other derivative securities, on an exchange or in any other organized market.

      DeductibilityCOMPENSATIONDECISION-MAKING PROCESS

      Role of Compensation Committee

              Section 162(m)The Compensation Committee reviews each component of our executive compensation program, and the methods for determining the types and amounts of compensation, to assure that they help us meet our compensation philosophy and objectives. The Compensation Committee receives input from its independent compensation consultant as well as from members of management, as discussed below.

      The Chair of our Compensation Committee has significant experience in the management of professionals and has served both as chair and as a member of the Internal Revenue Code limitscompensation committees of other publicly-traded companies, and all of our Compensation Committee members have significant experience with regard to the deductibilityoversight of executive compensation practices of large publicly-traded companies. The Board believes that this experience provides the members of our Compensation Committee with a solid frame of reference within which to evaluate our executive compensation programs and practices.

      50        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


      LOGO

      Role of Independent Compensation Consultant

      The Compensation Committee retained the services of an independent consultant, FW Cook, to assist in its annual review of our executive compensation program and biennial review of ournon-employee director compensation program. As part of this engagement, FW Cook assisted the Compensation Committee in the design of our current programs and continues to advise the Compensation Committee on our programs. The Compensation Committee has directly engaged FW Cook to assist with these same services for federal income tax purposesFY19, based on FW Cook’s experience, expertise and familiarity with the Company. FW Cook does not provide any services to our management, and does not provide any service to us, other than with respect to its role as the Compensation Committee’s executive compensation consultant.

      The Compensation Committee determined that the work of FW Cook did not raise any conflicts of interest in FY19. In making this assessment, the Compensation Committee considered the independence factors enumerated inRule 10C-1(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the NYSE listing standards, including the fact that FW Cook does not provide any other services to the Company, the level of fees received from the Company as a percentage of FW Cook’s total revenue, policies and procedures employed by FW Cook to prevent conflicts of interest, and whether the individual FW Cook advisers to the Compensation Committee own any stock of the Company or have any business or personal relationships with members of the Compensation Committee or our executive officers.

      Role of Management

      The Compensation Committee also considers the views and insights of our management, including our executive officers, in making compensation decisions. Our Chief Executive Officer recommends to the Compensation Committee the base pay levels and individual compensation targets for each executive officer (other than himself) based on each executive’s experience, as well as our Chief Executive Officer’s view as to the strategic importance of that executive’s role, knowledge and performance. Our Chief Executive Officer’s unique insight into our business andday-to-day interaction with our senior executives provides a valuable resource to the Compensation Committee with respect to our executive compensation programs. In addition, the Compensation Committee relied on recommendations made by our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer in selecting the performance metrics and targets for FY19 incentive awards.

      Our Chief Executive Officer as well as other members of management generally attend Compensation Committee meetings to provide input on executive contributions, but no member of management participates in discussions with the Compensation Committee concerning their own compensation. The Compensation Committee also works closely with our internal legal, human resources, and finance personnel in establishing and monitoring our compensation programs. Our Chief Financial Officer provides the Compensation Committee with input on our financial performance and operational issues, and our General Counsel provides input to the Compensation Committee regarding compliance with the laws, regulations and best practices applicable to executive compensation.

      Market Data/Benchmarking

      FW Cook assisted the Compensation Committee in benchmarking our compensation arrangements and aggregate equity compensation practices against public companies similar in size and scope to our company. FW Cook obtained proxy data from the peer companies described below, as well as comparative compensation surveys of general industry companies.

      www.sallybeautyholdings.com        51


      LOGO

      The following 16 specialty retail companies comprised our peer group for FY19 and was used to set FY19 compensation for our NEOs, which we refer to as our “peer companies” or “peer group”:

      Abercrombie & Fitch

      Dick’s Sporting GoodsThe Michaels Companies
      American Eagle OutfittersFoot LockerTractor Supply
      CaleresParty CityUlta Beauty
      Carter’sSignet JewelersUrban Outfitters
      Chico’s FASTailored BrandsWilliams-Sonoma
      Designer Brands (Formerly DSW)

      The Compensation Committee selected the companies in the peer group, after reviewing data on retail companies (including financial metrics,line-of-business, stock performance and employee count for each respective company) and considering several criteria, including the comparability of specialty retailers and the volatility and maturity of potential peers. In terms of size, our revenues and our market capitalization approximated the median of these peer companies. The peer group differs from our peer group for FY18. The Compensation Committee approved the addition of the following companies based on such companies being similar to us with respect to revenue, market capitalization and international strategy, as well as our view that such companies are competitors for executive talent: American Eagle Outfitters, Carter’s, Chico’s FAS, Designer Brands, Party City, and Signet Jewelers. The Compensation Committee approved the removal of the following companies due to differing size and/or business focuses/economics: Advance Auto Parts, Columbia Sportswear, Fossil Group, GNC Holdings, O’Reilly  Automotive, and Pier 1 Imports.

      Total Compensation Review

      As part of its process for determining the amount and mix of total compensation to be paid to our named executive officers (other thanin FY19, the Compensation Committee reviewed tally sheets prepared by management containing information for each executive officer regarding, among other things:

      compensation for the last four fiscal years;

      length of service;

      the types and amounts of long-term incentives granted in the last four fiscal years;

      the types and amounts of our Chief Financial Officer). Under Section 162(m),equity securities, both vested and unvested, owned as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal year;

      the proceeds realized from option exercises during the last four fiscal years;

      perquisites and other compensation paid during the last four fiscal years; and

      the severance and other payments that would be received upon the occurrence of certain events, taking into account the proposed compensation to each of these officers in excess of $1,000,000 per year is deductible by us only if it is "performance-based." be paid to such executive officer for the new fiscal year.

      The Compensation Committee believes that tax deductibilitythis comprehensive annual review is important to understanding the total compensation paid and, in certain circumstances, payable to, our executive officers. The Compensation Committee uses these reports to test whether the various forms, targets, mix, and amounts of compensation is an important consideration in establishingpaid and payable to our executives' compensation. For example, the 2010 Omnibus Plan is designed to allowexecutive officers remain consistent with our compensation strategy. Based on its review for FY19, the Compensation Committee to grant awardsbelieves that may qualify for the performance-basedoverall compensation exemption from Section 162(m), such as stock options and PBRSUs, and the AIP, as a subplan of the 2010 Omnibus Plan, also allows annual cash incentive awards that may qualify as performance-based compensation. A number of requirements must be met for particular compensation to so qualify, however, so there can be no assurance that any compensation awarded will be fully deductible under all circumstances. Also,our executive officers was in line with the goalphilosophy and objectives set forth above.

      The Compensation Committee strives to make decisions on each component of providingexecutive compensation within the context of an officer’s entire compensation package, meaning that a decision on one compensation program that enhances stockholder value,component (such as base salary) impacts decisions made on other compensation components (such as annual and long-term incentives). Based upon input received from FW Cook, the Compensation Committee reserves flexibility to approvebelieves that this program balances both the mix of cash and equity compensation, arrangementsthe mix of annual and long-term incentives, and the security ofchange-in-control severance benefits in a way that are not fully tax deductible by us.furthers the compensation objectives discussed above.

      52        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


      LOGO

      Consideration of Most Recent Advisory Stockholder Vote on Executive Compensation

      At the annual meeting of stockholders on January 28, 2011,26, 2017, our stockholders expressed a preference that advisory votes on executive compensation occur every three years.year. In accordance with the results of this vote, the Board determined to implement an advisory vote on executive compensation every three yearsyear until the next required vote on the frequency of stockholder votes on the compensation of executives, which willis scheduled to occur at thisthe 2023 annual meeting. Therefore, the last advisory votes were


      Table of Contents

      notvote was held in 2016 or 20152019 and the next advisory vote on executive compensation will occur at this annual meeting. Please refer to "ProposalProposal 2 — Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation" on page 66Compensation” section of this Proxy Statement for information regarding the advisory(non-binding) resolution regarding the compensation of the Corporation's named executive officers,Company’s NEOs, including the Corporation'sCompany’s compensation practices and principles and their implementation, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. Please refer to "Proposal 3 — Advisory Vote on Frequency of Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation" on page 67 for more information regarding the advisory (non-binding) vote to express the views of stockholders on how frequently advisory votes on executive compensation, such as Proposal 2, will occur.

      At the annual meeting of stockholders on January 30, 2014,31, 2019, in the second advisory vote on executive compensation, over 97%96% of the shares voted were voted in support of the compensation of the Corporation's named executive officers.Company’s NEOs. The Compensation Committee appreciates and values the views of our stockholders. As part of its compensation review, the Compensation Committee considered both the results of the 20142019 advisory vote on executive compensation and feedback from our stockholders, and concluded that the compensation paid to our executive officers and the Corporation'sCompany’s overall executive pay practices have strong stockholder support and have been effective in implementing the Corporation'sCompany’s stated compensation philosophy and objectives. The Compensation Committee recognizes that executive pay practices and notions of sound governance principles continue to evolve. Consequently, the Compensation Committee intends to continue paying close attention to the advice and counsel of its compensation advisors and invites our stockholders to communicate any concerns or opinions on executive pay directly to the Compensation Committee or the Board. Please refer to "Stockholder — Director Communications" on page 13“Corporate Governance, the Board and Its Committees —Communications with the Board” section of this Proxy Statement for information about communicating with the Board.


      Table of Contents


      COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
      MANAGEMENT OF COMPENSATION-RELATED RISK

      We design our executive compensation program to avoid excessive risk-taking. The following are some of the features of our program designed to help us appropriately manage business risk:

      Diversification of incentive-related risk by employing complementary performance measures linked to growth, profitability and capital efficiency;

      A balanced weighting of the various performance measures, to avoid excessive attention on achievement of one measure over another;

      An assortment of vehicles for delivering compensation, including cash and equity-based incentives with different time horizons, to focus our executives on specific objectives that help us achieve our business plan and create an alignment with long-term stockholder interests;

      A compensation recoupment/clawback policy;

      Standardized equity grant procedures; and

      Equity ownership and retention guidelines applicable to all executive officers.

      www.sallybeautyholdings.com        53


      LOGO

      Compensation Committee Report

      The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) ofRegulation S-K included in this Proxy Statement. Based on its review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

      Submitted by the Compensation Committee



      Edward W. Rabin (Chair)
      Katherine Button Bell
      Marshall E. Eisenberg
      Susan R. Mulder

      Submitted by the Compensation Committee

      Edward W. Rabin (Chair)

      Linda Heasley

      Susan R. Mulder

      The foregoing report is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the CorporationCompany under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

      54        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement



      LOGO

      Table of Contents


      EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
      Compensation Tables

      Summary Compensation TableSUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

      The following table contains compensation information for our named executive officers.NEOs. The information included in this table reflects compensation earned by the named executive officersNEOs for services rendered to us for the years ended September 30, 2016, September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014.


      SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

      Name and Principal Position(1)
       Year Salary
      ($)
       Bonus
      ($)
       Stock
      Awards
      ($)(2)
       Option
      Awards
      ($)(3)
       Non-Equity
      Incentive Plan
      Compensation
      ($)(4)
       All Other
      Compensation
      ($)(5)
       Total
      ($)
       

      Christian A. Brickman

        2016  1,013,942     950,006  1,899,990  515,265  18,396  4,397,599 

      President and Chief Executive

        2015  844,038     712,480  1,425,147  430,553  6,638  3,418,856 

      Officer

        2014  250,327(7)    2,199,902  1,099,499    262,315  3,812,043 

      Mark J. Flaherty

        
      2016
        
      532,397
           
      316,669
        
      633,324
        
      162,335
        
      14,185
        
      1,658,910
       

      Former Senior Vice President,

        2015  496,923     458,440  566,712  159,126  14,374  1,695,575 

      Chief Financial Officer

        2014  473,822       979,535  110,622  13,928  1,577,907 

      Matthew O. Haltom

        
      2016
        
      428,846
           
      200,005
        
      399,990
        
      130,776
        
      14,287
        
      1,173,904
       

      Senior Vice President,

        2015  396,539     325,171  300,003  127,210  14,170  1,163,093 

      General Counsel and Secretary

        2014  352,308       523,173  82,389  13,465  971,335 

      Mark G. Spinks

        
      2016
        
      389,423
           
      166,659
        
      333,331
        
      258,435
        
      14,373
        
      1,162,221
       

      President, Beauty Systems Group

        2015  304,615     249,770  300,003  181,709  16,248  1,052,345 

      Sharon Leite

        
      2016
        
      353,365
        
      100,000

      (6)
       
      312,493
        
      312,486
        
      104,564
        
      4,130
        
      1,187,038
       

      President, Sally Beauty

                               

      (1)
      Reflects principal positions held as of September 30, 2016.

      (2)
      Reflects the grant date fair value of the stock awards, determined in accordance with ASC 718. The grant date fair value of restricted stock awards granted in 2015 and 2014, as applicable, was based on the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant. With the exception of Mr. Brickman, none of our named executive officers received any stock awards in fiscal year 2014. For Mr. Brickman, fiscal year 2014 includes the grant date fair value of the restricted stock units granted to him on October 30, 2013 in connection with his service as an independent director on our Board of Directors prior to his appointment to the position of President and Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation ($99,993). The grant date fair value of the PBRSUs granted in 2016 was computed by multiplying (i) the target number of PBRSUs awarded to each named executive officer, which was the assumed probable outcome as of the grant date, by (ii) the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant. Assuming, instead, that the highest level of performance conditions would be achieved, the grant date fair values of the PBRSUs would have been as follows: Mr. Brickman, $1,900,013; Mr. Flaherty, $633,338; Mr. Haltom, $400,010; and Mr. Spinks, $333,318.

      (3)
      Reflects the grant date fair value of the option awards, determined in accordance with ASC 718. The assumptions used in the calculation of the grant date fair values of the option awards are included in Note 7 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016,2019, September 30, 2015,2018 and September 30, 2014, included in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2016, November 12, 2015, and November 13, 2014, respectively.

      (4)
      2017.

      Name and Principal Position (1)

      Fiscal

      Year

      Salary

      ($)

      Bonus

      ($)

      Stock

      Awards

      ($) (2)

      Option

      Awards

      ($) (3)

      Non-Equity

      Incentive Plan

      Compensation

      ($) (4)

      All Other

      Compensation

      ($) (5)

      Total

      ($)

       

      Current NEOs

       

              

       

      Christian A. Brickman

       2019 1,018,462  2,639,992 1,359,995 820,520 12,895 5,851,864

        President and Chief Executive Officer

       2018 1,000,000  1,979,992 1,019,996 650,000 12,480 4,662,468
       

       

      2017

       

       

       

       

      998,346

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      1,016,656

       

       

       

       

      2,033,330

       

       

       

       

      99,829

       

       

       

       

      14,549

       

       

       

       

      4,162,710

       

       

       

      Aaron E. Alt

       2019 692,308  593,981 305,997 600,237 16,354 2,208,877

        Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

       2018 216,923 250,000 937,997 462,000 130,192 184,362 2,181,474

        and President, Sally Beauty Supply

       

       

       

      Mark G. Spinks

       2019 458,308  395,994 203,998 204,756 12,400 1,275,456

        President, Beauty Systems Group

       2018 447,308  395,992 203,999 149,117 12,319 1,208,735
       

       

      2017

       

       

       

       

      411,935

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      183,331

       

       

       

       

      366,666

       

       

       

       

      49,420

       

       

       

       

      13,520

       

       

       

       

      1,024,872

       

       

       

      Scott C. Sherman

       2019 367,385  296,982 152,999 177,590 12,312 1,007,268

        Senior Vice President and Chief Human

       2018 360,000  263,982 135,996 148,370 13,541 921,889

        Resources Officer

       

       

       

      John M. Henrich

       2019 342,369  131,980 67,999 129,993 7,753 680,094

        Senior Vice President, General Counsel and

        Secretary

       

      Former NEO

       

              

       

      Chad L. Selvidge

       2019 266,508  263,978 135,999 127,244 259,064 1,052,793

        Former Senior Vice President and Chief

        Merchandising Officer

       

      (1)

      Reflects principal positions held as of September 30, 2019.

      (2)

      Reflects the grant date fair value of the stock awards (TBRSAs and PBRSUs), determined in accordance with ASC 718. The fair value of all stock awards is calculated using the closing price for shares of our Common Stock on the date of grant. For PBRSUs, the grant date fair value is calculated using the target number of PBRSUs awarded to each NEO, which was the assumed probable outcome as of the grant date. Assuming, instead, that the highest level of performance conditions would be achieved, the grant date fair values of the 2019 PBRSUs would have been as follows: Mr. Brickman, $2,639,998; Mr. Alt, $593,987; Mr. Spinks, $395,991; Mr. Sherman, $296,976; Mr. Henrich, $131,974; and Mr. Selvidge, $263,983; the grant date fair value of the 2018 PBRSUs would have been as follows: Mr. Brickman, $1,979,992; Mr. Spinks, $395,991; and Mr. Sherman, $263,983; and the grant date fair values of the 2017 PBRSUs would have been as follows: Mr. Brickman, $2,033,311; and Mr. Spinks, $366,662. See“Grants of Plan-Based Awards for FY19” table of this Proxy Statement for more details.

      (3)

      Reflects the grant date fair value of the option awards, determined in accordance with ASC 718. The assumptions used in the calculation of the grant date fair values of the option awards are included in Note 7 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019, September 30, 2018, and September 30, 2017, included in our Form10-K filed with the SEC on November 25, 2019, November 14, 2018, and November 15, 2017, respectively.

      (4)

      The amounts reported reflect AIP awards earned for FY19. For information regarding the AIP, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — FY19 Executive Compensation Program — Annual Incentive”of this Proxy Statement.

      (5)

      Amounts reported as “All Other Compensation” for FY19 include the following:

      Name

      Company Matching
      Contributions to
      401(k)

      ($)

      Life Insurance
      Premiums

      ($)

      Relocation

      Expenses

      ($)

      Tax

      Gross-Up

      ($)

      Other

      ($)

      Total

      ($)

       

      Current NEOs

       

            

       

      Christian A. Brickman

       

       

       

      11,215

       

       

       

       

       

      1,080

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      —      

       

       

       

       

       

      600 (a)

       

       

       

       

       

      12,895

       

       

       

       

      Aaron E. Alt

       

       

       

      10,769

       

       

       

       

       

      1,080

       

       

       

       

       

      337

       

       

       

       

       

      1,182 (b)

       

       

       

       

       

      2,986 (c)

       

       

       

       

       

      16,354

       

       

       

       

      Mark G. Spinks

       

       

       

      11,320

       

       

       

       

       

      1,080

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      —      

       

       

       

       

       

      —      

       

       

       

       

       

      12,400

       

       

       

       

      Scott C. Sherman

       

       

       

      11,323

       

       

       

       

       

      989

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      —      

       

       

       

       

       

      —      

       

       

       

       

       

      12,312

       

       

       

       

      John M. Henrich

       

       

       

      6,160

       

       

       

       

       

      813

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      —      

       

       

       

       

       

      780 (d)

       

       

       

       

       

      7,753

       

       

       

       

      Former NEO

       

            

       

      Chad L. Selvidge

       

       

       

       

       

      7,765

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      739

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      10,701(b)

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      239,859 (e)

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      259,064

       

       

       

       

       

      www.sallybeautyholdings.com        55


      LOGO

      (a)

      Reflects payment to Mr. Brickman for reimbursement for an executive physical.

      (b)

      Represents the taxgross-up for COBRA coverage and relocation expenses for Mr. Alt and the taxgross-up for COBRA coverage pursuant to Mr. Selvidge’s separation agreement.

      (c)

      Reflects reimbursement of COBRA coverage for Mr. Alt.

      (d)

      Reflects Mr. Henrich’s mobile device stipend.

      (e)

      Reflects payments and benefits pursuant to Mr. Selvidge’s separation agreement. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” of this Proxy Statement for more details. Mr. Selvidge also received $177,112.67 for allegednon-wage related compensatory damages.

      The amounts reported reflect annual incentive awards earned for our 2016 fiscal year under the AIP. For information regarding the AIP, which is a sub-plan of the 2010 Omnibus Plan, please see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Components for Fiscal 2016 — Annual Cash Incentive Bonus."


      Table of Contents

      (5)
      Amounts reported as "All Other Compensation" for our 2016 fiscal year include the following:
       
       Company
      Matching
      Contributions
      to 401(k) and
      Profit Sharing Plan
      ($)
       Life
      Insurance
      Premiums
      ($)
       Other
      ($)
       Total
      ($)
       

      Christian A. Brickman

        17,574  822    18,396 

      Mark J. Flaherty

        13,133  1,052    14,185 

      Matthew O. Haltom

        13,465  822    14,287 

      Mark G. Spinks

        13,602  771    14,373 

      Sharon Leite

          426  3,704(a) 4,130 

      (a)
      Reflects payment to Ms. Leite to cover the cost of COBRA coverage during the first 2 months of her employment with the Company.

      Perquisites and other personal benefits provided to each of the other named executive officers had an aggregate incremental cost of less than $10,000 and accordingly have been omitted from the table in accordance with SEC rules. For information regarding perquisites, please see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Components for Fiscal 2016 —Benefits and Perquisites."

      (6)
      Reflects Ms. Leite's sign-on bonus.

      (7)
      Includes $47,250 in fees received for his service as an independent director on our Board of Directors through April 25, 2014.

      Table of Contents


      GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR FISCAL 2016
      FY19

       
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
       All Other
      Stock
      Awards:
      Number of
      Shares of
      Stock or
      Units
      (#)(3)
       All Other
      Option
      Awards:
      Number of
      Securities
      Underlying
      Options
      (#)(4)
        
        
       
       
        
       Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) Exercise
      or Base
      Price of
      Option
      Awards
      ($ / Sh)
      (5)
       Grant Date
      Fair Value
      of Stock
      and Option
      Awards
      ($)(6)
       
      Name
       Grant
      Date
       Threshold
      ($)
       Target
      ($)
       Maximum
      ($)
       Threshold
      (#)
       Target
      (#)
       Maximum
      (#)
       

      Christian A. Brickman

           20,716  977,176  4,982,970                      

        10/28/2015           20,256  40,512  81,024           950,006 

        10/28/2015                       302,961  23.45  1,899,990 

      Mark J. Flaherty

           6,527  307,861  2,491,485                      

        10/28/2015           6,752  13,504  27,008           316,669 

        10/28/2015                       100,986  23.45  633,324 

      Matthew O. Haltom

           5,258  248,010  2,491,485                      

        10/28/2015           4,265  8,529  17,058           200,005 

        10/28/2015                       63,780  23.45  399,990 

      Mark G. Spinks

           4,523  225,000  2,491,485                      

        10/28/2015           3,554  7,107  14,214           166,659 

        10/28/2015                       53,151  23.45  333,331 

      Sharon Leite

           4,601  209,139  2,491,485                      

        2/1/2016                       42,711  27.39  312,486 

        2/1/2016                    11,409        312,493 

      (1)
      Reflects threshold, target and maximum bonus opportunities under the financial component of our AIP.

      The Compensation Committee has discretion to reduce or increase the dollar value of an individual officer's AIP award by up to 50 percentage points below or above the percentage of the target award resulting from application of the financial performance formulas, based upon a subjective assessment of the individual's performance, but the adjusted payout cannot exceed such individual's Section 162(m) maximum award. Mr. Brickman's target AIP bonus was 100% of his base salary. The target AIP bonus for each of Messrs. Flaherty, Haltom, and Spinks was 60% of his base salary. Ms. Leite's target annual bonus was 60% of her base salary, with the amount of such bonus pro-rated from Ms. Leite's start date through the end of the 2016 fiscal year. Per her offer letter, she received a guaranteed minimum bonus payout of $104,564, which is equal to 50% of her full award target of 60% base salary prorated by her start date through the end of the fiscal year. Please see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Components for Fiscal 2016 — AIP Criteria Based on Financial Performance" for additionalfollowing table contains information on these targets.

      (2)
      Reflects PBRSUs that are eligible to vest following the conclusion of a three-year performance period based on the level of achievement of goals related to sales growth and ROIC. Please see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Components for Fiscal 2016 — Equity-Based Long-Term Incentive Compensation" for additional information on the PBRSUs.

      (3)
      On February 1, 2016, our Compensation Committee granted an inducement equity award of restricted stock to Ms. Leite pursuantregarding plan-based awards provided during FY19 to the 2010 Omnibus Plan. The restrictions upon this award lapse ratably over a three-year period beginning February 1, 2017.

      (4)
      On October 28, 2015, our Compensation Committee granted options to each of our executive officers (other than Ms. Leite) to purchase shares of our Common Stock under the 2010 Omnibus Plan. These options vest ratably over a three-year period beginning on September 30, 2016. On February 1, 2016, our Compensation Committee granted an inducement equity award of stock options to Ms. Leite pursuant to the 2010 Omnibus Plan. These options vest ratably over a three-year period beginning on February 1, 2017.

      (5)
      The exercise price of the options is equal to the closing price of our Common Stock on the NYSE on the grant date.

      (6)
      Reflects the grant date fair value of the stock ($27.39 for Mrs. Leite's' February 1, 2016 award and $23.45 for the October 28, 2015 awards) and option awards ($7.316 for Ms. Leite's February 1, 2016 award and $6.271 for the October 28, 2015 awards) determined in accordance with ASC 178. The assumptions used in the calculation of the grant date fair value of the option awards are included in Note 7 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 included in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2016. The grant date fair value of the stock awards is based on the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant.
      NEOs:

           

       

      AIP

        

       

      PBRSUs

        

       

      TBRSAs

        

       

      Options

          
           

      Estimated Possible Payouts

      UnderNon-Equity Incentive

      Plan Awards (1)

           

        

      Estimated Possible Payouts

      Under Equity Incentive

      Plan Awards (2)

           

        

      All Other
      Stock
      Awards:
      Number of
      Shares of
      Stock or

      Units
      (#) (3)

        

      All Other
      Option
      Awards:
      Number of
      Securities
      Underlying

      Options
      (#) (4)

        

      Exercise
      or Base
      Price of
      Option

      Awards
      ($/Sh) (5)

        

      Grant Date
      Fair Value
      of Stock
      and Option

      Awards
      ($) (6)

       
           Name 

      Grant

      Date

        

      Threshold

      ($)

        

      Target

      ($)

        

      Maximum

      ($)

        

      Threshold

      (#)

        

      Target

      (#)

        

      Maximum

      (#)

       

       

      Current NEOs

       

                                                  

       

      Christian A. Brickman

          254,630   1,018,521   1,935,190           
         01/31/19       38,327   76,655   153,310       1,319,999 
         11/01/18           72,767     1,319,993 
         

       

      11/01/18

       

       

       

                                    

       

      232,081

       

       

       

        

       

      18.14

       

       

       

        

       

      1,359,995

       

       

       

       

      Aaron E. Alt

          138,521   554,082   1,052,756           
         01/31/19       8,623   17,247   34,494       296,993 
         11/01/18           16,372     296,988 
         11/01/18                               52,218   18.14   305,997 

       

      Mark G. Spinks

          75,396   320,834   609,585           
         01/31/19       5,749   11,498   22,996       197,996 
         11/01/18           10,915     197,998 
         

       

      11/01/18

       

       

       

                                    

       

      34,812

       

       

       

        

       

      18.14

       

       

       

        

       

      203,998

       

       

       

       

      Scott C. Sherman

          55,111   220,445   418,846           
         01/31/19       4,311   8,623   17,246       148,488 
         11/01/18           8,186     148,494 
         

       

      11/01/18

       

       

       

                                    

       

      26,109

       

       

       

        

       

      18.14

       

       

       

        

       

      152,999

       

       

       

       

      John M. Henrich

          40,210   160,840   314,529           
         01/31/19       1,916   3,832   7,664       65,987 
         11/01/18           3,638     65,993 
         

       

      11/01/18

       

       

       

                                    

       

      11,604

       

       

       

        

       

      18.14

       

       

       

        

       

      67,999

       

       

       

       

      Former NEO

       

                                                  

       

      Chad L. Selvidge (7)

          39,488   157,950   300,105           
         01/31/19       3,832   7,665   15,330       131,991 
         11/01/18           7,276     131,987 
         

       

      11/01/18

       

       

       

                                    

       

      23,208

       

       

       

        

       

      18.14

       

       

       

        

       

      135,999

       

       

       

      (1)

      Reflects potential cash award payouts under the AIP. Thresholds are based on financial measures only (no threshold for Strategic Initiatives). See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — FY19 Executive Compensation Program — Annual Incentive” of this Proxy Statement for more details. Actual AIP awards are shown in the “Summary Compensation Table” of this Proxy Statement under “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation”. The amounts shown for Mr. Selvidge reflect prorated potential cash award payouts based on his separation.

      (2)

      Reflects potential payouts of PBRSUs granted on January 31, 2019 under the 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — FY19 Executive Compensation Program — Long-Term Incentives” of this Proxy Statement for more details.

      (3)

      Reflects TBRSAs granted on November 1, 2018 under the 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — FY19 Executive Compensation Program — Long-Term Incentives” of this Proxy Statement for more details.

      (4)

      Reflects options granted on November 1, 2018 under the 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — FY19 Executive Compensation Program — Long-Term Incentives” of this Proxy Statement for more details.

      (5)

      The exercise price of options is equal to the closing price for shares of our Common Stock on the grant date.

      (6)

      Reflects a grant date fair value of $5.86 per option (granted on November 1, 2018), $17.22 per PBRSU (granted on January 31, 2019), and $18.14 per TBRSA (granted on November 1, 2018).

      (7)

      Mr. Selvidge forfeited his unvested outstanding equity awards in connection with his separation.

      56        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement



      LOGO

      Table of Contents


      OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 20162019 FISCALYEAR-END

       
       Option Awards Stock Awards 
       
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
       Equity
      Incentive
      Plan Awards:
      Market or
      Payout Value
      of Unearned
      Shares,
      Units or
      Other Rights
      That Have
      Not Vested
      ($)(16)
       
       
        
        
        
        
        
        
       Equity
      Incentive
      Plan Awards:
      Number of
      Unearned
      Shares, Units
      or Other
      Rights That
      Have Not
      Vested
      (#)
       
       
       Number of
      Securities
      Underlying
      Unexercised
      Options (#)
       Number of
      Securities
      Underlying
      Unexercised
      Options (#)
        
        
        
       Market
      Value of
      Shares or
      Units of
      Stock That
      Have Not
      Vested(16)
      ($)
       
       
        
        
       Number of
      Shares or
      Units of
      Stock That
      Have Not
      Vested
      (#)
       
       
       Option
      Exercise
      Price
       Option
      Expiration
      Date
       
      Name
       Exercisable Unexercisable 

      Christian A. Brickman

        65,476  65,476(7) 25.36  06/02/2024  41,402(8) 1,063,203       

        81,242  81,242(9) 29.20  10/29/2024  12,200(10) 313,296       

        100,987  201,974(12) 23.45  10/28/2025        40,512(13) 1,040,348 

      Mark J Flaherty

        
      10,076

      (1)
       
        
      5.24
        
      10/22/2018
                   

        6,484(3)   19.21  10/26/2021             

        598  22,799(4) 23.49  10/29/2022  5,960(5) 153,053       

        54,875  21,625(6) 26.30  10/30/2023             

        32,306  32,306(9) 29.20  10/29/2024  7,850(10) 201,588       

        33,662  67,324(12) 23.45  10/28/2025        13,504(13) 346,783 

      Matthew O. Haltom

        
      30,918
        
      12,169

      (4)
       
      23.49
        
      10/29/2022
        
      2,862

      (5)
       
      73,496
             

        34,650  11,550(6) 26.30  10/30/2023             

        17,102  17,102(9) 29.20  10/29/2024  5,568(10) 142,986       

        21,260  42,520(12) 23.45  10/28/2025        8,529(13) 219,025 

      Mark G. Spinks

        
      25,000

      (2)
       
        
      11.39
        
      10/19/2020
                   

        15,324(3)   19.21  10/26/2021             

        10,746  3,582(4) 23.49  10/29/2022  240(5) 6,163       

        13,275  4,425(6) 26.30  10/30/2023             

        17,102  17,102(9) 29.20  10/29/2024  2,566(10) 65,895       

                2,236(11) 57,420       

        17,717  35,434(12) 23.45  10/28/2025        7,107(13) 182,508 

      Sharon Leite

        
        
      42,711

      (14)
       
      27.39
        
      2/1/2026
        
      11,409

      (15)
       
      292,983
             
      (1)
      On October 22, 2008, our Compensation Committee granted Mr. Flaherty 175,000 options to purchase shares of our Common Stock pursuant to

      The following table contains information about outstanding option and stock awards held by the 2007 Omnibus Plan. These options vested in four annual installments beginning on October 21, 2009, and therefore were fully vested as of October 21, 2012.

      (2)
      On October 19, 2010, our Compensation Committee granted Mr. Spinks 25,000 options to purchase shares of our Common Stock pursuant to the 2010 Omnibus Plan. These options vested in four annual installments beginning on October 18, 2011, and therefore were fully vested as of October 18, 2014.

      (3)
      On October 26, 2011, our Compensation Committee granted options to purchase shares of our Common Stock pursuant to the 2010 Omnibus Plan in the following amounts: Mr. Flaherty, 107,312; and Mr. Spinks, 15,324. These options vested in four annual installments beginning on October 25, 2012, and therefore were fully vested as of October 25, 2015.

      (4)
      On October 29, 2012, our Compensation Committee granted options to purchase shares of our Common Stock pursuant to the 2010 Omnibus Plan in the following amounts: Mr. Flaherty, 91,196; Mr. Haltom, 48,676; and Mr. Spinks, 14,328. These options vest in four annual installments beginning on October 28, 2013. Mr. Flaherty forfeited the unvested portion of these options in connection with his separation.

      (5)
      On October 29, 2012, our Compensation Committee granted shares of time-based restricted stock pursuant to the 2010 Omnibus Plan in the following amounts: Mr. Flaherty, 14,900; Mr. Haltom, 7,155; and Mr. Spinks, 600. The restrictions upon these awards lapse in five annual installments beginning on October 28, 2013. Mr. Flaherty forfeited the unvested portion of his restricted stock in connection with his separation.

      (6)
      On October 30, 2013, our Compensation Committee granted options to purchase shares of our Common Stock pursuant to the 2010 Omnibus Plan in the following amounts: Mr. Flaherty, 86,500; Mr. Haltom, 46,200; and Mr. Spinks, 17,700. These

      Table of Contents

        options vest in four annual installments beginningNEOs on September 30, 2014. Mr. Flaherty forfeited the unvested portion of these options in connection with his separation.2019:

      (7)
      On June 2, 2014, our Compensation Committee granted options to purchase shares of our Common Stock pursuant to the 2010 Omnibus Plan to Mr. Brickman in the amount of 130,952 in connection with the executive management transition plan. These options vest in four annual installments beginning on June 1, 2015.

      (8)
      On June 2, 2014, our Compensation Committee granted shares of time-based restricted stock pursuant to the 2010 Omnibus Plan to Mr. Brickman in the amount of 82,804 in connection with the executive management transition plan. The restrictions upon these awards lapse in four annual installments beginning on June 1, 2015.

      (9)
      On October 29, 2014 our Compensation Committee granted options to purchase shares of our Common Stock pursuant to the 2010 Omnibus Plan in the following amounts: Mr. Brickman, 162,484; Mr. Flaherty, 64,612; and Mr. Haltom and Mr. Spinks, 34,204. These options vest in four annual installments beginning on September 30, 2015. Mr. Flaherty forfeited the unvested portion of these options in connection with his separation.

      (10)
      On October 29, 2014 our Compensation Committee granted shares of time-based restricted stock pursuant to the 2010 Omnibus Plan in the following amounts: Mr. Brickman, 24,400; Mr. Flaherty, 15,700; Mr. Haltom, 11,136; and Mr. Spinks, 5,132. The restrictions upon these awards lapse in four annual installments beginning on September 30, 2015. Mr. Flaherty forfeited the unvested portion of his restricted stock in connection with his separation.

      (11)
      On July 31, 2015, our Compensation Committee granted shares of time-based restricted stock pursuant to the 2010 Omnibus Plan to Mr. Spinks in the amount of 3,354 in connection with his promotion to President of Beauty Systems Group, LLC. The restrictions upon these awards lapse in three annual installments beginning on July 31, 2016.

      (12)
      On October 28, 2015 our Compensation Committee granted options to purchase shares of our Common Stock pursuant to the 2010 Omnibus Plan in the following amounts: Mr. Brickman, 302,961; Mr. Flaherty, 100,986; Mr. Haltom, 63,780; and Mr. Spinks, 53,151. These options vest in three annual installments beginning on September 30, 2016. Mr. Flaherty forfeited the unvested portion of these options in connection with his separation.

      (13)
      On October 28, 2015, our Compensation Committee granted PBRSUs to each of the named executive officers, other than Ms. Leite. The number of PBRSUs shown reflects estimated payout at the target level. The PBRSUs do not vest until the end of the three-year performance period, and the payout level will depend on the actual level of achievement of sales growth and ROIC goals. Mr. Flaherty forfeited his PBRSUs in connection with his separation.

      (14)
      On February 1, 2016, our Compensation Committee granted options to purchase shares of our Common Stock pursuant to the 2010 Omnibus Plan to Ms. Leite in the amount of 42,711 in connection with her employment as President of Sally Beauty Supply, LLC. These options vest in three annual installments beginning on February 1, 2017.

      (15)
      On February 1, 2016, our Compensation Committee granted shares of time-based restricted stock pursuant to the 2010 Omnibus Plan to Ms. Leite in the amount of 11,409 in connection with her employment as President of Sally Beauty Supply, LLC. The restrictions upon these awards lapse in three annual installments beginning on February 1, 2017.

      (16)
      Calculated by reference to the closing price for shares of our Common Stock on the NYSE on September 30, 2016, which was $25.68.

           Option Awards  Stock Awards 
                        TBRSAs  PBRSUs 

      Name

       

      Grant

      Date

        

      Number of
      Securities
      Underlying
      Unexercised
      Options

      Exercisable

      (#)

        

      Number of
      Securities
      Underlying
      Unexercised
      Options

      Unexercisable

      (#) (1)

        

      Option
      Exercise
      Price

      ($)

        Option
      Expiration
      Date
        Number of
      Shares or
      Units of
      Stock That
      Have Not
      Vested
      (#) (2)
        

      Market Value

      of Shares or
      Units of
      Stock That
      Have Not
      Vested
      ($) (4)

        Equity Incentive
      Plan Awards:
      Number of
      Unearned
      Shares, Units or
      Other Rights That
      Have Not Vested
      (#) (3)
        Equity Incentive
      Plan Awards:
      Market or
      Payout Value of
      Unearned Shares,
      Units or Other
      Rights That Have
      Not Vested
      ($) (4)
       

       

      Current NEOs

       

                                          

       

      Christian A. Brickman

        01/31/19           76,655   1,141,393 
         11/01/18   77,360   154,721   18.14   11/01/28   48,512   722,344    
         11/01/17   140,133   70,067   17.42   11/01/27   18,944   282,076   56,831   846,214 
         11/01/16   321,409      25.53   11/01/26      39,822   592,950 
         10/28/15   302,961      23.45   10/28/25       
         10/29/14   162,484      29.20   10/29/24       
         

       

      06/02/14

       

       

       

        

       

      130,952

       

       

       

        

       

       

       

       

        

       

      25.36

       

       

       

        

       

      06/02/24

       

       

       

                      

       

      Aaron E. Alt

        01/31/19           17,247   256,808 
         11/01/18   17,406   34,812   18.14   11/01/28   10,915   162,524    
         

       

      05/22/18

       

       

       

        

       

      32,695

       

       

       

        

       

      65,392

       

       

       

        

       

      15.10

       

       

       

        

       

      05/22/28

       

       

       

        

       

      41,413

       

       

       

        

       

      616,640

       

       

       

              

       

      Mark G. Spinks

        01/31/19           11,498   171,205 
         11/01/18   11,604   23,208   18.14   11/01/28   7,277   108,355    
         11/01/17   28,026   14,014   17.42   11/01/27   3,789   56,418   11,366   169,240 
         11/01/16   57,959      25.53   11/01/26      7,181   106,925 
         10/28/15   53,151      23.45   10/28/25       
         10/29/14   34,204      29.20   10/29/24       
         10/30/13   17,700      26.30   10/30/23       
         10/29/12   14,328      23.49   10/29/22       
         10/26/11   15,324      19.21   10/26/21       
         

       

      10/19/10

       

       

       

        

       

      25,000

       

       

       

        

       

       

       

       

        

       

      11.39

       

       

       

        

       

      10/19/20

       

       

       

                      

       

      Scott C. Sherman

        01/31/19           8,623   128,396 
         11/01/18   8,703   17,406   18.14   11/01/28   5,458   81,270    
         11/01/17   18,684   9,342   17.42   11/01/27   2,526   37,612   7,577   112,822 
         11/01/16   14,753      25.53   11/01/26      1,827   27,204 
         10/28/15   13,287      23.45   10/28/25       
         10/29/14   6,840      29.20   10/29/24       
         10/30/13   8,900      26.30   10/30/23       
         

       

      10/29/12

       

       

       

        

       

      2,628

       

       

       

        

       

       

       

       

        

       

      23.49

       

       

       

        

       

      10/29/22

       

       

       

            

       

      John M. Henrich

        01/31/19           3,832   57,058 
         11/01/18   3,868   7,736   18.14   11/01/28   2,426   36,123    
         11/01/17   8,174   4,087   17.42   11/01/27   1,105   16,453   3,315   49,360 
         11/01/16   13,172      25.53   11/01/26      1,632   24,300 
         10/28/15   10,629      23.45   10/28/25       
         10/29/14   1,216      29.20   10/29/24       
         10/30/13   1,580      26.30   10/30/23       
         

       

      10/29/12

       

       

       

        

       

      424

       

       

       

        

       

       

       

       

        

       

      23.49

       

       

       

        

       

      10/29/22

       

       

       

                      

       

      Former NEO

       

                                 

       

      Chad L. Selvidge (5)

                                 

      (1)

      The unvested options vest as follows:

                

           Grant   Vest Date      
        

      Name

        Date   05/22/20   09/30/20   05/22/21   09/30/21   Total 
        

       

      Current NEOs

                                    
       

       

      Christian A. Brickman

         11/01/18      77,360      77,361    154,721 
           

       

      11/01/17

       

       

       

              

       

      70,067

       

       

       

                   

       

      70,067

       

       

       

       

       

      Aaron E. Alt

         11/01/18      17,406      17,406    34,812 
           

       

      05/22/18

       

       

       

         

       

      32,696

       

       

       

              

       

      32,696

       

       

       

              

       

      65,392

       

       

       

       

       

      Mark G. Spinks

         11/01/18      11,604      11,604    23,208 
           

       

      11/01/17

       

       

       

              

       

      14,014

       

       

       

                   

       

      14,014

       

       

       

       

       

      Scott C. Sherman

         11/01/18      8,703      8,703    17,406 
          

       

      11/01/17

       

       

       

           

       

      9,342

       

       

       

             

       

      9,342

       

       

       

       

       

      John M. Henrich

         11/01/18      3,868      3,868    7,736 
           

       

      11/01/17

       

       

       

              

       

      4,087

       

       

       

                   

       

      4,087

       

       

       

      www.sallybeautyholdings.com        57



      LOGO

      (2)

      The unvested TBRSAs vest as follows:

            Grant   Vest Date      

                

       

      Name

        Date   05/22/20   09/30/20   05/22/21   09/30/21   Total 
        

       

      Current NEOs

       

                                    
       

       

      Christian A. Brickman

         11/01/18      24,256      24,256    48,512 
           

       

      11/01/17

       

       

       

              

       

      18,944

       

       

       

                   

       

      18,944

       

       

       

       

      Aaron E. Alt

         11/01/18      5,457      5,458    10,915 
           

       

      05/22/18

       

       

       

         

       

      20,706

       

       

       

              

       

      20,707

       

       

       

              

       

      41,413

       

       

       

       

      Mark G. Spinks

         11/01/18      3,638      3,639    7,277 
           

       

      11/01/17

       

       

       

              

       

      3,789

       

       

       

                   

       

      3,789

       

       

       

       

      Scott C. Sherman

         11/01/18      2,729      2,729    5,458 
          

       

      11/01/17

       

       

       

           

       

      2,526

       

       

       

             

       

      2,526

       

       

       

       

      John M. Henrich

         11/01/18      1,213      1,213    2,426 
           

       

      11/01/17

       

       

       

              

       

      1,105

       

       

       

                   

       

      1,105

       

       

       

      (3)

      The potential payout dates for the unearned PBRSUs are as follows (shown at target):

            Grant   Performance   Potential Payout Date      

                

       

      Name

        Date   Period   11/29/19   11/29/20   11/29/21   Total 
        

       

      Current NEOs

       

                                    
       

       

      Christian A. Brickman

         01/31/19    FY19-21        76,655    76,655 
          11/01/17    FY18-20      56,831      56,831 
           

       

      11/01/16

       

       (a) 

       

         

       

      FY17-19

       

       

       

         

       

      39,822

       

       

       

                   

       

      39,822

       

       

       

       

       

      Aaron E. Alt

         01/31/19    FY19-21              17,247    17,247 
       

       

      Mark G. Spinks

         01/31/19    FY19-21        11,498    11,498 
          11/01/17    FY18-20      11,366      11,366 
           

       

      11/01/16

       

       (a) 

       

         

       

      FY17-19

       

       

       

         

       

      7,181

       

       

       

                   

       

      7,181

       

       

       

       

       

      Scott C. Sherman

         01/31/19    FY19-21        8,623    8,623 
          11/01/17    FY18-20      7,577      7,577 
           

       

      11/01/16

       

       (a) 

       

         

       

      FY17-19

       

       

       

         

       

      1,827

       

       

       

                   

       

      1,827

       

       

       

       

       

      John M. Henrich

         01/31/19    FY19-21        3,832    3,832 
          11/01/17    FY18-20      3,315      3,315 
           

       

      11/01/16

       

       (a) 

       

         

       

      FY17-19

       

       

       

         

       

      1,632

       

       

       

                   

       

      1,632

       

       

       

      (a)

      TheFY17-19 PBRSUs were not earned and were cancelled without payout. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – FY19 Executive Compensation Program – Long-Term Incentives” of this Proxy Statement for more details.

      (4)

      Value based on the closing price for shares of our Common Stock on September 30, 2019 of $14.89.

      (5)

      Mr. Selvidge’s unvested outstanding equity awards were forfeited in connection with his separation.

      Table of Contents


      FISCAL 2016 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
      IN FY19

       
       Option Awards Stock Awards 
      Name
       Number of Shares
      Acquired on Exercise
      (#)
       Value Realized
      on Exercise
      ($)
       Number of Shares
      Acquired on Vesting
      (#)
       Value Realized
      on Vesting
      ($)
       

      Christian A. Brickman

            26,801 $765,464(1)

      Mark J. Flaherty

        71,512 $850,753(2) 11,905 $287,925(3)

      Matthew O. Haltom

        24,153 $219,783(4) 5,215 $128,500(5)

      Mark G. Spinks

        7,500 $139,575(6) 3,121 $82,622(7)

      Sharon Leite

               

      (1)
      Reflects

      The following table contains information about options exercised, stock vested and the vesting of a portion of the restricted stock awards granted to Mr. Brickman. The value realized on vesting was computed based onby the following:

      NEOs during FY19:

          Option Awards  Stock Awards (1)

      Name

        

      Number of Shares

      Acquired on Exercise

      (#)

        

      Value Realized

      On Exercise

      ($)

        

      Number of Shares

      Acquired on Vesting

      (#)

        

      Value Realized

      On Vesting

      ($)

         

      Current NEOs

                    
         

      Christian A. Brickman

            43,199  643,233
         

      Aaron E. Alt

            26,163  421,248
         

      Mark G. Spinks

            11,136  177,869
         

      Scott C. Sherman

              6,181    95,048
         

      John M. Henrich

              3,058    47,942
         

      Former NEO

                    
         

      Chad L. Selvidge

              1,187    21,532

      (1)

      Value realized on vesting for TBRSAs and PBRSUs is equal to the closing price for shares of our Common Stock on the date of vesting times the number of shares acquired upon vesting. The “Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting” and the “Value Realized on Vesting” include shares that were withheld for taxes at the time of vesting.

      58        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


       
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
       
       Date of
      Award

        
       Vesting Date
        
       Number of Shares
      Vesting

        
       Market Price at
      Vesting

        
         10/29/2014    09/30/2016      6,100    $25.68  
         06/02/2014    06/01/2016    20,701    $29.41  
      (2)
      Reflects

      LOGO

      NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

      The following table contains information about the exerciseamounts deferred by the NEOs as of certain options granted to Mr. Flaherty. The value realized on exercise was computed based on the following:

       
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
       
       Date of
      Award

        
       Exercise Date
        
       Number of Options
      Exercised

        
       Market Price at
      Exercise

        
       Exercise Price
        
        10/30/2013   04/04/2016    10,000   $32.39    $26.30  
        10/22/2008   04/04/2016    10,000   $32.39    $  5.24  
        10/29/2012   02/04/2016 - 04/04/2016    23,000   $29.30 - $32.39    $23.49  
        10/26/2011   02/04/2016 - 04/04/2016    21,000   $29.30 - $32.39    $19.21  
        10/21/2009   11/17/2015      3,172   $25.00    $  7.42  
        07/23/2008   11/17/2015      2,436   $25.00    $  7.42  
        10/24/2007   11/17/2015      1,904   $25.00    $  8.80  
      (3)
      Reflects the vesting of a portion of the restricted stock awards granted to Mr. Flaherty. The value realized on vesting was computed based on the following:
       
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
       
       Date of
      Award

        
       Vesting Date
        
       Number of Shares
      Vesting

        
       Market Price at
      Vesting

        
        10/29/2014    09/30/2016    3,925    $25.68  
        10/29/2012    10/28/2015    2,980    $23.45  
        10/19/2010    10/18/2015    5,000    $23.45  
      (4)
      Reflects the exercise of certain options granted to Mr. Haltom. The value realized on exercise was computed based on the following:
       
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
       
       Date of
      Award

        
       Exercise Date
        
       Number of Options
      Exercised

        
       Market Price at
      Exercise

        
       Exercise Price
        
        10/29/2012   02/04/2016      5,589   $29.30    $23.49  
        10/26/2011   02/04/2016    18,564   $29.30    $19.21  

      Table of Contents

      (5)
      Reflects the vesting of a portion of the restricted stock awards granted to Mr. Haltom. The value realized on vesting was computed based on the following:
       
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
       
       Date of
      Award

        
       Vesting Date
        
       Number of Shares
      Vesting

        
       Market Price at
      Vesting

        
        10/29/2014    09/30/2016    2,784    $25.68  
        10/29/2012    10/28/2015    1,431    $23.45  
        10/19/2010    10/18/2015    1,000    $23.45  
      (6)
      Reflects the exercise of certain options granted to Mr. Spinks. The value realized on exercise was computed based on the following:
       
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
       
       Date of
      Award

        
       Exercise Date
        
       Number of Options
      Exercised

        
       Market Price at
      Exercise

        
       Exercise Price
        
        10/21/2009   11/20/2015    7,500   $26.03    $7.42  
      (7)
      Reflects the vesting of a portion of the restricted stock awards granted to Mr. Spinks. The value realized on vesting was computed based on the following:
       
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
       
       Date of Award
        
       Vesting Date
        
       Number of Shares Vesting
        
       Market Price at Vesting
        
        10/29/2014 ��  09/30/2016    1,283    $25.68  
        07/31/2015    07/31/2016    1,118    $29.33  
        10/29/2012    10/28/2015       120    $23.45  
        10/19/2010    10/18/2015       600    $23.45  


      Fiscal 2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

       
        
        
        
        
        
        
       
       Name
        
       Executive
      Contributions in
      Last
      Fiscal Year
      ($)

        
       Aggregate
      Balance at
      Last Fiscal
      Year-End

        
        Christian A. Brickman(1)(2)       $206,955  
        Mark J. Flaherty          
        Matthew O. Haltom          
        Mark G. Spinks          
        Sharon Leite          
      (1)
      Reflects 8,059 restricted stock units granted to Mr. Brickman pursuant to the 2010 Omnibus Plan for his service as an independent director on our Board of Directors prior to his appointment to the position of President and Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation. Pursuant to Mr. Brickman's restricted stock election these restricted stock units will convert to shares of Common Stock on the date of his separation from service as a member of our Board of Directors. The grant date fair value of these restricted stock units was included in the "Stock Awards" column of the Summary Compensation table for fiscal year 2014.

      (2)
      Calculated by reference to the closing price for shares of our Common Stock on the NYSE on September 30, 2016, which was $25.68.

      2019:

      Table of Contents

      Name

        

      Executive Contributions

      in Last Fiscal Year

      ($)

         

      Aggregate Balance

      at Last Fiscal Year-End

      ($)

       
        

      Current NEOs

              
        

      Christian A. Brickman

             119,999 (1) 
        

      Aaron E. Alt

              
        

      Mark G. Spinks

              
        

      Scott C. Sherman

              
        

      John M. Henrich

              
        

      Former NEO

              
        

      Chad L. Selvidge

              

      (1)

      Calculated by reference to the closing price for shares of our Common Stock on September 30, 2019 of $14.89. Reflects the value of 8,059 restricted stock units granted to Mr. Brickman pursuant to the 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan for his service as an independent director on our Board of Directors prior to his appointment to the position of President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Pursuant to Mr. Brickman’s election, these restricted stock units will convert to shares of our Common Stock on the date of his separation from service as a member of our Board of Directors.

      www.sallybeautyholdings.com        59



      LOGO

      POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

      LOGO

      Executive Officer Severance Agreements

              We have severance agreements with certainThe following table summarizes the estimated value of our executive officers, includingthe payments and benefits that each of our named executive officers. Each severance agreement provides that if, in the 24 months following a "change in control," which is defined in the severance agreements and described below, the executive'sNEOs would receive upon termination of employment is terminated by us without "cause"under various circumstances or by the executive for "good reason," then the executive will be entitled to certain benefits. These benefits include (i) a cash payment equal to the executive's annual bonus, as determined in accordance with our annual incentive plan, pro-rated to reflect the portion of the year elapsed prior to the executive's termination, (ii) a lump-sum cash payment equal to a multiple of the executive's annual base salary at the time of termination plus a multiple of the average dollar amount of the executive's actual or annualized annual bonus in respect of the five fiscal years preceding termination (or, such portion thereof during which the executive performed services for us if he has been employed by us for less than the five year period), (iii) any accrued but unpaid salary and vacation pay, and (iv) continued medical and welfare benefits, on the same terms as prior to termination, for a period of 24 months following termination. If the executive's employment is terminated by us for "cause," by the executive for any reason other than "good reason," or as a result of the executive's death or disability, then the executive will be entitled to receive a cash amount equal to any accrued but unpaid salary and vacation pay.

              For purposes of the severance agreements, "change in control" generally includes:

        the acquisition by any person of 20% or more of the voting power of our outstanding Common Stock;

        a change in the majority of the incumbent Board of Directors;

        certain reorganizations, mergers or consolidations of us involving a change of ownership of 50% or more of our common stock or sales of substantially all of our assets; or

        stockholder approval of our complete liquidation or dissolution.

      control. The severance payment multiples for each of the named executive officers are set forth in the following table.

      Executive Officer
      Multiple

      Christian A. Brickman

      1.99

      Mark J. Flaherty*


      1.99

      Matthew O. Haltom


      1.99

      Mark Spinks


      1.99

      Sharon M. Leite


      1.99

      *
      Mr. Flaherty's severance agreement expired in connection with his separation.

      Table of Contents

      Code Section 280G Cut-Back

              Pursuant to the terms of the severance agreements, any payments to the executive under such agreements will be reduced soamounts shown assume that the present valuetriggering event (termination of such payments plus any other "parachute payments" as determined under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code will not, in the aggregate, exceed 2.99 times the executive's average taxable income from us over the five-year period ending prior to the year in whichemployment or a change in control occurs. However, no such reduction will apply to payments that do not constitute "excess parachute payments" under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code.

      Equity Awards

      2007 Omnibus Plan and 2010 Omnibus Plan

              Pursuant to the 2007 Omnibus Plan and the 2010 Omnibus Plan, collectively the Omnibus Plans, in the event of a change in control, as defined below, the Compensation Committee may determine that all outstanding awards will be honored or assumed, or new rights substituted therefor, by the surviving company; provided that any substitute award must (i) be based on shares of common stock that are traded on an established U.S. securities market; (ii) provide the participant substantially equivalent or more favorable terms and conditions than those applicable to the old award; (iii) have substantially equivalent economic value to the old award (determined at the time of the change in control); and (iv) provide that in the event that the participant is involuntarily terminated within two years after the change in control, or such other period specified by the Compensation Committee, the award will vest.

              If the Compensation Committee does not provide for substitute awards as described above or make another determination with respect to the treatment of awards, then, upon the occurrence of a change in control:

        all outstanding options and stock appreciation rights will become exercisable immediately before the change in control;

        all time-based vesting restrictions on restricted stock and restricted stock units will lapse immediately before the change in control;

        shares of common stock underlying awards of restricted stock units and deferred stock units (other than performance awards) will be issued immediately before the change in control; and

        with respect to performance awards, the performance period will end as of the change in control and the participant will earn a pro rata payout equal to the product of the target opportunity and the payout percentage that corresponds as closely as possible to the actual level of achievement of performance goals against target, measured as of the date of the change in control*; or

        at the Compensation Committee's discretion, each award will be canceled in exchange for an amount equal to a value determined in accordance with the Omnibus Plans, based on the change in control price.

              For purposes of the Omnibus Plans, the term "change in control" generally means the first to occur of:

        the acquisition by any person, other than us, our subsidiaries, our employee benefit plans, or a certain designated fund or its affiliates, of 50% or more of the voting power of our outstanding Common Stock;


      *
      In connection with the grant of the PBRSUs in October 2015, the Compensation Committee determined that upon the occurrence of a change of control, such PBRSUs will be canceled in exchange for an amount equal to the change in control price multiplied by the target number of PBRSUs granted.

      Table of Contents

        a change in the majority of our incumbent directors within any 24 month period;

        certain mergers or consolidations involving a change in ownership of 50% or more of our Common Stock or the sale of substantially all of our assets; or stockholder approval of our liquidation or dissolution.

              Pursuant to the Omnibus Plans, if the grantee's employment terminated:

        for "cause," (i) all of his or her options (both vested and unvested) will be forfeited and cancelled, and (ii) any outstanding shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units or performance awards will be forfeited and cancelled as of the date of such termination;

        due to the grantee's death or disability, (i) his or her options will become immediately exercisable as to the number of shares previously vested and that would have vested as of the next vesting date after the date of termination, and the options, to the extent so vested, will remain exercisable until the 12 month anniversary of the date of termination, (ii) any of his or her option shares that are not so vested will be forfeited and cancelled as of the date of the termination, (iii) his or her restricted stock or restricted stock units will vest as to the number of shares that would have vested as of the next vesting date after the date of termination, (iv) any shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units that are not so vested will be forfeited and cancelled as of the date of the termination, and (v) the payout opportunities attainable under all of his or her outstanding performance-based awards will vest based on actual performance through the end of the performance period, and the awards will payout on a pro-rata basis, based on the time elapsed prior to the date of termination;

        due to the grantee's retirement (as defined in the Omnibus Plans), and unless the grantee agrees to certain restricted covenants described below, (i) any options that are exercisable as of the date of retirement will remain exercisable until the earlier of 12 months and the expiration of the option term, (ii) any unvested options will be forfeited and cancelled as of the date of the termination, and (iii) any outstanding shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units or performance awards will be forfeited and cancelled as of the date of such termination; or

        for any reason other than as described above, (i) any options that are exercisable as of the date of termination will remain exercisable until the earlier of 60 days and the expiration of the option term, (ii) any unvested options will be forfeited and cancelled as of the date of the termination; and (iii) any outstanding shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units or performance awards will be forfeited and cancelled as of the date of such termination.

              The Omnibus Plans contain certain restrictive covenants, including non-competition, non-solicitation, non-disclosure and non-disparagement covenants, that apply to the holder of an option during the term of his or her employment, any post-termination exercise period, and the one-year period following the expiration of any post-termination exercise period. If an option holder violates any of these covenants, then any options, to the extent unexercised, will automatically terminate and be cancelled upon the first date of the violation and, in the case of the termination of the grantee's employment for "cause," he or she will remit to us in cash, to the extent applicable, the excess of (A) the greater of the closing price for shares of our Common Stock on (i) the date of exercise and (ii) the date of sale of the shares of Common Stock underlying the options, over (B) the exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the options (without reduction for any shares of Common Stock surrendered or attested to) the grantee realized from exercising all or a portion of the options within the period commencing six months prior to the termination of his or her employment and ending on the one-year date. This provision does not apply to the restricted stock or restricted stock unit awards made under the Omnibus Plans.

              In addition, the Omnibus Plans provide that, in the event that the grantee's service with us is terminated as a result of the grantee's retirement (as defined in the Omnibus Plans) and the grantee


      Table of Contents

      agrees to be bound for a three-year period by certain restrictive covenants, including non-competition, non-solicitation, non-disclosure and non-disparagement covenants, then (i) the payout opportunities attainable under all of the grantee's outstanding performance-based awards will vest based on actual performance through the end of the performance period, and the awards will payout on a pro-rata basis, based on the time elapsed prior to the date of retirement, and (ii) for the three-year period following the grantee's retirement, (ii) the grantee's outstanding restricted stock and restricted stock units will continue to vest, and (iii) the grantee will continue to vest in the portion of the options that were not vested and exercisable as of the date of his or her retirement, as if the grantee's service had not terminated. If the grantee violates any of the restrictive covenants during the three-year period, all outstanding options (whether or not vested) and all unvested restricted stock, restricted stock units or performance awards then held by the grantee will be immediately forfeited and cancelled as of the date of such violation.

      Potential Realization Value of Equity Awards upon a Change in Control without Termination

              Under the 2007 Omnibus Plan and the 2010 Omnibus Plan, in the event of a change in control, the vesting of outstanding awards may be accelerated regardless of whether the employment of the holder of such an award is terminated in connection therewith. The following table shows the potential realizable value of outstanding awards granted to our named executive officers pursuant to the 2007 Omnibus Plan and the 2010 Omnibus Plan, assuming that:

        an event which has constituted a change in control under each of the 2007 Omnibus Plan and the 2010 Omnibus Plan, each as described above, was consummated occurred on September 30, 2016, the last business day of fiscal year 2016;

        with respect to outstanding options awarded pursuant to the 2007 Omnibus Plan or the 2010 Omnibus Plan, that the Compensation Committee did not exercise its discretion to cancel the options in exchange for a cash payment based upon the difference between the price per share offered in connection with the change in control and the exercise price;

        with respect to outstanding awards granted pursuant to the 2007 Omnibus Plan or the 2010 Omnibus Plan, that the Compensation Committee did not provide for substitute awards or make another determination with respect to the treatment of awards;

        each named executive officer exercised all previously unexercisable options only to the extent that the exercise price of such options did not equal or exceed the closing price for shares of our Common Stock on the NYSE on September 30, 2016;

        each named executive officer sold the shares of our Common Stock underlying his or her previously unvested shares of restricted stock at the closing price for shares of our Common Stock on the NYSE on September 30, 2016, and

        each named executive officer sold the shares of our Common Stock underlying his or her PBRSUs at the closing price for shares of our Common Stock on the NYSE on September 30, 2016.

      Table of Contents

        Name
        Amount Payable($)(1)

        Christian A. Brickman

        2,888,201

        Mark J. Flaherty

        901,487

        Matthew O. Haltom

        556,977

        Mark G. Spinks

        398,849

        Sharon Leite

        292,983

        (1)
        In accordance with SEC rules, based on the closing price for our Common Stock on the NYSE on September 30, 2016, which was $25.68.

        Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
        2019.

        The following table provides the estimated payments that would be made to each of our named executive officers under his severance agreement, as well as the amounts our named executive officers would receive upon the exercise and sale of certain equity awards that were accelerated in connection with employment termination, assuming that:

          each named executive officer's employment with us was terminated on September 30, 2016, the last business day of our fiscal year 2016;

          with respect to the columns in the following table that reflect amounts that would have been received based on a termination of employment in connection with a change in control, the named executive officer's employment with us was terminated in connection with an event that constituted a change in control under any agreement or plan described above;

          the base salary earned by each named executive officer for his services to us through September 30, 2016 has been fully paid;

          with respect to options awarded pursuant to the 2007 Omnibus Plan or the 2010 Omnibus Plan, the Compensation Committee did not exercise its discretion to cancel the options in exchange for a cash payment based upon the difference between the price per share offered in connection with the change in control and the exercise price;

          with respect to awards granted pursuant to the 2007 Omnibus Plan or the 2010 Omnibus Plan, the Compensation Committee did not provide for substitute awards or make another determination with respect to the treatment of awards;

          each named executive officer exercised all options that were accelerated by virtue of his termination at the closing price for shares of our Common Stock on the NYSE on September 30, 2016, which was $25.68, but only to the extent that the exercise price of such options did not equal or exceed $25.68;

          each named executive officer sold the shares of restricted stock with respect to which vesting was accelerated by virtue of his termination at the closing price for shares of our Common Stock on the NYSE on September 30, 2016, which was $25.68; and

          each named executive officer sold the shares of Common Stock underlying his or her PBRSUs with respect to which vesting was accelerated by virtue of his termination at the closing price for shares of our Common Stock on the NYSE on September 30, 2016, which was $25.68.

                In addition, the amounts presented in the following table do not reflect amounts the named executive officerNEO earned or accrued prior to termination,the triggering event, such as such officer's previously vested options and restricted stock.equity awards. For information about these previously earned and accrued amounts, see the "Summary“Summary Compensation Table," the "OutstandingTable”, “Outstanding Equity Awards at 20162019 Fiscal Year End"Year-End” table and the "Fiscal 2016 Option“Option Exercises and Stock Vested"Vested in FY19” table located elsewhere inof this Proxy Statement.

        Name and Potential Payment Type

         

        For Cause or

        Voluntary

        Resignation

        ($)

          

        Death or

        Disability

        ($)

          

        Retirement

        ($) (1)

          

        Change in

        Control

        ($) (2) (8)

          

        Change in

        Control with
        Qualified

        Termination

        ($) (2) (3) (8)

         

         

        Current NEOs

         

                       

         

        Christian A. Brickman

              

            Current Fiscal Year AIP Award (4)

             820,520      820,520   820,520 

            Severance (5)

                      2,873,385 

            Equity Awards (6)

             1,587,854      3,584,977   3,584,977 

            Health and Welfare Benefits (7)

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

        27,789

         

         

         

            Total

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

        2,408,374

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

        4,405,497

         

         

         

          

         

        7,306,671

         

         

         

         

        Aaron E. Alt

              

            Current Fiscal Year AIP Award (4)

             600,237      600,237   600,237 

            Severance (5)

                      1,858,660 

            Equity Awards (6)

             475,170      1,035,972   1,035,972 

            Health and Welfare Benefits (7)

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

        47,519

         

         

         

            Total

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

        1,075,407

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

        1,636,209

         

         

         

          

         

        3,542,388

         

         

         

         

        Mark G. Spinks

              

            Current Fiscal Year AIP Award (4)

             204,756      204,756   204,756 

            Severance (5)

                      1,175,957 

            Equity Awards (6)

             280,482      612,143   612,143 

            Health and Welfare Benefits (7)

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

        45,067

         

         

         

            Total

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

        485,238

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

        816,899

         

         

         

          

         

        2,037,923

         

         

         

         

        Scott C. Sherman

              

            Current Fiscal Year AIP Award (4)

             177,590      177,590   177,590 

            Severance (5)

                      874,545 

            Equity Awards (6)

             196,260      387,304   387,304 

            Health and Welfare Benefits (7)

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

        44,894

         

         

         

            Total

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

        373,850

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

        564,894

         

         

         

          

         

        1,484,333

         

         

         

         

        John M. Henrich

              

            Current Fiscal Year AIP Award (4)

             129,993      129,993   129,993 

            Severance (5)

                      858,349 

            Equity Awards (6)

             86,441      183,294   183,294 

            Health and Welfare Benefits (7)

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

        19,258

         

         

         

            Total

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

        216,434

         

         

         

          

         

         

         

         

          

         

        313,287

         

         

         

          

         

        1,190,894

         

         

         

        (1)

        None of the NEOs were eligible for retirement as of September 30, 2019.

        (2)

        For purposes of the severance agreements, a “change in control” generally includes: (i) the acquisition by any person of 20% or more of the voting power of our outstanding Common Stock; (ii) a change in the majority of the incumbent Board of Directors; (iii) certain reorganizations, mergers or consolidations of us involving a change of ownership of 50% or more of our Common Stock or sales of substantially all of our assets; or (iv) stockholder approval of our complete liquidation or dissolution.

        (3)

        For purposes of this table, a qualified termination means termination without cause or a resignation for good reason within 24 months following a change in control. “Good reason” generally includes: (i) a material diminution in authority, duties or responsibilities of the executive or the supervisor to whom the executive reports; (ii) a material reduction in the executive’s base salary; (iii) a material reduction in the budget over which the executive retains authority; (iv) a relocation of the executive’s principal location by more than 20 miles; or (v) any other material breach of the severance agreement. “Cause” generally includes: (i) the executive’s uncured demonstrably willful and deliberate material breach of duties and responsibilities, which is committed in bad faith or without reasonable belief that such breach is in the best interests of the Company; and (ii) the executive’s commission of a felony involving moral turpitude.

        60        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement



        LOGO

        (4)

        Reflects the current fiscal year AIP award earned, but not yet paid as of September 30, 2019.

        (5)

        Reflects a severance payment of 1.99 times the NEO’s base salary as of the end of FY19 plus 1.99 times the average of the NEO’s AIP award payouts for the previous five fiscal years (excluding FY19), payable in a lump sum. Per the terms of his severance agreement, Mr. Alt’s FY18 AIP award was annualized for purposes of his severance calculation.

        (6)

        Reflects the estimated value of unvestedin-the-money options, PBRSUs and TBRSAs based on the closing price per share of our Common Stock on September 30, 2019 of $14.89. For purposes of this calculation, unvested options having a value less than $14.89 have a value of $0. For PBRSUs, calculations are based on the following: (i) in the case of death, disability, or retirement, the target number of units for FY19 and FY18 and 0% of the target number of units for FY17; and (ii) in the case of a change in control, the target number of units for FY19, FY18 and FY17 grants, per the terms of the award agreements. The impact of each scenario on outstanding options, PBRSUs and TBRSAs is described in the following table:

        Equity Award Type

        For Cause or

        Voluntary

        Resignation

        Death or

        Disability

        Retirement (a)

        Change in

        Control (b)

        Options

        ForfeitedAccelerated Vesting(Next Tranche Only)

        Continues to Vest

        up to 36 Months

        Accelerated

        Vesting (All)

        PBRSUs

        Forfeited

        Prorated

        (Based on Actual Performance)

        Prorated

        (Based on Actual Performance)

        Accelerated Vesting

        (All at Target)

        TBRSAs

        ForfeitedAccelerated Vesting(Next Tranche Only)

        Continues to Vest

        up to 36 Months

        Accelerated

        Vesting (All)

        (a)

        Assuming the NEO agrees to restrictive covenants.

        (b)

        Assuming options and TBRSAs awarded pursuant to the 2010 and 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plans were not assumed by the acquirer and, instead, were cancelled in connection with a change in control in exchange for a cash payment (based upon the difference between the price per share offered in connection with the change in control and the exercise price, in the case of options).

        (7)

        Reflects the cost of continued health and welfare benefits for 24 months, based on (i) our portion of the projected cost of the benefits (the NEO pays the employee cost for such coverage) and (ii) the level of coverage selected by the NEO.

        (8)

        Pursuant to the terms of the severance agreements, any payments to the executive under such agreements will be reduced so that the present value of such payments plus any other “parachute payments” as determined under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code will not, in the aggregate, exceed 2.99 times the executive’s average taxable income from us over the five-year period ending prior to the year in which a change in control occurs. However, no such reduction will apply to payments that do not constitute “excess parachute payments” under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code.

        Separation Agreement with Mr. Selvidge

        Table of Contents

         
          
          
         No Change
        in Control
        Voluntary
        Termination
          
          
          
          
          
         
         
          
          
          
          
          
         Change in
        Control
        Termination
        w/o Cause
        or
        for Good
        Reason
         Change in
        Control
        Termination
        w/ Cause or
        w/o Good
        Reason
         
         
          
         No Change
        in Control
        Termination
        w/ and
        w/o Cause
         No Change
        in Control
        Termination
        Due to
        Death
         No Change
        in Control
        Termination
        Due to
        Disability
         No Change
        in Control
        Termination
        Due to
        Retirement
         
        Name and Principal Position
         Benefit Description w/ Good
        Reason
         w/o Good
        Reason
         

        Christian A. Brickman

         Prorata bonus(1)  0  0  0  0  515,265  0  515,265  0 

        President & Chief

         Severance pay (2)  0  0  0  0  0  0  1,947,215  0 

        Executive Officer

         Bonus payment(3)  0  0  0  0  0  0  856,800  0 

         Stock option vesting(4)  0  0  0  235,677  235,677  235,677  471,354  471,354 

         Restricted stock vesting(5)  0  0  0  688,250  688,250  688,250  1,376,499  1,376,499 

         Performance units vesting(6)  0  0  0  346,783  346,783  346,783  1,040,348  1,040,348 

         Health care benefits continuation(7)  0  0  0  0  0  0  26,880  0 

         Accrued vacation(8)  75,269  75,269  75,269  75,269  0  75,269  75,269  75,269 

         Exec Outplacement  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0 

         Section 280G Excise Tax Cutback  0  0  0  0  0  0  (2,040,236) 0 

         TOTAL VALUE  75,269  75,269  75,269  1,345,979  1,785,975  1,345,979  4,269,394  2,963,470 

        Mark J. Flaherty(9)

         

        Prorata bonus(1)

          
        0
          
        0
          
        0
          
        0
          
        162,335
          
        0
          
        162,335
          
        0
         

        Former Senior Vice

         Severance pay(2)  0  0  0  0  0  0  1,022,462  0 

        President, Chief

         Bonus payment(3)  0  0  0  0  0  0  479,122  0 

        Financial Officer

         Stock option vesting(4)  0  0  0  124,996  124,996  124,996  200,063  200,063 

         Restricted stock vesting(5)  0  0  0  177,320  177,320  177,320  354,641  354,641 

         Performance units vesting(6)  0  0  0  115,594  115,594  115,594  346,783  346,783 

         Health care benefits continuation(7)  0  0  0  0  0  0  47,256  0 

         Accrued vacation(8)  52,467  52,467  52,467  52,467  0  52,467  52,467  52,467 

         Exec Outplacement  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0 

         Section 280G Excise Tax Cutback  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0 

         TOTAL VALUE  52,467  52,467  52,467  470,377  580,245  470,377  2,665,129  953,954 

        Matthew O. Haltom

         

        Prorata bonus(1)

          
        0
          
        0
          
        0
          
        0
          
        130,776
          
        0
          
        130,776
          
        0
         

        Senior Vice President,

         Severance pay (2)  0  0  0  0  0  0  823,860  0 

        General Counsel and

         Bonus payment(3)  0  0  0  0  0  0  230,593  0 

        Corporate Secretary

         Stock option vesting(4)  0  0  0  74,060  74,060  74,060  121,470  121,470 

         Restricted stock vesting(5)  0  0  0  108,241  108,241  108,241  216,482  216,482 

         Performance units vesting(6)  0  0  0  73,008  73,008  73,008  219,025  219,025 

         Health care benefits continuation(7)  0  0  0  0  0  0  46,800  0 

         Accrued vacation(8)  8,236  8,236  8,236  8,236  0  8,236  8,236  8,236 

         Exec Outplacement  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0 

         Section 280G Excise Tax Cutback  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0 

         TOTAL VALUE  8,236  8,236  8,236  263,545  386,085  263,545  1,797,242  565,213 

        Mark G. Spinks

         

        Prorata bonus(1)

          
        0
          
        0
          
        0
          
        0
          
        258,435
          
        0
          
        258,435
          
        0
         

        President, Beauty Systems

         Severance pay (2)  0  0  0  0  0  0  746,250  0 

        Group

         Bonus payment(3)  0  0  0  0  0  0  224,583  0 

         Stock option vesting(4)  0  0  0  47,353  47,353  47,353  86,863  86,863 

         Restricted stock vesting(5)  0  0  0  64,739  64,739  64,739  129,478  129,478 

         Performance units vesting(6)  0  0  0  60,836  60,836  60,836  182,508  182,508 

         Health care benefits continuation(7)  0  0  0  0  0  0  48,624  0 

         Accrued vacation(8)  28,846  28,846  28,846  28,846  0  28,846  28,846  28,846 

         Exec Outplacement  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0 

         Section 280G Excise Tax Cutback  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0 

         TOTAL VALUE  28,846  28,846  28,846  201,774  431,363  201,774  1,705,587  427,695 

        Sharon Leite

         

        Prorata bonus(1)

          
        0
          
        0
          
        0
          
        0
          
        104,564
          
        0
          
        104,564
          
        0
         

        President, Sally Beauty

         Severance pay(2)  0  0  0  0  0  0  1,044,750  0 

        Stores

         Bonus payment(3)  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0 

         Stock option vesting(4)  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0 

         Restricted stock vesting(5)  0  0  0  97,661  97,661  97,661  292,983  292,983 

         Performance units vesting(6)  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0 

         Health care benefits continuation(7)  0  0  0  0  0  0  42,936  0 

         Accrued vacation(8)  40,385  40,385  40,385  40,385  0  40,385  40,385  40,385 

         Exec Outplacement  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0 

         Section 280G Excise Tax Cutback  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0 

         TOTAL VALUE  40,385  40,385  40,385  138,046  202,225  138,046  1,525,618  333,368 

        (1)
        Based on the annual bonus earned for fiscal year 2016.

        Table of Contents

        (2)
        Reflects, as an element of severance, the applicable multiple of the executive's annual base salary.

        (3)
        Reflects, as an element of severance, the applicable multiple of the executive's annual bonus. For each executive other than Mr. Brickman and Ms. Leite, the amount reflected in the table is based on the average annual bonus that the executive received in the five fiscal years prior to fiscal 2016. Mr. Brickman commenced employment with us in June 2014 and Ms. Leite commenced employment with us in February 2016; therefore they did not receive any bonus for years prior to our fiscal year 2015 and fiscal year 2016, respectively.

        (4)
        Reflects the difference between the closing price for shares of our Common Stock on the NYSE on September 30, 2016, the last trading day of our 2016 fiscal year ($25.68) and the exercise price of the unvested stock options held by our named executive officers. The unvested stock options were awarded under the 2007 Omnibus Plan, and the 2010 Omnibus Plan.

        (5)
        Reflects the value of restricted stock, calculated by multiplying the number of shares of restricted stock by the closing the price for shares of our Common Stock on the NYSE on September 30, 2016, the last trading day of our 2016 fiscal year ($25.68).

        (6)
        Reflects the value of performance units, calculated by multiplying the target number of units by the closing price for shares of our Common Stock on the NYSE on September 30, 2016, the last trading day of our 2016 fiscal year ($25.68) and, in the case of retirement, death or disability, prorating such number of units based on a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days elapsed from October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2016 (the assumed date of termination), and the denominator of which is the number of days in the performance period (October 1, 2015 — September 30, 2018).

        (7)
        Reflects the cost of continued medical and welfare benefits, based on (i) our portion of the projected cost of the benefits (the executive pays the employee cost for such coverage), (ii) the level of medical coverage selected by the executive (employee only, employee plus one, or family) and (iii) the level of life insurance and disability coverage (which is a function of salary up to the limits of the applicable benefit).

        (8)
        Based on the number of accrued vacation hours available for the executive as of September 30, 2016, multiplied by the equivalent hourly rate for the executive's base salary.

        (9)
        Mr. FlahertySelvidge separated from the CorporationCompany on September 30, 2016,June 27, 2019, and in connection with such separation, his severance agreement expired and he was not entitled to any benefits thereunder. In addition, he forfeited his unvested outstanding equity awards were forfeited. In connection with his separation, the Corporationawards. The Company and Mr. FlahertySelvidge entered into a separation agreement, pursuant to which Mr. Flaherty will continueSelvidge received an amount equal to receive his base salary for fifteen months ($642,250)$177,112.67, payable within 10 days following his separation in exchange for his release of all potential claims against the Corporation.Company and his agreement to confidentiality andnon-disparagement provisions, as well as a one yearnon-competition covenant. In addition, the Corporation will payCompany paid Mr. Flaherty'sSelvidge’s cost for health insurance continuation under COBRA for a period of fifteeneighteen months ($37,036).

        Executive Officer Indemnification Agreement

                Each member33,971.94), one year of outplacement services ($25,000.00), $3,774.66 for attorneys’ fees and costs, and a prorated AIP payout based onyear-end final performance, as reflected in the Board, includingSummary Compensation Table –Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation”. He also received a payment of $177,112.67 for allegednon-wage related compensatory damages. Mr. Brickman, has been provided with an indemnification agreement. Please see "Director Indemnification Agreements"Selvidge remains subject to theone-year employee and customernon-solicitation covenant included in his equity grant agreements, as described earlier in this Proxy Statement for a description of these arrangements.


        EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
        Statement.

         The executive officers of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., their ages (as of November 15, 2016), and their positions for at least the last five years are as follows:

        Christian A. Brickman, 51, has been our President and Chief Executive Officer since February 2015 and a member of our Board since September 2012. Prior to being appointed to his current role, Mr. Brickman served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation from June 2014 to February 2015. Prior to joining the Corporation, Mr. Brickman served as President of Kimberly-Clark International from May 2012 to February 2014, where he led the Corporation's international consumer business in all operations. From August 2010 to May 2012, Mr. Brickman served as President of Kimberly-Clark Professional. From 2008 to 2010, Mr. Brickman served as Chief Strategy Officer and played a key role in the development and implementation of Kimberly-Clark's strategic plans and processes to enhance enterprise growth initiatives. Prior to joining Kimberly-Clark, Mr. Brickman was a Principal in McKinsey & Company's Dallas, Texas, office and a leader in the firm's consumer packaged goods and operations practices. Before joining McKinsey, Mr. Brickman was President and CEO of Whitlock Packaging, the largest non-carbonated beverage co-packing company in the United States, from 1998 to 2001. From 1994 to 1998, he was with Guinness/United Distillers, initially as Vice President of Strategic Planning for the Americas region and then as General Manager for Guinness Brewing Worldwide's Latin America region. Mr. Brickman was awarded an advanced bachelor's degree in economics in 1986 from Occidental College in Los Angeles where he graduated with honors, Phi Beta Kappa and cum laude.

        Matthew O. Haltom, 45, has been our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since November 2012. Mr. Haltom has served in several positions with the Corporation since November 2006, including as Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from January 2010 to November 2012 and Associate General Counsel from 2006 to 2010. Mr. Haltom previously served as chief securities compliance counsel for two other publicly-traded companies. Mr. Haltom has a B.A.


        Table of Contents

        and an M.A. in Government from the University of Texas at Austin and a J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center.

        Janna Minton, 65, has been our Group Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller since October 2015 and has served as our interim Chief Financial Officer since September 30, 2016. Ms. Minton served as our Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller from August 2008 to October 2015. Prior to joining the Corporation, Ms. Minton served as the Principal Accounting Officer and Controller of Tandy Brands Accessories, Inc., a designer, manufacturer and marketer of leather goods, from October 2007 to August 2008, as their Corporate Controller from August 2002 to October 2007 and as their Corporate Accounting Manager from December 1999 to August 2002. From 1993 to December 1999, Ms. Minton held the position of Accounting Manager for a manufacturer located in Arlington, Texas and a real estate management company located in Dallas, Texas. Ms. Minton is a certified public accountant.

        Mark Spinks, 55, has been the President of Beauty Systems Group LLC since July 2015. Mr. Spinks previously held a number of positions of increasing responsibility with us. Mr. Spinks was most recently the Chief Operating Officer of Beauty Systems Group LLC, a position he has served in since September 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Spinks was the Vice President of Operations/GM for the Corporation's Armstrong McCall franchise business, a position he held for five and a half years, and prior to that was the Director of Business Development for the Corporation for almost four years.

        Sharon M. Leite, 53, has been the President of Sally Beauty Supply LLC since February 2016. Prior to her appointment at Sally Beauty Supply LLC, Ms. Leite held various executive leadership roles since 2007 at Pier 1 Imports, Inc. as an Executive Vice President. She led that company's Sales and Customer Experience strategy with over 20,000 field associates in over 1,000 stores in the U.S. and Canada. In addition, her responsibilities included E-commerce, Operations & Real Estate. Pier 1 Imports is a global importer of decorative home furnishings and gifts with over 1,000 stores in the United States and Canada. Prior to joining Pier 1 Imports, Ms. Leite served as Vice President, Sales & Associate Marketing (2007), Vice President, Store Operations (2001-2006) and Director, Store Operations & Sales Support (1999-2001), of Bath and Body Works, LLC, an international retailer specializing in bath and beauty products.


        Table of Contents


        OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES

        Securities Owned by Directors, Executive Officers and Certain Beneficial Owners

                The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership, as of November 15, 2016, of: (i) our Common Stock by each person believed by us (based upon their Schedule 13D or 13G filings with the SEC), to beneficially own more than 5% of the total number of outstanding shares; and (ii) our Common Stock by each current director (including director nominees) or executive officer and of all the current directors (including director nominees) and executive officers as a group. The number of shares beneficially owned by each person or group as of November 15, 2016, includes shares of Common Stock that such person or group had the right to acquire on or within 60 days after November 15, 2016, including upon the exercise of options. The total number of outstanding shares on which the percentages of share ownership in the table are based is 143,956,374. All such information is estimated and subject to change. Each outstanding share of Common Stock entitles its holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. Except as specified below, the business address of the persons listed is our headquarters, 3001 Colorado Boulevard, Denton, Texas 76210.

                Ownership of our Common Stock is shown in terms of "beneficial ownership." Amounts and percentages of Common Stock beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be a "beneficial owner" of a security if that person has or shares "voting power," which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or "investment power," which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which he has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. More than one person may be considered to beneficially own the same shares. In the table below, unless otherwise noted, a person has sole voting and dispositive power for those shares shown as beneficially owned by such person.


        Table of Contents

        Name of Beneficial Owner
         Amount and Nature of
        Beneficial Ownership of
        Common Stock(1)
         Percent of
        Class(2)
         

        Christian A. Brickman

          388,307(3) * 

        Sharon M. Leite

          11,409(4) * 

        Mark G. Spinks

          112,174(5) * 

        Matthew O. Haltom

          126,158(6) * 

        Janna Minton

          134,136(7) * 

        Katherine Button Bell

          13,510(8) * 

        Erin Nealy Cox

          568(9) * 

        Marshall E. Eisenberg

          124,226(10) * 

        David W. Gibbs

          1,838(11) * 

        Robert R. McMaster

          95,099(12) * 

        John A. Miller

          249,287(13) * 

        Susan R. Mulder

          7,377(14) * 

        Edward W. Rabin

          130,226(15) * 

        All directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons)

          1,394,315(16) * 

        Massachusetts Financial Services Company
        111 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02199

          15,979,106(17) 11.10%

        FMR LLC
        245 Summer Street Boston, MA 02210

          10,944,787(18) 7.60%

        Eaton Vance Management
        2 International Place Boston, MA 02110

          16,295,188(19) 11.32%

        The Vanguard Group
        100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355

          10,082,989(20) 7.00%

        Janus Capital Management LLC
        151 Detroit Street Denver, CO 80206

          8,190,232(21) 5.69%

        Jackson Square Partners, LLC
        101 California Street, Suite 3750 San Francisco, CA 94111

          7,647,967(22) 5.31%

        (1)
        Except as otherwise noted, the directors and named executive officers, and all directors and executive officers as a group, have sole voting power and sole investment power over the shares listed.

        (2)
        An asterisk indicates that the percentage of Common Stock projected to be beneficially owned by the named individual does not exceed one percent of our Common Stock.

        (3)
        Includes 78,941 shares of Common Stock, 53,602 shares of restricted Common Stock, 247,705 shares subject to stock options exercisable currently or within 60 days and 8,059 vested restricted stock units.

        (4)
        Includes 11,409 shares of restricted Common Stock.

        (5)
        Includes 2,223 shares of Common Stock, 4,922 shares of restricted Common Stock, 2,283 shares held as a participant in the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan and 102,746 shares subject to stock options exercisable currently or within 60 days.

        (6)
        Includes 3,060 shares of Common Stock, 6,999 shares of restricted Common Stock and 116,099 shares subject to stock options exercisable currently or within 60 days.

        (7)
        Includes 12,960 shares of Common Stock, 2,429 shares of restricted Common Stock and 118,747 shares subject to stock options exercisable currently or within 60 days.

        (8)
        Includes 122 shares of Common Stock and 13,388 vested restricted stock units.

        (9)
        Includes 28 shares of Common Stock and 540 vested restricted stock units.

        (10)
        Includes 60,000 shares of Common Stock and 64,226 vested restricted stock units.

        Table of Contents

        (11)
        Includes 1,838 shares of Common Stock.

        (12)
        Includes 35,130 shares of Common Stock and 59,969 vested restricted stock units.

        (13)
        Includes 19,802 shares of Common Stock, 181,006 shares held by the Rellim Dynasty Trust, which such person serves as trustee and disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein and 48,479 vested restricted stock units.

        (14)
        Includes 2,132 shares of Common Stock and 5,245 vested restricted stock units.

        (15)
        Includes 11,903 shares of Common Stock, 56,000 shares of Common Stock held by such person as trustee of a trust for the benefit of himself, 10,000 shares of Common Stock held by wife and 52,323 vested restricted stock units.

        (16)
        Includes 475,145 shares of Common Stock, 79,361 shares of restricted Common Stock, 2,283 shares held as participants in the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan, 585,297 shares subject to stock options exercisable currently or within 60 days and 252,229 vested restricted stock units. Such persons have shared voting and investment power with respect to 10,000 shares.

        (17)
        Based solely on information provided on that certain Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 5) dated February 12, 2016, which reflects sole voting power with respect to 14,203,269 shares and shared voting power with respect to 0 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 15,979,106 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares beneficially owned by Massachusetts Financial Services Company, a Delaware corporation, and/or certain other non-reporting entities.

        (18)
        Based solely on information provided on that certain Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 1) dated February 12, 2016, which reflects sole voting power with respect to 658,347 shares and shared voting power with respect to 0 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 10,944,787 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares beneficially owned by FMR LLC; FMR LLC filed as a parent holding company in accordance with Section 240.13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(G).

        (19)
        Based solely on information provided on that certain Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 5) dated July 12, 2016, which reflects sole voting power with respect to 16,295,188 shares and shared voting power with respect to 0 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 16,295,188 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares beneficially owned by Eaton Vance Management.

        (20)
        Based solely on information provided on that certain Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 2) dated February 10, 2016, which reflects sole voting power with respect to 113,169 shares and shared voting power with respect to 8,800 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 9,970,520 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 112,469 shares beneficially owned by The Vanguard Group, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation.

        (21)
        Based solely on information provided on that certain Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 2) dated February 16, 2016, which reflects sole voting power with respect to 8,135,832 shares and shared voting power with respect to 54,400 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 8,135,832 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 54,400 shares beneficially owned directly by Janus Capital Management LLC (8,135,832 shares) and indirectly by Janus Capital Management LLC (54,400 shares) through its controlling ownership interest in INTECH Investment Management and Perkins Investment Management LLC.

        (22)
        Based solely on information provided on that certain Schedule 13G dated February 12, 2016, which reflects sole voting power with respect to 1,788,449 shares and shared voting power with respect to 5,013,252 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 7,647,967 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares beneficially owned by Jackson Square Partners, LLC.

        Table of Contents


        SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

                Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and certain persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common Stock and other security interests of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. Directors, executive officers, and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by the regulations of the SEC to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

                To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, we believe that, with the exceptions noted below, all of our directors and officers complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements during fiscal 2016.

                Due to late notice received from Mr. Winterhalter and his broker regarding a sale of stock on October 1, 2015, Mr. Winterhalter filed a late Form 4 reporting that transaction on October 20, 2015.


        Table of Contents


        REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

                The Audit Committee serves an independent oversight role by consulting with and providing guidance to management and the Corporation's independent auditors on matters such as accounting, audits, compliance, controls, disclosure, finance and risk management. The Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that all Audit Committee members are "independent" (within the meaning of the applicable rules of the NYSE and the SEC) and financially literate. The Board of Directors has designated Robert R. McMaster, the Chairman of the Audit Committee, along with Marshall E. Eisenberg, John A. Miller, and David W. Gibbs as audit committee financial experts under the SEC's guidelines.

                The Audit Committee's purposes and responsibilities are described in its charter, available on the corporate governance section of the Corporation's website at http://investor.sallybeautyholdings.com and in print, without charge, upon written request to our Vice President of Investor Relations. They include (a) assisting the Board of Directors in its oversight of the integrity of the Corporation's financial statements and financial reporting processes, overseeing compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, reviewing the independent auditors' qualifications and independence (including auditor rotation), and reviewing the performance of the Corporation's internal audit function; (b) deciding whether to appoint, retain or terminate the Corporation's independent auditors and to pre-approve all audit, audit-related, tax and other services, if any, to be provided by the independent auditors; and (c) preparing this report. The Audit Committee members do not act as accountants or auditors for the Corporation. Management is responsible for the Corporation's financial statements and the financial reporting process, including the implementation and maintenance of effective internal control over financial reporting. The independent auditors are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The independent auditors have free access to the Audit Committee to discuss any matters they deem appropriate.

                The Audit Committee recognizes the importance of maintaining the independence of the Corporation's independent auditor, both in fact and appearance. Consistent with its charter, the Audit Committee has evaluated the qualifications, performance, and independence of KPMG, the Corporation's independent auditors, including that of KPMG's lead audit partner. As part of its auditor engagement process, the Audit Committee considers whether to rotate the independent auditors. The Audit Committee has established in its charter a policy pursuant to which all services, audit and non-audit, provided by the independent auditor must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee or its designee. The Corporation's pre-approval policy is more fully described in this Proxy Statement under the caption "Proposal 4 — Ratification of Selection of Auditors." The Audit Committee has concluded that provision of the non-audit services described in that section is compatible with maintaining the independence of KPMG. In this context, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed, with management and the independent auditors, the Corporation's audited financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2016. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountant required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountant's independence from the Corporation and its management. The Audit Committee has considered whether the independent auditors' provision of non-audit services to the Corporation is compatible with the auditors' independence.


        Table of Contents

                Following the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2016, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                     Submitted by the Audit Committee:

        www.sallybeautyholdings.com

         

        Robert R. McMaster (Chair)
        Erin Nealy Cox
        Marshall E. Eisenberg
        David W. Gibbs
        John A. Miller
                61

        Table of Contents


        LOGO


        PROPOSAL 2 — ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
        CEO PAY RATIO

                PursuantThe CEO pay ratio figures below are a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K under the Exchange Act. Given the different methodologies that various public companies will use to determine an estimate of their pay ratio, the Dodd Frank Act,estimated ratio reported below should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies.

        Since we did not have significant changes to our employee population and compensation programs, as allowed by SEC rules, we have used the SEC enacted requirementssame median employee that we identified in FY18 for purposes of our FY19 calculation.

        Our median employee determination date was July 1, 2018, which was within the Corporation to includelast three months of FY18, as required by the pay ratio rule. We determined that the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries had 29,730 employees as of July 1, 2018. To determine our median employee, we usedW-2 “gross pay” as our consistently applied compensation measure. We then annualized gross pay for permanent employees who commenced work during FY18 and any employees who were on leave for a portion of FY18. Using this methodology, we identified the median employee and determined their annual total compensation using the same methodology we use for our NEOs as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement a separate resolution, subject to an advisory (non-binding) vote, to approveStatement.

        For FY19, the total annual compensation of its named executive officers. This proposal is commonly referred to as a "Say on Pay" proposal. As required by these rules, the Board invites you to review carefully the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 23our CEO was $5,851,864 and the tabular and other disclosures onmedian employee’s total annual compensation under Executive Compensation beginning on page 45, and cast a vote "FOR"was $14,708. Accordingly, the Corporation's executive compensation programs through the following resolution:ratio of CEO pay to median employee pay was 398:1.

         "Resolved, that the stockholders approve the compensation of the Corporation's named executive officers, including the Corporation's compensation practices and principles and their implementation, as discussed and disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and any narrative executive compensation disclosure contained in this Proxy Statement."

        62        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


        LOGO

         As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 23, the Board of Directors believes that the Corporation's long-term success depends in large measure on the talents of our employees. The Corporation's compensation system plays a significant role in our ability to attract, retain, and motivate the highest quality workforce. The Board believes that its current compensation program directly links executive compensation to performance, aligning the interests of the Corporation's executive officers with those of its stockholders.

                Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, this vote is advisory and will not be binding on the Corporation. While the vote does not bind the Board to any particular action, the Board values the input of the stockholders, and will take into account the outcome of this vote in considering future compensation arrangements.

                At the 2011 annual meeting, our stockholders expressed a preference that advisory votes on executive compensation occur every three years. In accordance with the results of this vote, the Board determined to implement an advisory "Say on Pay" vote every three years until the next required vote on the frequency of "Say on Pay" votes, which will occur at this annual meeting. The Board will determine when the next advisory "Say on Pay" vote will occur after it determines the results of the vote on Proposal 3 (expression of the views of the stockholders on how frequently "Say on Pay" votes will occur).

                Although this vote is advisory in nature and does not impose any action on the Corporation or the Compensation Committee of the Board, the Corporation strongly encourages all stockholders to vote on this matter.


        THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL 2.


        Table of Contents


        PROPOSAL 3 — ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF ADVISORY VOTES
        ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

                As discussed in Proposal 2, the Board values the input of stockholders regarding the Corporation's executive compensation practices. Stockholders are also invited to express their views on how frequently advisory votes on executive compensation, such as Proposal 2, will occur. Stockholders can advise the Board on whether such votes should occur every 1 year, 2 years or 3 years or may abstain from voting.

                This is an advisory vote, and as such is not binding on the Board. However, the Board will take the results of the vote into account when deciding when to call for the next advisory vote on executive compensation. A scheduling vote similar to this will occur at least once every six years.

                The Board of Directors recommends that the advisory vote on executive compensation be held every year. An annual approach provides for more regular input by stockholders compared to the Corporation's previous triennial approach. Stockholders are not being asked to approve or disapprove of the Board's recommendation, but rather to indicate their own choice as among the frequency options.

        Please mark on the Proxy Card your preference as to the frequency of holding stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation, as either every 1 year, 2 years, or 3 years or you may mark "abstain" on this proposal.

        THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR "1 YEAR" ON PROPOSAL 3.


        Table of Contents


        PROPOSAL 4 — RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF AUDITORS

        Based upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors has selected KPMG LLP, which we refer to as KPMG, to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending September 30, 2016.2020. Although we are not required to seek stockholder ratification of this appointment, the Audit Committee and the Board believe it to be a matter of good corporate governance to do so. Representatives of KPMG will be present at the annual meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and will be available to answer appropriate questions.

        Fees Paid to KPMG

        The fees billed by KPMG with respect to the years ended September 30, 20152019 and September 30, 20162018 were as follows:

         
         Year Ended
        September 30, 2016
         Year Ended
        September 30, 2015
         

        Audit Fees(1)

         $2,351,143 $2,606,569 

        Audit-Related Fees

             

        Tax Fees(2)

         $786,596 $849,463 

        All Other Fees

             

        Total Fees(3)

         $3,137,739  3,456,032 

        (1)
        Aggregate fees billed for professional services for the audit of annual financial statements as well as accounting and reporting advisory services related to regulatory filings and acquisition activities.

        (2)
        Tax fees consist of fees for tax consultation and tax compliance services.

        (3)
        The Audit Committee pre-approved all fees.

         

         Year Ended
        September 30,
        2019
        Year Ended
        September 30,
        2018
           

        Audit Fees(1)

        $2,707,333$2,626,910
           

        Audit-Related Fees

                       —               —
           

        Tax Fees(2)

          $791,136$1,020,682
           

        All Other Fees

              $1,780      $1,927
           

        Total Fees(3)

        $3,500,249$3,649,519

        (1)

        Aggregate fees billed for professional services for the audit of annual financial statements as well as accounting and reporting advisory services related to regulatory filings and acquisition activities.

        (2)

        Tax fees consist of fees for tax consultation and tax compliance services.

        (3)

        The Audit Committeepre-approved all fees.

        The Audit Committee has reviewed thenon-audit services provided by KPMG and determined that the provision of these services during fiscal 20162019 is compatible with maintaining KPMG'sKPMG’s independence.

        Pre-Approval Policy. Our Audit Committee (or its designee, as described below) approved all audit and permissiblenon-audit fees during fiscal year 2016.2019. The Audit Committee has the sole and direct authority to engage, appoint and replace our independent auditors. In addition, the Audit Committee has established an Audit andNon-Audit ServicesPre-Approval Policy, whereby every engagement of KPMG to perform audit or permissiblenon-audit services on behalf of us or any of our subsidiaries requirespre-approval from the Audit Committee or its designee before KPMG is engaged to provide those services. Pursuant to that policy, we expect that on an annual basis, the Audit Committee will review and providepre-approval for certain types of services that may be rendered by the independent auditors, together with a budget for the applicable fiscal year. Thepre-approval policy also requires thepre-approval of any fees that are in excess of the amount budgeted by the Audit Committee. Thepre-approval policy contains a provision delegating limitedpre-approval authority to the chairman of the Audit Committee in instances whenpre-approval is needed prior to a scheduled Audit Committee meeting. The chairman of the Audit Committee would be required to report on suchpre-approvals at the next scheduled Audit Committee meeting. As a result, the Audit Committee or its designee has approved 100% of all services performed by KPMG on behalf of us or any of our subsidiaries subsequent to November 16, 2006, the date we became a public company.

        If the stockholders do not ratify the selection of KPMG, the selection of independent auditors will be reconsidered by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

        THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR"“FOR” APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL 4.3.

        www.sallybeautyholdings.com        63



        Table of ContentsLOGO


        STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
        REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

                IfThe Audit Committee serves an independent oversight role by consulting with and providing guidance to management and the Corporation’s independent auditors on matters such as accounting, audits, compliance, controls, disclosure, finance and risk management. The Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that all Audit Committee members are “independent” (within the meaning of the applicable rules of the NYSE and the SEC) and financially literate. The Board of Directors has designated Robert R. McMaster, the Chairman of the Audit Committee, along with Marshall E. Eisenberg, Diana S. Ferguson, David W. Gibbs, John A. Miller and Denise Paulonis as audit committee financial experts under the SEC’s guidelines.

        The Audit Committee’s purposes and responsibilities are described in its charter, available on the corporate governance section of the Corporation’s website at http://investor.sallybeautyholdings.com and in print, without charge, upon written request to our Vice President of Investor Relations. They include (a) assisting the Board of Directors in its oversight of the integrity of the Corporation’s financial statements and financial reporting processes, overseeing compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, reviewing the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence (including auditor rotation), and reviewing the performance of the Corporation’s internal audit function; (b) deciding whether to appoint, retain or terminate the Corporation’s independent auditors and topre-approve all audit, audit-related, tax and other services, if any, to be provided by the independent auditors; and (c) preparing this report. The Audit Committee members do not act as accountants or auditors for the Corporation. Management is responsible for the Corporation’s financial statements and the financial reporting process, including the implementation and maintenance of effective internal control over financial reporting. The independent auditors are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The independent auditors have free access to the Audit Committee to discuss any matters they deem appropriate.

        The Audit Committee recognizes the importance of maintaining the independence of the Corporation’s independent auditor, both in fact and appearance. Consistent with its charter, the Audit Committee has evaluated the qualifications, performance, and independence of KPMG LLP, the Corporation’s independent auditors, including that of KPMG LLP’s lead audit partner. As part of its auditor engagement process, the Audit Committee considers whether to rotate the independent auditors. The Audit Committee has established in its charter a policy pursuant to which all services, audit andnon-audit, provided by the independent auditor must bepre-approved by the Audit Committee or its designee. The Corporation’spre-approval policy is more fully described in this Proxy Statement under the caption “Proposal 3 — Ratification of Selection of Auditors.” The Audit Committee has concluded that provision of thenon-audit services described in that section is compatible with maintaining the independence of KPMG LLP. In this context, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed, with management and the independent auditors, the Corporation’s audited financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2019. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountant required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountant’s independence from the Corporation and its management. The Audit Committee has considered whether the independent auditors’ provision ofnon-audit services to the Corporation is compatible with the auditors’ independence.

        64        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


        LOGO

        Following the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2019, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

        Submitted by the Audit Committee:

        Robert R. McMaster (Chair)

        Marshall E. Eisenberg

        Diana S. Ferguson

        David W. Gibbs

        John A. Miller

        Denise Paulonis

        www.sallybeautyholdings.com        65


        LOGO

        DEADLINES AND PROCEDURES FOR NOMINATIONS AND STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

        Proposals for Inclusion in Proxy Materials for our 2021 Annual Meeting

        Under SEC Rule14a-8, if you intend to submit a stockholder proposal and request its inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy for our 20182021 annual meeting, such submission must be in writing and received by usour Corporate Secretary at our corporate headquarters no later than August 11, 2017.20, 2020. Submissions of stockholder proposals after this date will be considered untimely for inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy for our 20182021 annual meeting.

        Other Proposals or Nominations for the 2021 Annual Meeting

        OurBy-Laws require that any stockholder proposal or director nomination that is not submitted for inclusion in next year'syear’s proxy statement under SECRule 14a-8, but is instead sought to be presented directly at the 20182021 Annual Meeting, must be received at our principal executive offices not less than 90 days and not more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the 20172020 annual meeting. As a result, proposals and director nominations submitted pursuant to these provisions of ourBy-Laws must be received no earlier than September 28, 2017,October 2, 2020, and no later than the close of business on October 28, 2017,November 1, 2020, and must otherwise comply with the requirements of ourBy-Laws. Any stockholder submissions should be sent to us by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to: Corporate Secretary, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., 3001 Colorado Boulevard, Denton, Texas 76210, United States of America.

        A copy of ourBy-Laws may be obtained on the governance section of our Website at http://investor.sallybeautyholdings.com, or by written request to the Corporate Secretary, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., 3001 Colorado Boulevard, Denton, Texas 76210, United States of America.

        66        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


        LOGO


        REDUCE PRINTINGQUESTIONS AND MAILING COSTS
        ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

        1.

        Q: What is a proxy?

        A: A proxy is your legal designation of another person, called a proxy holder, to vote the shares that you own. If you designate someone as your proxy holder in a written document, that document is called a proxy. We have designated Aaron E. Alt, our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and President, Sally Beauty Supply and John Henrich, our General Counsel, to act as proxy holders at the annual meeting as to all shares for which proxies are returned or voting instructions are provided by internet or telephonic voting.

        2.

        Q: What is a proxy statement?

        A: A proxy statement is a document that SEC regulations require us to give you when we ask you to sign a proxy card designating the proxy holders described above to vote on your behalf.

        3.

        Q: What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a stockholder who holds stock in street name, also called a “beneficial owner?”

        A: If your shares are registered in your name at Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you are astockholder of record.

        If your shares are registered at Computershare Trust Company, N.A. in the name of a broker, bank, trustee, nominee, or other similar holder of record, your shares areheld in street name and you arethe beneficial owner of the shares.

        4.

        Q: What is the record date and what does it mean? Who can vote at the annual meeting?

        A: The record date for our annual meeting isDecember 2, 2019. The record date is established by our Board of Directors as required by Delaware law. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of the annual meeting and to vote their shares at the meeting and any adjournment or postponements of the meeting on the items of business described in this Proxy Statement. As of the record date there were 116,723,758 shares of our Common Stock outstanding. Each stockholder will be entitled to one vote in person or by proxy for each share of Common Stock held.

        5.

        Q: What different methods can I use to vote?

        A: It depends on how your shares are held.

        Stockholders of Record. If your shares are registered in your own name, you may vote by proxy or in person at the annual meeting. To vote by proxy, you may select one of the following options:

        By Written Proxy — You may vote by mailing the written proxy card.

        By Telephone or Internet Proxy — You may also vote by telephone from the U.S. using the toll-free telephone number on the proxy card, or by the Internet, using the procedures and instructions described on the proxy card and other enclosures. The telephone and Internet voting procedures, including the use of control numbers, are designed to authenticate our stockholders’ identities, to allow our stockholders to vote their shares, and to confirm that their instructions have been properly recorded.

        Street Name Holders. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other similar holder of record, check your proxy card or the information provided to you by such holder of record to determine which voting options are available until 1:00 a.m., local time, on January 30, 2020. Please follow their instructions carefully. Also, please note that if the holder of record of your shares is a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote in person at the annual meeting, you must request a legal proxy or broker’s proxy from such record holder that holds your shares and present that proxy and proof of identification at the annual meeting.

        www.sallybeautyholdings.com        67


        LOGO

        6.

        Q: What constitutes a quorum for the annual meeting?

        A: A quorum for the transaction of business will be present if the holders of a majority of our Common Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to cast votes at the annual meeting are present, in person or by proxy, at the annual meeting. Your shares are counted as present if you attend the annual meeting and vote in person or if you properly return a proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will be counted as “present” for purposes of establishing a quorum at the annual meeting. If a quorum is not present at the annual meeting, the annual meeting may be adjourned from time to time until a quorum is present.

        7.

        Q: How are abstentions and brokernon-votes counted?

        A: Votes will be counted and certified by an independent inspector of elections. Abstentions and brokernon-votes (as defined below) will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum but will not affect the outcome of the vote on any proposal. If you hold shares through an account with a bank, broker or other similar holder of record, the voting of the shares by the bank, broker or other similar holder of record when you do not provide voting instructions is governed by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). These rules allow banks, brokers and other similar holders of record to vote shares in their discretion on “routine” matters for which their customers do not provide voting instructions. On matters considered“non-routine,” banks, brokers and other similar holders of record may not vote shares (referred to as “brokernon-votes”) without your instruction.

        8.

        Q: What proposals are we voting on at this meeting? What are the voting recommendations of the Board and what vote is required to approve the proposals?

        A:

        The Proposals That You are Being Asked to Vote on at
        the Annual Meeting
        Our Board’s Voting
        Recommendations
        Vote Required to Approve
        each Nominee
        Proposal 1: Election of Twelve Directors to Serve forOne-Year TermsFOR EACH NOMINEEAffirmative Vote of a Majority of Votes Cast by Stockholders

        Vote Required to Approve
        Proposals 2 and 3

        Proposal 2: Advisory Approval of the Compensation of our NEOsFORAffirmative Vote of a Majority of Votes Cast by Stockholders
        Proposal 3: Ratification of the Appointment of KPMG LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal 2020FORAffirmative Vote of a Majority of Votes Cast by Stockholders

        A “majority of the votes cast” means the number of “For” votes exceeds the number of “Against” votes. If a nominee who currently is serving as a director does not receive the required vote forre-election, Delaware law provides that such director will continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover” director. However, pursuant to the Corporation’s Governance Guidelines, each holdover director must tender, or has already tendered, an irrevocable resignation that would be effective upon the Board’s acceptance of such resignation. In that situation, the Corporation’s Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee would consider the resignation and make a recommendation to the Board about whether to accept or reject such resignation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote.

        Proposals 1 and 2 are considerednon-routine, and therefore banks, brokers and other similar holders of record cannot vote shares on the proposals without your instructions. Thus, abstentions (withheld votes) and brokernon-votes will have no effect in determining whether the proposals have been approved.

        Proposal 3 is considered a routine matter. Thus, banks, brokers and other similar holders of record may vote shares on this proposal without your instructions. As such, there will be no brokernon-votes with respect to this proposal.

        68        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


        LOGO

        Votes cast by proxy or in person at the meeting will be tabulated by the Inspector of Election from Computershare Trust Company, N.A

        9.

        Q: Could other matters be voted on at the meeting?

        A: We do not know of any other business that will be presented at the 2020 annual meeting. If any other matters properly come before the meeting that are not specifically set forth on the proxy card and in this Proxy Statement, such matters shall be decided by a majority of the votes cast at the annual meeting, unless otherwise provided in our Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation (“Certificate of Incorporation”), Amended and RestatedBy-Laws(“By-Laws”), the Delaware General Corporation Law or the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange. None of the members of our Board have informed us in writing that they intend to oppose any action intended to be taken by us.

        10.

        Q: What happens if a stockholder does not specify a choice for a matter when returning a signed proxy?

        A: If the enclosed form of proxy card is signed and returned, it will be voted as specified in the proxy, or, if no vote is specified, it will be voted “FOR” all nominees presented in Proposal 1, “FOR” the proposal set forth in Proposal 2, and “FOR” the proposal set forth in Proposal 3.

        11.

        Q: Can I revoke my proxy?

        A: At any time before the annual meeting, you may revoke your proxy by timely delivery of written notice to our Corporate Secretary, by timely delivery of a properly executed, later-dated proxy (including an Internet or telephone vote), or by voting via ballot at the annual meeting. Voting in advance of the annual meeting will not limit your right to vote at the annual meeting if you decide to attend in person.

        12.

        Q: How do I obtain an admission ticket to personally attend the annual meeting?

        A: If you are astockholder of record, your admission ticket is attached to your proxy card. You will need to bring it with you to the meeting.

        If your shares areheld in street name, you will need to ask your broker or bank for an admission ticket in the form of a legal proxy and you will need to bring the legal proxy with you to the meeting. If you do not receive the legal proxy in time, bring your most recent brokerage statement with you to the meeting. We can use that to verify your ownership of Common Stock and admit you to the meeting; however, you will not be able to vote your shares at the meeting without a legal proxy. Please note that if you own shares in street name and you are issued a legal proxy, any previously executed proxy will be revoked and your vote will not be counted unless you appear at the meeting and vote in person.

        Please note that whether you are a stockholder of record or street name holder, you will also need to bring a government-issued photo identification card to gain admission to the annual meeting.

        13.

        Q: Who pays the cost of this proxy solicitation?

        A: The proxy accompanying this Proxy Statement is being solicited by our Board of Directors. We will bear the entire cost of this solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing, and mailing of this Proxy Statement, the proxy, and any additional information furnished to our stockholders. In addition to using the mail, proxies may be solicited by directors, executive officers, and other employees of the Corporation, in person or by telephone. No additional compensation will be paid to our directors, executive officers, or other employees for these services. We will also request banks, brokers, and other stockholders of record to forward proxy materials, at our expense, to the beneficial owners of our Common Stock. We have retained Alliance Advisors, LLC to assist us with the solicitation of proxies for an estimated fee of approximately $7,500, plus normal expenses not expected to exceed $5,000.

        14.

        Q: What is “householding” and how does it affect me as a stockholder?

        A: To reduce the expenses of delivering duplicate proxy materials, we may take advantage of the SEC's "householding"SEC’s “householding” rules that permit us to deliver only one set of proxy materials to stockholders who share an

        www.sallybeautyholdings.com        69


        LOGO

        address, unless otherwise requested. If you share an address with another stockholder and have received only one set of proxy materials, you may request a separate copy of these materials at no cost to you by calling our Investor Relations department at(940) 898-7500, by email at investorrelations@sallybeautyholdings.com, or by written request to the Corporate Secretary, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., 3001 Colorado Boulevard, Denton, Texas 76210. For future annual meetings, you may request separate voting materials, or request that we send only one set of proxy materials to you if you are receiving multiple copies, by calling or writing to us at the phone number and address given above.

        Stockholders of Record: If you vote on the Internet at www.investorvote.com,www.envisionreports.com/SBH, simply follow the prompts for enrolling in the electronic proxy delivery service.

        Beneficial Owners: If you hold your shares in a brokerage account, you also may have the opportunity to receive copies of these documents electronically. Please check the information provided in the proxy materials mailed to you by your bank or other holder of record regarding the availability of this service.


        15.

        Q: How will stockholders know the outcome of the proposals considered at the annual meeting?

        Table of ContentsA: We will announce preliminary results at the annual meeting. We will report final results athttp://investor.sallybeautyholdings.com and in a filing with the SEC onForm 8-K.


        OTHER MATTERS
        Other Matters

        The Board of Directors knows of no other matters to be acted upon at the annual meeting, but if any matters properly come before the meeting that are not specifically set forth on the proxy card and in this Proxy Statement, it is intended that the persons voting the proxies will vote in accordance with their best judgments.

        By Order of the Board of Directors,

        LOGO

        Corporate Secretary
        December 18, 2019

        70        LOGO    2019 Proxy Statement


        LOGO

        APPENDIX 1

        SALLY BEAUTY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        NON-GAAP FINANCIAL NUMBERS RECONCILIATION

        (In Millions—Unaudited)

                  FY16              FY17              FY18              FY19       
         

        Operating Income (as Reported GAAP)

          $498.3  $478.6  $426.6   $458.5
         

        Management Transition Expenses

              $1.3         
         

        Executive Separation Expense

               $0.7         
         

        Charges from Data Security Incidents

            $14.6         $7.9   
         

        Asset Impairment

              $0.6         
         

        Restructuring Charges

             $22.7    $33.6         ($0.7)
           

        Adjusted Operating Income(non-GAAP)

              $515   $501      $468       $458

                     By Order of the Board of Directors,



        GRAPHIC



        Matthew O. Haltom
        Corporate Secretary
        December 9, 2016www.sallybeautyholdings.com          A-1


        LOGO


        LOGO

        Using ablack ink pen, mark your votes with anX as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.


        TableLOGO

        Your vote matters – here’s how to vote!

        You may vote online or by phone instead of Contentsmailing this card.

        LOGO


         

          LOGOVotes submitted electronically must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on January 30, 2020.
          LOGO

        Online

        Go towww.envisionreports.com/SBH or scan the QR code – login details are located in the shaded bar below.

          LOGO

        Phone

        Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and Canada

          LOGO

        Save paper, time and money!

        Sign up for electronic delivery at

        www.envisionreports.com/SBH

            Annual Meeting Proxy Card

        LOGO

        MMMMMMMMMMMM . Admission Ticket MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM C123456789 000004 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext ENDORSEMENT_LINE______________ SACKPACK_____________ Electronic Voting Instructions Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on January 26, 2017. MR A SAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6 Vote by Internet • Go to www.envisionreports.com/SBH • Or scan the QR code with your smartphone • Follow the steps outlined on the secure website Vote by telephone • Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone • Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION,VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all nominees listed in Proposal 1, FOR Proposal 2, 1 YEAR for Proposal 3 and FOR Proposal 4. + 1. To elect the nine nominees named below to hold office until the annual meeting of stockholders for 2017 01 - Katherine Button Bell 05 - David W. Gibbs 09 - Edward W. Rabin 02 - Christian A. Brickman 06 - Robert R. McMaster 03 - Erin Nealy Cox 07 - John A. Miller 04 - Marshall E. Eisenberg 08 - Susan R. Mulder Mark here to vote FOR all nominees Mark here to WITHHOLD vote from all nominees 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 For All EXCEPT - To withhold a vote for one or more nominees, mark the box to the left and the corresponding numbered box(es) to the right. For Against Abstain 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years Abstain 2. Approval of the compensation of the Corporation’s executive officers including the Corporation’s compensation practices and principles and their implementation. 3. Frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation. *Please select only one option* For Against Abstain 4. Ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as the Corporation’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the fiscal year 2017. Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below Note: Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee, or guardian, please give full title as such. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. MMMMMMMC 1234567890 IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD. J N T MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND + 1 U P X2 9 1 9 8 2 1 02FM7D MMMMMMMMM B A Annual Meeting Proxy Card1234 5678 9012 345 X IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

        - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

         

          A  

        Proposals – The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all nominees listed in Proposal 1, FOR Proposal 2 and FOR Proposal 3.

        1. Election of Directors:

        ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain+

        01 - Timothy R. Baer

        02 - Christian A. Brickman03 - Marshall E. Eisenberg

        04 - Diana S. Ferguson

        05 - Dorlisa K. Flur06 - Linda Heasley

        07 - Robert R. McMaster

        08 - John A. Miller09 - P. Kelly Mooney

        10 - Susan R. Mulder

        11 - Denise Paulonis12 - Edward W. Rabin

        ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain

        2. Approval of the compensation of the Corporation’s executive officers including the Corporation’s compensation practices and principles and their implementation.

        3. Ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as the Corporation’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the fiscal year 2020.

          B  

        Authorized Signatures – This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. – Date and Sign Below

        Note: Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee, or guardian, please give full title as such.

        Date (mm/dd/yyyy) – Please print date below.

           Signature 1 – Please keep signature within the box.

           Signature 2 – Please keep signature within the box.

              /       /

        LOGO

                                                         03402C



        . Admission Ticket

        Annual Meeting of Stockholders of

        Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.

        Thursday, January 26, 2017 30, 2020

        9:00 A.M. CST

        SALLY SUPPORT CENTER

        3001 Colorado Boulevard

        Denton, Texas 76210

        This ticket admits only the stockholder(s) whose name(s) is/are printed on the front side of this proxy card. Please bring this admission ticket and a government issued photo identification card with you if you are attending the meeting. Directions to the Sally Support Center, the site of the meeting, are available by telephone at (940) 898-7500.

        YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

        Whether or not you plan to personally attend the Annual Meeting, please promptly vote over the Internet, by telephone, or by mailing in the proxy card. Voting by any of these methods will ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting if you choose not to attend in person. Voting early will not prevent you from voting in person at the Annual Meeting if you wish to do so. Your proxy is revocable in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Proxy Statement.

        LOGO

        q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION,VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q Proxy — Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.

        - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

          Proxy – Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.

        +

            This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.

        The undersigned hereby appoints Janna MintonAaron E. Alt and Shannon Barcroft,John Henrich, or any of them, proxies, each with full power of substitution, to vote the shares of the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. on January 26, 2017,30, 2020, any adjournments thereof, upon all matters as may properly come before the meeting. Without otherwise limiting the foregoing general authorization, the proxies are instructed to vote as indicated herein.

        You are encouraged to specify your choices by marking the appropriate boxes, SEE REVERSE SIDE. You need not mark any boxes if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations in the Proxy Statement FOR all nominees for election of directors in proposalProposal 1, FOR Proposal 2 1 YEAR for Proposal 3 and FOR Proposal 4.3. If any other matters properly come before the meeting that are not specifically set forth on the proxy card and in the Proxy Statement, it is intended that the persons voting the proxies will vote in accordance with their best judgments. The proxies cannot vote your shares unless you sign and return this card or vote electronically over the Internet or via the toll-free number.

        Please mark, sign and date on the reverse side. Non-Voting Items Change of Address — Please print new address below. Meeting Attendance Mark box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. + IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD. C

        c

        Non-Voting Items

         

        Change of Address – Please print new address below.Meeting Attendance
        Mark box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.

            ∎

        +